VIDEO: Southern Indiana World-Wide Freedom Rally Nov. 20, 2021. Video promoting the Brown County rally along with a video of likely the largest, first, grass-roots, peaceful, worldwide rally promoting human rights. The rallys were held in 100 cities in 40 countries.
Dont Tread on Indiana. Don’t Tread On Indiana is the advocacy arm of the Brown County Indiana Second Amendment Freedom Fighters, a grassroots coalition of like-minded Hoosiers, first organized on February 2, 2020, working together to help preserve and protect our great American values, customs and traditions. We are men and women from the great state of Indiana who revere God above the State, who firmly honor and support the US Constitution as the law of the land. To us the Bill of Rights is sacrosanct, and any attempts to infringe upon it are fundamentally unlawful, therefore unacceptable, and must be rebuked and defeated.
Don’t Tread On Indiana was formed to advocate for the legacy of the Founders, and to combat the encroachment of governmental overreach, socialistic propaganda and cultural subjugation — wherever we find it.
Two years later, Sweden’s COVID-19 death rate is 1,614 per million people – much lower than Britain (2,335) or the U.S. (2,836), which both had much more stringent lockdowns.
Sweden appears to have achieved herd immunity much more swiftly and thoroughly than other nations. Deaths were higher at the start of the pandemic but fell much lower than other lockdown nations in succeeding months.
What is clear today is that the Swedes saved their economy. This year, it’s projected to be 5% larger than before the pandemic, compared to a 2% gain for Germany and a 1% gain for Britain. Moreover, the extra debt Sweden has had to take on is a fraction of that of lockdown countries. So it will not have to spend decades paying for the costs of lockdowns.
Vaccinations by appointment only: Monday through Friday, 1 to 3:20 pm. To schedule an appointment for the COVID vaccination, visit ourshot.in.gov or call 211.
Testing by appointment only: Monday through Friday, 9 to 11:45 am. To schedule an appointment for testing, visit scheduling.coronavirus.IN.gov or call 211.
Key Points
Vaccinations do not provide immunity nor prevent transmission. They may lessen the severity of the symptoms. Other available drugs may lessen symptons as well.
Per CDC, 95% of deaths included a co-morbidity; 75% had four co-morbidities.
Dr. Peter McCullough: “Vaccines are largely unnecessary and if there was a safe and effective vaccine – if … the only application, in my view, would be our high-risk seniors, those in nursing homes, congregate living centers. Potentially, direct health care workers for our seniors. That’s it,” he said. “In the United States, that’s fewer than 3 million people would ever get a vaccine. I think we’ve seen the end of a broad employment of vaccines. It’s obviously backfired. Vaccination should only be narrow and targeted for highest risk group.”
The PCR test can produce false positives and is no longer recommended by the CDC; On deaths, it is unknown how many people died “With” Covid as opposed to “From “ Covid.
The strategic focus has been on the “number of cases” – not on: (1) The protection of the most vulnerable, (2) The survivability rates by groups – near 100% in the younger and healthier citizens, (3) Available treatments for the unvaccinated that lead to natural immunity, (4) Adverse effects in the near, mid and long-term.
Focused Protection was advocated by the signers of the Great Barrington Declaration (Oct 4, 2020). Florida adopted this strategy which protects high-risk individuals and supports vaccinations that were made available beginnning Dec 14, 2020 (Wikipedia). Florida also supports treatments for the unvaccinated. The strategy does not include mandates or shutdowns.
Summary Updated Jan 24, 2022
National, State and Local Covid policies can be improved. Should the intent of policies be that 100% of people survive the virus and its variants with no adverse effects?What can be done to “prevent” infections? Adverse effects would include negative impacts in areas that include: medical (physical and mental health), economic, political, social, and cultural.
El – Salvador – ad campaign to help prevent deaths and hospitalizations. “Where the eff is our American medical establishment producing content like this? HHS, FDA, CDC?” pic.twitter.com/XUTMkQF097 – — Benny (@bennyjohnson) January 5, 2022
An optimal strategy would support the pursuit of “Truth” e.g., the right answers. This would include breaking -down the issues, prioritize, and provide a variety of solutions. What individuals and groups are at the most risk? Who are at the least risk? What data is needed to assess progress? This would include listening to those experts that challenge the prevailing narratives.
Polices that divide people (mandates for example) are always suboptimal, as is canceling and censoring experts that challenge the prevailing narrative. On the number of cases, this is an output measure – not outcome. Positive outcome indicators would include no deaths and no adverse effects.
At a national level, what was the process for approving a vaccine and monitoring its efficacy? What is the criteria for concluding that vaccines are not meeting requirements ? On approving the Covid vaccinations, what were the deviations from past practices and their associated risks and mitigation factors? Why is VAERS data ignored? Information in VAERS provides a leading indicator that effects may be leading to a systemic increase in mortality rates in some categories. One life insurance company has already reported an unexpected and unprecedented level of deaths. Will this be a trend?
Bottom Line – From a quality management perspective, I would not give Indiana an “Incomplete.” I would give Florida a B. An “A” grade would include criteria that citizens have trust and confidence in policies and are provided the information that they need to assess that the policies are working – that the government is doing everything they can to support individual decision making. The politization of the issues undermines credibility and trust.
Politics
Media Allies Set Stage For Biden’s Pivot On Vaccine Mandate, tippinsights Editorial Board the N.Y. Timespublished a Page One story by their star healthcare reporter Apoorva Mandavilli: The C.D.C.’s New Challenge? Grappling With Imperfect Science. Nobody expects the Times to say in as many words that the vaccine skeptics are now partially vindicated. But the article came as close to conceding it as never before.
Stop the Mandate Rally. Dr. Malone mentioned that half the doctors that spoke at the rally identified as Democrats. A truly non-partisan pushback on national Covid policies.
A Second Opinion. Discussion begins around 40 minute mark. Sen. Ron Johnson moderates a panel discussion, A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term. More at www.ronjohnson.senate.gov
National Policies – Actions and Reactions
Incriminating evidence.Please ask your doctor to explain to us how we got it wrong. We’d love to be shown we are wrong. But none of the health authorities want to talk to us for some reason. Not even for $1M. Steve Kirsch
Governor Newsom developed Guillain-Barré within days after his booster. Because I had so many credible sources for this hypothesis (including several doctors), I was willing to risk $5M to prove I was right. I offered Gavin Newsom $5M to prove to the world he was not vaccine injured by just giving me a list of the doctors who treated him post-vaccination and he refused.
Qimron tears apart the deceit and lies spun by the government and the propaganda media calling the ruling class miserable failures unwilling to admit to any mistakes. Although his target is Israel’s rulers, it applies to the global agenda being put into place around the world, including America.
The push to test everyone with flawed and ineffective tests has failed, the idea that experimental jabs are better than natural immunity is a lie and the fact that certain groups (older, multiple comorbidities) are more at risk has been ignored as the rulers insisted on locking down everyone, Qimron notes.
An MIT scientist is warning of possible long-term damage to the brain from COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, saying it’s likely there will be an “alarming” rise in several major neurodegenerative diseases.
The U.S. medical strategy has focused almost exclusively on vaccines. A relentless stream of “breakthrough” infections, newsafety concerns, and the continual emergence of new mutations suggest that doubling down on failing strategies not only leads to public frustration. It also inhibits us from exploring alternatives. Doing more of the same in the face of the omicron crisis does not evoke confidence or gain the public’s trust.
We must reinvigorate new science that explores all evidence-based pathways to immunity. Natural infection and traditional vaccines, such as inactivated/dead virus, should be properly compared to mRNA and recombinant vaccines; the unvaccinated provide a much-needed control group in this regard. We also need a realistic testing plan that uses measures properly vetted by the regulatory agencies and provide standardized testing protocols globally. Celebrating progress is important. But let’s not celebrate our way to complacency. Evolving problems require creative new thinking.
Malone and Navarro warn, based on basic principles of virology, that universal vaccination could produce a “doomsday scenario.” … “The more you vaccinate, the more likely you will spawn vaccine-resistant mutations; and the more likely those vaccinated will fall prey to the mutations,” they write.
“Dr. Fauci also said that the world is still in the first of what he considered to be the five phases of the pandemic. The first is the ‘truly pandemic’ phase, ‘where the whole world is really very negatively impacted,’ followed by deceleration, control, elimination and eradication,” The Times reported.
El – Salvador – ad campaign to help prevent deaths and hospitalizations. “Where the eff is our American medical establishment producing content like this? HHS, FDA, CDC?” pic.twitter.com/XUTMkQF097 – — Benny (@bennyjohnson) January 5, 2022
E.U. admits frequent booster shots WEAKEN body’s immune system. …. the European Union’s top health agency is warning that getting boosted ever four months could harm the immune system’s ability to fight off the disease. .. The European Medicines Agency advised countries instead to mirror the seasonal influenza vaccination strategy tied to the onset of the cold season, Bloomberg News reported.
Tests. As of Dec 31, 2021, CDC is phasing out the PCR test for more accurate options. “CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.”
Indiana. As of Jan 6, 2021.Rapid antigen tests are only available at some locations for anyone age 18 and younger and symptomatic individuals age 50 and older due to the limited supply. PCR tests with results in two or three days are available for everyone, regardless of age or symptoms.
Deaths Co-Morbidities. Per CDC, Covid identifed as the underlying cause of death listed on the death certificate. There were co-morbidities or other conditions listed on the death certificate for as many as 95% of all Covid deaths. Obesity worsens outcomes from Covid-19.
Covid Policy – A suggested Course of Action (Solution).The Great Barrington Declaration– “The single document that will go down as one of the most important publications in the pandemic” –Dr. Scott Atlas, American physician and healthcare policy expert, Former White House Coronavirus Response team member. Barrington Policy adopted by Sweden and Florida.
Dominic Cummings, scientists and the media successfully demonised anyone who questioned the lockdown.
As we all now know, Cummings and Farrar got their way in the UK. We Great Barrington Declaration authors failed to sway any politicians, except Florida governor Ron DeSantis. Governments worldwide re-imposed lockdowns in the autumn and winter of 2020. The lockdowns’ failure to control Covid’s spread was catastrophic. And they resulted in devastating collateral harms, especially to children, the working class in rich nations and the very poorest people in the developing world.
Their psychological, social and economic impact might have been justified from a collective-interest and life-saving standpoint if Covid represented an equal threat to all citizens.
it became clear that Covid-19 was almost exclusively a threat to the elderly (60+): in the last quarter of 2020, the mean age of those dying both with and of Covid-19 in the UK was 82.4, while by early 2020 the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) — the risk of actually dying if you catch Covid — in people under 60 was already known to be exceptionally low: 0.5 per cent or less. A paper written late in 2020 for the WHO by professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, one of the world’s foremost epidemiologists, then estimated that the IFR for those under 70 was even lower: 0.05%. As Woolhouse points out in his interview “people over 75 are an astonishing 10,000 times more at risk than those who are under 15”.
In early 2021, John Ioannidis published a paper claiming that there was no practical difference in epidemiological terms between countries that had locked down and those that hadn’t. Several other studies have appeared since then that confirm Ioannidis’s initial findings: see, for example, here, here and here.
According to a recent Collateral Global study, Covid deaths in nursing homes amount on average to a staggering 40% of all Covid deaths in Western countries, despite representing less than 1% of the population.
In view of this, it seems obvious that the focused protection approach championed by the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) — based on “allow[ing] those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk” — was the right course of action.
Lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19, according to a new analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins University.
“We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality,” the researchers wrote.
But the research paper said lockdowns did have “devastating effects” on the economy and contributed to numerous social ills. “They have contributed to reducing economic activity, raising unemployment, reducing schooling, causing political unrest, contributing to domestic violence, and undermining liberal democracy,” the report said.
Florida Surgeon General – Joseph Ladapo. “Vaccines are available. Treatments are available,” “If you do get COVID, get treated early.” Ladapo argued doctors haven’t made enough effort on the treatment side: “The other component that other states should adopt is both preventative and treatment. Makes me sad as a scientist and a doctor that more effort is not made to connect patients with treatments. That has cost many lives during the pandemic.”
“To Ladapo, being the “anti-Fauci” means “being considerate of the fact that health means more than avoiding a virus. It’s been a terrible time with social isolation, loneliness. What we’ve done to children has been criminal, disconnecting them from their peers and disrupting their education even though they’ve always been at low risk. There are multiple components of health.”
Reinforces how statistics can be used to sell a false narrative. Indiana is “last on list of safest states”? They (WalletHub) list the states with the lowest death rates as Alabama, Florida, DC, Alaska, Louisiana. These states have a combined median Survival Estimate Rate of 98.31%. Indiana’s median rate (Oct 6-Dec 16) is 98.44%. This is the percent of people that test positive and live. Ref: USAFacts.org
Indiana COVID-19 Data Report. The SO WHAT? Should the purpose of a “Report” also be to provide feedback to citizens as to what is working and what is not in response to Covid? Should this include identifying prevention measures, the types of treatments available and provided, estimated risks to citizens on vaccinations injuries as listed/identified in VAERS and other government sources) to citizens?
Isn’t the “ideal” solutions that are 100% effective without any side effects? This would require forums where scientific-based challenges to the prevailing narrative are welcome and would support the need for additional studies, data and analysis in making progress towards the ideal.
Quality of the Data. Indiana’s Attorney General recently challenged the quality of the Covid related data being reported by the State.
Rokita’s office provided a statement from the attorney general: “A lack of global standardization of the data and non-uniform use of criteria is an industry-wide management issue, not an Inspector General issue.”
“Dr. Lindsay Weaver, who said the state Department of Health had reviewed the VAERS data for Indiana and did not see any issues.”
“Hoosiers deserve transparency in reporting of Covid data so they can make their own medical decisions.”
“he went on to say the omicron variant is “a much milder variant” and the focus should be on deaths, not on the number of cases.”
What’s the definition of “fully-vaccinated”? Is a patient who received the vaccination considered “unvaccinated” until fifteen days have passed since the second jab? When do the most severe reactions to the vax occur?
CDC Manipulated Studies In Order to Prop Up Official COVID Narrative.By Dr. Joseph Mercola. Two studies published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — both of questionable quality — allow the agency to claim COVID vaccines are safer and more effective than they really are.
According to its latest Covid-19 update, the Alberta Government admitted to following the fraudulent standard that was in use by vaccine manufacturers during clinical trials – which is to ignore the adverse outcomes, including Covid infection, hospitalizations, and deaths, for fourteen days after vaccine administration – no matter how many doses they have had.
Questions on Data Quality
What is the variation in how positive cases and deaths are tallied? Why are the adverse effects from the vaccines underreported in VAERS? What is the accuracy rate of the various tests?
Operational Definitions are critical in providing some assurance regarding the quality of the information being reported.
Omnicron: How likely is Omicron to deliver not an irritating cold but the worst flu of your life? How does that risk increase with the number and severity of medical conditions a person has? What are the chances of lingering symptoms following a mild illness? How long does immunity last after a booster shot or an infection?Ref: The New Yorker. What is the effect on those with natural immunity?
Not shown in the State reports or provided is the additional number and percent of citizens that recovered from Covid and have natural immunity.
Adverse Effects. What are the known side-effects from the vaccines? What are the know side-effects from those that were unvaxxed but recovered, e.g., such as no sense of smell or taste?
What are the adverse effects from the vaccine reported in VAERS? What percent of adverse reactions are reported in Indiana?
On “New Positive Cases,” how many were vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Of those that were vaccinated and contracted a new variant, what are the treatment protocols? For the unvaccinated with or without natural immunity, what are the recommended treatment protocols?
Of the deaths, how many of these were individuals with comorbidities? What were the ages? How many were vaccinated vs unvaccinated? For the unvaccinated, how many had natural immunity?
Answer : The CDC Reports that there were co-morbidities or other conditions listed on the death certificate for as many as 95% of all Covid deaths. Obesity worsens outcomes from Covid-19. CDC Director states over 75% of COVID Deaths In Vaccinated Had ‘At Least 4 Comorbidities’
Does the state (or “county health department”) support supplementing your diet with Vitamin D, C, and Zinc? Other recommendations? Is there correlation to mortality and obesity?
Does the current reporting infer that ALL citizens should be vaccinated? If so, this is most likely an unrealistic goal and does not provide the quality of information citizens need to make informed decisions on vaccinations. Individuals throughout the country are leaving their jobs when given the ultimatum to get vaccinated.
Predicted high court review of rule challenge will happen before regular court return.
Jan 7, 2022. Supreme Court. The liberal justices’ lies reveal the left’s addiction to virus fears By Jonathan S. Tobin. The high-court hearing wasn’t just fodder for a fact check that earned liberal judges scorn. It should be a wake-up call for the rest of us to understand that the real problem here isn’t a disease. It’s the way those who ought to know better have gone along with fearmongering intended to quash opposition to the most heavy-handed COVID regulations regardless of the truth.
Available Treatments? The supported treatments in Indiana for the unvaccinated that contract Covid is the Monoclonal Antibody Therapy – funded by the Feds. This option has recently been “paused” by the federal government. Why would you take this option off the table? How many states (other than Florida), will step-up to fund this treatment?
Doctors Outraged After Biden Regime Shuts Down Life-Saving Monoclonal Antibody Treatments By Debra Heine, In a letter addressed to Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra Tuesday, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo accused the Biden administration of “actively preventing the effective distribution of monoclonal antibody treatments,” undermining Florida’s strategy to handle the disease.
“We are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated — for themselves, their families and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm,” – President Biden
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is demanding the Biden administration reverse its decision to revoke emergency use authorization for Regeneron and Eli Lilly monoclonal antibody treatments.
Treatment Options for Individuals.“Early Detection and Treatment (within 72 hours) helps to prevent hospitalization – Dr. Peter McCullough
Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) world wide – Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University The infection fatality rate (IFR), the probability of dying for a person who is infected, is one of the most critical and most contested features of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The expected total mortality burden of COVID-19 is directly related to the IFR. Moreover, justification for various non-pharmacological public health interventions depends crucially on the IFR. Some aggressive interventions that potentially induce also more pronounced collateral harms may be considered appropriate, if IFR is high. Conversely, the same measures may fall short of acceptable risk-benefit thresholds, if the IFR is low. “Extrapolating from confirmed cases, he (Dr. Ioannidis) concluded that, around the world, more than half a billion people have probably been infected with COVID. Using that metric, Dr. Ioannidis concluded that most locations around the world have an IFR that’s less than 0.20%.
State Percentages – Estimated Survival Rate – Is the inferred goal a 100% survival rate? (Note: (11/29/21) Statistical significance can be derived from a calculation. Significance by itself is subjective. I did not calculate “statistical significance.” I leave this up to the statisticians.
(Positive Cases/Deaths)
10/6/2021: 98.47%;
10/13/2021: 98.44%
10/21/2021: 98.42%
10/27/2021: 98.41%
11/4/2021: 98.41%
11/11/2021: 98.43%
11/17/2021: 98.44%
11/23/2021: 98.45%
12/8/2021: 98.47%
12/16/2021: 98.50%
12/21/2021: 98.50%
1/2/2022: 98.56%
1/6/2022: 98.57% “RED”
1/13/2022: 98.63% “RED”
1/19/2022: 98.68% “RED” Upward ‘Trend”
1/26/2022: 98.72% “RED” Slight upward increase
2/3/2022: 98.72% RED
2/9/2022: 98.82%
Median: 98.49%
In addition to a run chart (see interpretation rules below), the application of a few more basic tools of quality would be helpful. In addition to baseline data, what is not typically provided is the stratification of cases that would include country, age, gender, level of fitness, co-morbidities, preventive measures taken, treatment protocols, et.al This would provide the data needed to offer a range of successful options.
Cause-effect diagrams and Pareto charts are also helpful tools in identifying improvement opportunities.
Also missing in the discussion are the system diagrams that identify the “end-to-end” process – from vaccine development, approval, and deployment through eradication. Documentation of the end-to-end process also applies to the other treatment options using available drugs. This would help identify the data needed throughout the process to compare the “ideal” – solutions that are 100% effective without any side effects, with the actual situation. This would require forums where scientific-based challenges to the narrative are welcome and would support the need for additional studies, data and analysis in making progress towards the ideal.
The most common misuse of statistics is when based on the numbers, a judgment is made that something is increasing or decreasing. What is generally unknown is that there are standards pioneered in America and accepted internationally for identifying trends.
Generally, you need 20-25 data points that can then be placed on a Run Chart along with the median (center-line). Depending on the standard, the following trends would indicate an increase or decrease and if it was sustained, would indicate a systemic change: Six (6) consecutive points in a row rising or falling; Eight (8) consecutive points in a row above or below the centerline. The simplest standard is the Rule of 7 – 7 data points in a row increasing or decreasing or 7 in a row above or below the centerline. (PQ Systems Trends)
Feb 9, 2022. BCM Facebook Post. State Weekly Covid Report as of Feb 9, 2022. Covid Recovry Rate (Name change from “Survival Rate Estimate”: 98.82% (upward trend). Shouldn’t the goal be that 100% of people survive the virus and its variants with no adverse effects?If so, how are we doing on that?
Feb 3, 2022. BCM Facebook Post. Survival Rate Estimate: 98.72% (upward trend). Shouldn’t the goal be that 100% of people survive the virus and its variants with no adverse effects?If so, whow are doing on that?
Jan 26, 2022. BCM Facebook Post. State Weekly Covid Report as of Jan 26, 2022. Survival Rate Estimate: 98.72% (upward trend). Shouldn’t the goal be that 100% of people survive the virus and its variants with no adverse effects?If so, whow are doing on that? Per BCD, total deaths for Brown County is 58 (up 2). The percentage of residents who are now partially vaccinated remains at 57.
(Positive cases: 1,604, 072; Total Deaths: 20, 508). Per BCD, total deaths for Brown County is 58 ( (up 7). Partially vaccinated rate at 57%.
Jan 19, 2022. BCM Facebook Post. State Weekly Covid Report as of Jan 19, 2022. Survival Rate Estimate: 98.68% (upward trend). Shouldn’t the goal be that 100% of people survive the virus and its variants with no adverse effects? Per BCD, total deaths for Brown County is 56 (up 2). The percentage of residents who are now partially vaccinated is 57 percent (no change from last week).
State Weekly Covid Report as of Jan 13, 2022. Survival Rate Estimate: 98.63% (Positive cases: 1,425, 877; Total Deaths: 19,491). Per BCD, total deaths for Brown County is 54 (up 3). The percentage of residents who are now partially vaccinated is now 57 percent. The CDC Reports that there were co-morbidities or other conditions listed on the death certificate for as many as 95% of all Covid deaths. Obesity worsens outcomes from Covid-19.
Per CDC, There were co-morbidities or other conditions listed on the death certificate for as many as 95% of all Covid deaths. Obesity worsens outcomes from Covid-19.
Survival Rate Estimate: 98.47% (Positive cases: 1,145,633; Total Deaths: 17,351). The percentage of the Brown County is 55 percent.
NEW. Brown County Survival Estimate Rate: 97.3% (Positive cases 1,826; Deaths 50).
County vaccination rate: 55%
Nov 17-23, 2021.
Survival Rate Estimate: 98.45% (Positive cases: 1,084,488; Total Deaths: 16, 805). The percentage of the Brown County is 54 percent. No statistically signficant change over the past 7 weeks.
NEW. Brown County Survival Estimate Rate: 97.1% (Positive cases 1,697; Deaths 50).
Nov 17, 2021.
Survival Rate Estimate: 98.44% (Positive cases: 1,069,450; Total Deaths: 16, 673). The percentage of those who are partially vaccinated as of Nov. 17 is now 54 percent. No statistically signficant change over the past 6 weeks.
Nov 11, 2021.
Survival Rate Estimate: 98.43% (Positive cases: 1,047,847; Total Deaths: 16, 447). County vaccination rate is 53%. No statistically signficant change over the past 5 weeks.
Nov 4, 2021
Survival Rate Estimate: 98.41% (Positive cases: 1,030,291; Total Deaths: 16, 336). County vaccination rate is 53%. No statistically signficant change over the past month.
Estimated Survival Rate: 98.41% (Positive cases: 1,016,722; Total Deaths: 16,117)
IFR: 1.59%
Oct 21, 2021.
Survival Rate: 98.42% (Positive cases: 1,007, 681; Total Deaths: 15,930)
Using the recent population data from the 2020 Census, which shows the county’s population to be 15,475, the percentage of those who are partially vaccinated dropped to around 52 percent.
ANSI G1 – A New Baseline for Testing Efficiency and Effectiveness of Government
In March 2021, the American National Standards Institute published a new professional standard to define the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations, ASQ/ANSI: G1 2021. One of the principal authors of this new standard, Richard Mallory, provides an overview of what it is, how it can be used, and why it is destined to be the primary focus of quality practices in government in the future.
No true value. There is no true value of any characteristic, state, or condition that is defined in terms of measurement or observation. Change of procedure for a measurement (change in operational definition) or observation produces a new number…
The most common misuse of statistics is when based on the numbers, a judgment is made that something is increasing or decreasing. What is generally unknown is that there are standards pioneered in America and accepted internationally for assessing trends.
Generally, you need 20-25 data points that can then be placed on a run chart along with the median (center-line). Depending on the standard, the following criteria would indicate an increase or decrease and if it was sustained, might indicate a systemic change:
Six (6) Consecutive Points in a row rising or falling;
Eight (8) Consecutive Points in a row above or below the centerline.
The simplest standard is the rule of 7 – 7 data points in a row increasing or decreasing or 7 in a row above or below the centerline. (PQ Systems Trends)
Background Info – overview of quality management concepts, principles, methods and tools – Success through Quality
LinkedIn – Covid – Misuse of Control Charts by Dr. Tony Burns Misuse of Process Behavior Charts is rife. An example of such misuse is the many attempts to use Process Behavior Charts for Covid data.
“Down the Rabbit Hole”have shown how the right approach is Professor Deming’s “Operational Definition”, or what Dr Shewhart called “Operational Meaning”:
What do you want to accomplish?
By what method will you accomplish your objective?
How will you know when you have accomplished your objective?
The first step is to ask, what are you trying to achieve? Professor Deming wanted to know if the processes he was studying were running at their maximum potential. He also asked whether these processes would continue to run at their maximum potential into the future. The tool he chose was the Shewhart Chart.
The first step with Covid data should be to ask “What do you want to accomplish?” Folk trying to draw control charts for Covid data have not asked this question.
What we want to know about Covid is whether it is getting better or worse. What we want to accomplish is a downward trend. The best method to observe such trends is the Run Chart, or Bar Chart.
Control Charts cannot help answer this question. All that a control chart can show is that the data is non-homogeneous. However we already know this because of the way the disease is spread from one person to many more people.
Control charts are ideal for bringing a process to its full potential and ensuring good quality into the future. They are worthless for COVID-19 data. Use a run/bar chart as shown. Run charts are ideal for showing trends.
“How will you know when you have accomplished your objective?” We will know this when the Run Chart trends to zero.
The root cause for the ubiquitous misuse of Process Behavior Charts is firstly courses failing to teach the fundamentals of Quality. The second cause is statistical software which encourages the blind pressing of buttons without thinking. When you have bought an expensive hammer, don’t spend your time looking for things to use it on. Use common sense instead. THINK.
KEEP IT SIMPLE
“But, as we have seen, an epidemic is anything but a steady-state system. It grows, changes, and evolves. We do not need to ask the question “Has a change occurred?” because we know that by its very nature every epidemic is constantly changing. This is why any attempt to use a process behavior chart to analyze the daily Covid values is a misapplication of the technique. It is conceptually equivalent to someone computing the average for a list of telephone numbers.” – Dr Wheeler.
With the exception of the individual choices we make to shape our own destinies,
the choices made by the leaders we interact with throughout our life journeys have the
most profound impact on every aspect of our existence. On the battlefield, the survival of
our soldiers, and, by proxy, our citizens and our society; in business, our job satisfaction,
our productivity, and our company’s, countries, and kinfolk’s potential to thrive; and over
time, the success or failure of our species in our on-going quest to evolve. “The way” we
choose to lead and organize ourselves irrevocably influences our potential to survive,
thrive, and evolve. Leadership Matters.
The time-line of the decisions leading up to the collapse of Afghanistan reveals
that the key leaders involved lack some of the most important qualities needed by those
who lead and govern: a common sense of shared purpose, the ability to make sense of
what’s going on around them, the ability to listen to their people and anticipate unfolding
events, the capacity to make sensible choices based on incomplete information, and the
flexibility and willingness to change their mind based on “the adaptive stimulus of what’s
going on around them.” Their collective incompetence not only changed world history, it
also changed our species evolutionary history by causing the deaths of at least 13
American freedom fighters along with thousands of freedom-loving Afghans, while
enabling hundreds of the world’s most despicable terrorists to survive, thrive, and evolve
into the future.
Note on Time-Line: This timeline is a living document, as key information continues to come out we will continuously update the time-line as appropriate)
The Gateway Pundit is pleased to announce its unveiling of www.AmericanGULAG.org, an informational site about the more than six hundred and thirty (630) people Joe Biden continues to imprison and persecute, largely for entering a public building on January 6, 2021.
The overwhelming majority of Biden’s January 6th political prisoners are peaceful patriots, mothers, fathers, grandmothers, grandfathers, sisters and brothers whose crime was walking into a public building to protest. The emerging totalitarian uniparty decided to weaponize the Department of Injustice and persecute Donald Trump/America First/anti-oligarchy supporters.
The electorate itself is divided, but doesn’t necessarily view this issue as an either/or choice. Polling shows that a large majority of Americans support the idea of examining the causes of boththe 2020 summer riots in America’s cities and the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.
It is clear, then, that many Americans see two sides to this story. In keeping with its mission to fill gaps in press coverage, RealClearInvestigations is launching a running compendium of data, with hyperlinked sourcing, comparing the damage done on Jan. 6, and the subsequent treatment of those accused of perpetrating it, with two other recent events: the summer 2020 riots and – in some ways a closer analogy – the all-but-forgotten riot in Washington on Inauguration Day 2017, as protesters challenged Donald Trump’s election and legitimacy much as Jan. 6 rioters challenged Joe Biden’s.
Many Democrats have called Jan. 6 a worse attack on America than 9/11, and Carlson shows how the government has linked the two, creating “Domestic War on Terror 2.0.”
The left, he says, is now using 1/6 “as a pretext to strip millions of Americans of their constitutional rights and defame them.”
Brown County Matters is a private Facebook Group requiring members to live, work, or own property in the county. Posts are intended to be of local (county) interests. It has general rules of expected behavior and the respective rule (s) are cited when a post is removed. Individuals are also blocked from the site when their contributions tend to be more disingenuous than constructive.
My perspective on the differences derived from the posts on the Election and Covid policy topics are provided below.
Left Perspective
From a “Left” perspective, the integrity of the 2020 Indiana and Presidential election should not be questioned and the Covid policy is not debatable or questionable. On Covid policy and vaccines, the conclusion from the Left is that “its settled science, shut up, get the shot (s), do what your told, and don’t question who we identify as the “experts.”
The First Amendment allows individuals to express their opinions. Any sources of information not approved by the government, local gatekeepers, or the “fact/bias” checkers (that claim to be non-partisan and independent) represents misinformation. It is interesting when the word “harmful” is associated with some information posted inferring adults are not capable of determining the quality of the information provided. And it begs the question: Who determines what information should be disseminated and how?
All original posts on BCM must align with the rules but replies to posts can include an alternative point of view regarding the message. Multiple sources of information are always helpful in validating information and identifying patterns. And, individuals do criticize the quality of a post to include posting counter information as to what they believe to be misinformation.
For example, in reply to the local school mask policy, I posted a video by Dr. Dan Stock to the Mt. Vernon school board advising against masks. This was considered “misinformation.” Other members posted criticisms by other doctors of Dr. Stocks position – all good. An online interview was then arranged by an independent party that allowed a discussion between Dr. Stock and one of his critics – very civil, professional, and informative. This type of discussion should be encourage – not suppressed. I would like to see follow-on discussions where viewers could ask questions and more detail can be discussed on the various aspects of the issue. For more info: Dr. Dan Stock addressed the Mt. Vernon School Board in Indiana.
Anyone (the messenger) questioning the Lefts narrative on many topics may be immediately attacked, cancelled, bullied, or labeled in a derogatory manner. The “message” that challenges the prevailing narrative is rarely discussed by the critics and would require a little more thought and analysis. It’s much easier to just attack the messenger, claim fake news or bias, question motives or just avoid the subject and debate. Critics are also subject to projection – projecting their own faults onto other people.
Another example of this is an article posted in the Brown County Democrat – Real threat to America isn’t Afghan refugees” that attacks anyone that disagrees with the left leaning author who also happens to be a director of Franklin College’s Pulliam School of Journalism.
In addition to projection, another common attribute of the Left is “virtue signaling” defined as “the sharing of one’s point of view on a social or political issue, often on social media, in order to garner praise or acknowledgment of one’s righteousness from others who share that point of view, or to passively rebuke those who do not.”
On the integrity of the Indiana election issues, I included a link to an article that discussed similar issues on the national election – The big ‘known unknown’ of 2020 by J. E Dyer at Liberty Unyielding. The author is a retired Naval Intelligence officer and offers a unique, objective, and broad perspective on many issues. Liberty Unyielding and the author were labeled as representing the “right wing fringe.”
Right Perspective
From what is being labeled as a “Right” perspective, our system of government enables citizens to work together to achieve a more perfect Union. This can be achieved by developing more perfect (better) policies. This requires an open forum and ground rules to discuss all relevant information and perspectives.
In the case of Covid, medical professionals locally as well as throughout the word have diverse and often opposing points of view regarding causes, prevention, treatments and policies. Another subject of disagreement is on natural and herd immunity.
Many medical professionals that question the approved narrative are “canceled” and/or censored and accused of providing misleading information. What has been missing is an open forum that addresses questions, acknowledges the differences, identifies area of agreement and disagreement, and then identifies the information needed to continually develop and improve upon the best solutions. This process builds trust, confidence in leadership, and leads to the better solutions.
When working towards a solution, leaders can opt for a process where everyone can benefit, or choose a win/lose (zero-sum) approach which unfortunately, is the more common approach.
The position regarding national polices is often inferred by the Left as “We won the election and we’re doing things our way , go along or else.” This approach leads to opposition and suboptimal outcomes.
Conservative positions on elections raise issues on the capability of the respective systems and processes to ensure citizen that elections are fair and all legal votes are counted. This has led to the demand for forensic audits and legislative changes with the intent to improve the system for future elections. The American Society of Quality (ASQ) – Government Division has recently proposing an improved management system supporting election authorities to enhance trust and confidence in U.S. elections
Brown County Leader Network
In America by law, We the People are top management and are responsible for expecting and supporting changes that result in outcomes where everyone benefits or at least are not any worse off in the long-term. Unfortunately, this knowledge may not be commonly acknowledged due to the influence of the two-party system, lack of knowledge of history and civic education in the schools.
Thankfully, Brown County Schools do support civic education and student teams have won national competitions on their knowledge of Constitutional issues. More info: We the People – Brown County Schools.
Whereas, the League acknowledges painfully that America is a nation founded on racism. We must end white privilege and the myth of white supremacy if we are to become the nation we pledge to be …
We call for the end to racism in all forms. We call for a review of all county laws, directives and initiatives of all kinds by any agency or segment of county government to determine if any such laws, directives or initiatives have or could result in racism or inequality in any form. We call for the expeditious remediation of any such instances so found.
Jordan Peterson Debunks White Privilege “There’s nothing more racist than targeting an entire ethnic group with a collective crime regardless of the innocence or guilt of its individuals.”
On the banner image for Matters, there is a link to the Brown County Leader Network (BCLN). This site offers some principles, methods and tools in developing assessments and supporting improvements. In developing solutions that can lead to better outcomes, the stakeholder matrix is a useful tool. The matrix is used to identify everyone (stakeholders) effected by a change, the information or services they expect and the feedback they need and will use to assess results. This concept applied at a local or national level offers an alternative way of acknowledging differences and helping to develop support for solutions.
The BCLN site also provides an outline of a problem and decision-making process. This process aligns with the Justice system in helping to discover the truth and identify the best decisions. Facts and evidence are used to help identify a problem. The pros (prosecution), cons (defense) and risks are identified. Transparency along with the supporting documentation help develop support for the respective changes.
Civil War?
Regarding the ideologies of the Left and Right, Dennis Prager captures what he believes to be key attributes. “A Guide to Basic Differences Between Left and Right” Prager was also labeled as being part of the right wing fringe.
Prager makes a distinction between the traditionally defined “liberals” and the Left or Leftists. He consider the liberals and conservatives as natural allies. He also assesses that we are in the midst of a Civil War: “Either America survives and the left is defeated, or the left survives and America is defeated. It’s as simple as that. We are in a civil war; I pray it is not violent, although if it is, they have begun the violence. If you deny we are in a civil war, you’re having your head in the proverbial sand.”
The focus of the December 2019 issue o the Atlantic was on the topic of “How to Stop A Civil War. The August 13, 2021 issue includes a final article in series titled Will the U.S. Pass a Point of No Return? “Crossing the Rubicon: “If the United States, in recent years, has been tracking the decline and fall of Republican Rome, when do we pass the point of no return?”
“I have been predicting for years that something resembling a civil war will arise and something like Trumpists likely will carry the day in the short-term.”
As I have noted repeatedly, liberalism and leftism have virtually nothing in common. In fact, leftism is the enemy of liberalism – as a handful of liberals such as former New York Times writer Bari Weiss, former Young Turk Dave Rubin and others have come to recognize.
Context: Moral Authority – The Right Thing
An underlying basis for discussions is recognizing the moral authority that motivates ideology. What is the right thing, how is it determined, and by whom?
The secular design of the U.S. system of government was influenced by Judeo-Christian principles which accepts God as the moral authority. The Christian philosophy includes a belief that actions motivated by love lead to outcomes where everyone gains, or at least, are not any worse off in the long-term. The premise being that as more needs are met, there is less harm on people of needs that are not being met.
Governments also represents a “moral authority” in determining the right things where “Man” defines the moral code. For the U.S system of government, the intent of the founders was that the Power to identify the right things in working towards a more perfect Union, was to be managed on behalf of the citizens through a balance between the three branch of government, the federal government and the states. The length of the terms of office were staggered to help balance short term and long-term interests. Presidents are elected to 4 years, Senate 6, Congressman 2 and supreme court justices have lifetime appointments.
The Declaration of Independence identifies the commitment to the “self-evident truths” that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed …
Leftism (Marxism)
In contrast, political systems influenced by Marxist theory lead to a centralization of power inherent in socialist and communist based systems. Marx ‘s Communist Manifesto reinforced the strategy to divide people, exploit divisions and leverage their hate and rage to inspire revolutions that will lead to the Marx version of utopia – divide, conquer, terrorize, subjugate and control. Marx was raised in a Christian home but later abandoned God and associated with Satan. Marx declared: “I long to take vengeance on the One Who rules from above … We make war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of county, of patriotism.”
Another popular treatise of the Left for revolutionary change is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer – the “original radical that gained his own kingdom” – Hell.
As the newly elected atheist chaplain of Harvard University put it in The New York Times: “We don’t look to a god for answers. We are each other’s answers.” (1)
Mark Levin in his book American Marxism, makes the case that “the core elements of Marxist ideology are now pervasive in American society and culture” which includes critical race theory, and “escalation of repression and and censorship to silence opposing forces and enforce conformity.” Mathew Lohmeier, who recently resigned from the Air Force as a result of the fall-out from his book “Irresistible Revolutions – Marxism’s Goal of Conquest and the Unmaking of the American Military” also reinforces the threats from Marxist inspired ideology in the military and in American society.
The polarity between the left and the right is exacerbated by a lack of knowledge of history and civics. A counter to the belief that America’s founding started in 1619 vs 1776 is provided at the following: American Civics.
The American republic rests upon the foundation of “E Pluribus Unum” — out of many, one. Although the Founders knew from their own experience that a vast diversity in outlooks and opinions would be present among the country’s citizens, they understood that such diversity must rest upon principles and practices we hold in common. It is up to each generation to make sure that this foundational unity remains intact. This project on American Civics seeks to contribute to that worthy cause.
In summary, within Brown County, we have the same Left vs Right political divide that is prevalent throughout the country. We can choose the better approaches while acknowledging competing ideologies and philosophies in a respectful and constructive manner.
A Way Ahead. Raise awareness on the threats to our Republic, apply non-violent strategies proven successful by Martin Luther King and Gandhi, and apply the quality improvement principles, methods, tools.
He covers many of the key points – and “Massive Non-Compliance” is the counter. The threats include Leftism (against everything-isms), aka Marxism, enabled by government, media, big-tech, “woke” corporations and the anti-nationalists.
Lower levels of religious observance among Democratic Party activists — who are more likely to be atheists, agnostics or “nones” compared with their Republican counterparts — means that they must find meaning elsewhere. As the newly elected atheist chaplain of Harvard University put it in The New York Times: “We don’t look to a god for answers. We are each other’s answers.”
There is a certain freedom in letting go of the need to win an argument or claim victory over one’s opponents. Our fellow citizens do not need to be converted, and the world does not need to be made anew. …. This, I believe, is a better way to live, even as I admit that it is not so easy to hold one’s tongue (or tweets) when matters get contentious. But we can at least start by resisting that very human urge to make enemies of those who might otherwise become our friends.
Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act. -Bonhoeffer
This post contains dissenting opinions from the prevailing narratives associated with Covid policies, vaccines, mandates, and treatments. Over time, multiple sources of reporting may help identify trends and validation of the various allegations. They also help identify “questions” to help get to the truth of the issues.
Reference for the above Table: Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) world wide – Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University “Professor of Medicine (Stanford Prevention Research), of Epidemiology and Population Health. “Extrapolating from confirmed cases, he concluded that, around the world, more than half a billion people have probably been infected with COVID. Using that metric, Dr. Ioannidis concluded that most locations around the world have an IFR that’s less than 0.20%.Additionally, protecting vulnerable populations and treating people with appropriate medicines may further reduce mortality rates.”
Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) world wide – Dr. John Ioannidis, Stanford University The infection fatality rate (IFR), the probability of dying for a person who is infected, is one of the most critical and most contested features of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The expected total mortality burden of COVID-19 is directly related to the IFR. Moreover, justification for various non-pharmacological public health interventions depends crucially on the IFR. Some aggressive interventions that potentially induce also more pronounced collateral harms1 may be considered appropriate, if IFR is high. Conversely, the same measures may fall short of acceptable risk-benefit thresholds, if the IFR is low
Mass Formation is a phenomenon where societal anxieties over a common threat lead to less-than-sober groupthink due to strong community desire to combat the threat. The phenomenon can occur in any number of species – from mega-flock behaviors in birds, to ideological and narrative acceptances in humans.
A huge new study has found the risk of serious heart problems called myocarditis in men under 40 soars with each dose of a Covid mRNA vaccine – and is sharply higher than the risk from a coronavirus infection itself.
The study, which British researchers released in late December, showed that the risk of myocarditis almost doubled after the first Pfizer shot in men under 40. Then it doubled again after the second and doubled again after the third – to almost eight times the baseline risk.
“Negative efficacy.” Get used to that term, because every day more data suggests we are already in the vaccination twilight zone of all pain and no gain – just as with the lockdowns.
Consider the fact that the CEO of Indiana-based life insurance company OneAmerica, which has been around since 1877, revealed last week that the death rate among 18- to 64-year-old Hoosiers is up 40% from pre-pandemic levels.
96% of all Omicron cases in Germany among vaccinated:
AT A MINIMUM, based on my reading, one has to conclude that if this report holds and is confirmed by others in the dry world of life insurance actuaries, we have both a huge human tragedy and a profound public policy failure of the US Government and US HHS system to serve and protect the citizens that pay for this “service”.
IF this holds true, then the genetic vaccines so aggressively promoted have failed, and the clear federal campaign to prevent early treatment with lifesaving drugs has contributed to a massive, avoidable loss of life.
I just left a voice message for my friend Joe Ladapo. He is the one guy in America who could end all this bullshit instantly by some action in his state. I’ll let you know what he says.
“Our government is out of control on this [Covid response] and they are lawless. They completely disregard bioethics. They completely disregard the federal common rule.
These mandates of an experimental vaccine are explicitly illegal. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Nuremberg code. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Bellmont Report. They are flat-out illegal and they don’t care.
Hopefully, we are going to stop them before they take our kids.”
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky said in a separate interview that most children are not being hospitalized because of the virus. They are instead being hospitalized with separate health issues and are incidentally testing positive, she said.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been sued by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), which claims the agency is improperly withholding COVID-19 v-safe data from the American public.
As per the CDC, v-safe is an “active surveillance program to monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines during the period when the vaccines are authorized for use under Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and possibly early after vaccine licensure.”
First, everyone should appreciate that there was very little testing of the short- and long-term safety of this product, exactly what happened with COVID vaccines. Really good testing of a new drug should take many months or even years.
For example, how does the Pfizer drug compare with the Dr. George Fareed and Dr. Brian Tyson protocol? Well, Fareed and Tyson had many more patients (about 7,000) taking the drug combo and yet they had fewer hospitalizations (4) and the same number of deaths (0). So, you’re way better off with the Fareed and Tyson protocol. And the safety protocol of ivermectin after billions of uses globally is far better proven than for the Pfizer product.
Of importance, note that in the trials only 21% of people had a comorbidity, while in reality 94% of COVID deaths have at least one comorbidity, and the average number of underlying medical conditions is four.
According to the CDC, about 78% of people who have been hospitalized and needed a ventilator or died from COVID-19 have been overweight or obese.
When it comes to COVID in 2022, opt for prudence, not panic. Eat well, get enough vitamin D, exercise, wash your hands, engage with your friends, cough or sneeze in your elbow, and stay home if you are feeling unwell. If you do get sick, seek medical care immediately.
Live your life. After all, there are 14 more letters after omicron in the Greek alphabet.
The scientist who combined two widely available over-the-counter compounds that inhibited the novel coronavirus by 99% in early tests told WND he’s hopeful his treatment will be available “within months.”
“My prediction is that antiviral drug combinations, such as diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, will provide a similar level of benefit as Regeneron monoclonal antibodies, Pfizer and Merck antivirals, at less than 1/100 the cost of those therapies,” he told WND.
Hoffe decided to investigate the cause of their vaccine injuries and found that microscopic blood clots were the culprit. The doctor said that these blood clots occur in 50 percent of people who get a corona jab.
According to the doctor, the blood clots also explain his patients’ neurological disorders and lung problems. “These stings cause permanent damage. And the damage gets bigger after every shot.”
The reporting system for vaccine side effects of the American Centers for Disease Control, VAERS, counts almost one million confirmed side effects for the new Covid vaccines.
Doctor Malthouse explains that the number of cases registered with VAERS “has been shown only to represent 1% of what is happening in real life.”
In a letter addressed to Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra Tuesday, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo accused the Biden administration of “actively preventing the effective distribution of monoclonal antibody treatments,” undermining Florida’s strategy to handle the disease.
The Supreme Court has agreed to take up two vaccine mandate cases — the one involving OSHA and the one for health care workers (CMS).
It seems to me there are essentially two questions before the Court: Whether the federal government has the authority to mandate any vaccines, and if so, whether they have the authority to mandate these particular “vaccines” (hereafter referred to more accurately as “injections”).
Given these facts — and they are facts, which a highly paid team of lawyers ought to be able to dig up easily and document thoroughly — no rational argument exists for federal mandates.
See and hear a brilliant man expound on a subject that he has devoted himself to for an intense, almost two years — like a half a million other interested persons, take a look at the Rumble video of Joe Rogan’s interview of Peter McCullough MD of Dallas Texas—put up on December 15, 2021 here.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr: “They are never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine without getting liability protection. Now the emergency use authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and under the CARES Act.
So as long as you take an emergency use vaccine, you can’t sue them. Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children. Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine. That’s why they are going after the kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection.”
A study by Danish researchers finds that after 90 days, the COVID-19 vaccines will make you more likely to get infected from omicron, not less.
Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), a mechanism in which antibodies are unable to neutralize a virus but instead increase its ability to infect cells, making the disease worse.
Long before the release of the COVID vaccines, Fauci was emphasizing the importance of safety trials to screen for possible unintended consequences such as ADE, which he said in March 2020 could take a year to a year and a half.
The vaccines are bad news. Fifteen bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination; ages 28 to 95). The coroner or the public prosecutor didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths. The vaccines should be immediately halted.
No need to worry. It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.
My good friend Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, with whom we & others wrote a series of open letters to the European Medicines Agency, is utterly distraught. He & his colleague, a pathologist, have confirmed that, even in people who’ve died post-covid19 vaccination & where their death was not attributed to the adverse effects of vaccination, in almost all cases DID die as a result of vaccination.
Hundreds of millions of people are going to die of unrestrained tuberculosis, Epstein Barr virus, toxoplasmosis etc etc etc
AND on top of this, the daily accidental production of cancer cells, normally deleted swiftly by immune surveillance, before they can divide, ceases.
Rescue our civilization while there are innocents to save, ESPECIALLY our children & grandchildren.
Back in July of 2020, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer that he was banning all large gatherings in New York City except for Black Lives Matter protests. The month before, NPR featured a letter signed by dozens of health and public disease experts explaining that “white supremacy is a lethal public health issue” that needed to be dealt with as well as the coronavirus. Glenn Greenwald points to that nonsensical twist in lockdown history as the moment that “single-handedly destroyed trust in public health officials.”
This was a pivotal moment in the pandemic’s history: For 4 months, the message was clear and unrelenting: everyone must stay home. Those who leave – even to go to a deserted beach – are reckless sociopaths. It flipped overnight to endorse a mass protest movement liberals liked: https://t.co/SJUIz0dbOw — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) December 28, 2021
Vermont, with about 77% of the population vaccinated, has the nation’s highest rate, but local WCAX-TV reported Vermonters who take the rapid tests and test positive for COVID-19 are “clogging up emergency rooms.”
the World Health Organization officially acknowledged that the “gold standard” PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 has a high rate of false-positives that make it unreliable.
A famous, widely cited Israeli study that showed “natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization” was recently replicated in an independent study. Nonetheless, there has been a stubborn refusal by the part of the media to acknowledge natural immunity exists, and the overwhelming majority of Democrat voters do not believe that it works against Covid.
There are more football players with heart-related issues this year than in many other years before according to the data recorded by Transfermarkt. If we were to assume that all excess is caused by vaccinations, it would yield to around a 1 out of 600 chance for footballers to get a heart condition after vaccination.
While it can be difficult to find a doctor who is willing to actually treat COVID-19 with the FLCCC protocol, many of those who are willing are making full use of telemedicine.
You can find a listing of doctors who can prescribe ivermectin and other necessary medicines on the FLCCC website.
There are a variety of “masks” and they have different characteristics. As OSHA has stated, neither cloth masks nor surgical masks are designed to protect wearers from airborne pathogens, particularly respiratory viruses. The confidence intervals for the efficacy of cloth masks and surgical masks to slow the spread of respiratory viruses are poor. N95 masks fare only slightly better.
“The World Health Organization, for example, does not recommend masks for children under age 6. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control recommends against the use of masks for any children in primary school.”
We are getting closer to reality now: Children are not at statistical risk from Covid-19. Full stop. The survival rate of healthy children is on the order of 99.99995% (the infection survival rate overall is at least 99.995%). Covid deaths are one percent of annual deaths for those under age 18.
But the Arizona study at the center of the CDC’s back-to-school blitz turns out to have been profoundly misleading. “You can’t learn anything about the effects of school mask mandates from this study,” Jonathan Ketcham, a public-health economist at Arizona State University,
But the biggest advance in treatment of COVID-19, he said, is an oral nasal treatment that long has been used by doctors to treat viral and bacterial sinusitis.
The lead agent, he said, is sold as Betadine, which is 10% povidone iodine. It can be purchased at a pharmacy or online for about $10.
A small amount of Betadine can be squirted into a shot-glass sized container – enough to cover the bottom – and the rest of the glass can be filled with water.
The solution is administered in the nose with a nasal bulb or spray syringe.
“Squirt it up the nose over the sink. Sniff it back and then spit it out,” McCullough advised. “Do that in both nostrils and then gargle with the rest, spit it out in the sink.
“I tell you, that has a tremendous effect. People should do that after their Christmas dinner, their congregant setting, [after] they’ve been around people.”
He explained that the virus takes three to five days to multiply in the nose.
“So we should actually zap it right there in the nose before it gets a head start,” he said.
A study of the nasal treatment for COVID-19 showed it knocked down the PCR positivity from 303 to less than 30 in a few days, McCullough said, and there were virtually no hospitalizations. This kind of “nasal decontamination” has been done in Bangladesh, he noted, where there is virtually no COVID.
Food-grade hydrogen peroxide would be a “second best” substitute for anyone who doesn’t tolerate Betadine.
The Great Barrington Declaration is an example of an “outsider” group of scientists that have managed to expand the COVID-19 Overton window by use of a successful social media campaign. This declaration, now with almost one million signatures, reiterates sound, scientific principles regarding pandemic response policies that basically state the following:
“The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. “ -The Great Barrington Declaration
Natural immunity is providing good protection against Omicron
As the Gateway Pundit and several others have extensively reported, study after study shows that unvaccinated individuals also experience a robust immune response and high antibody levels – thanks to a little something called natural immunity – which predictably, is something the OHSU ‘experts’ conveniently and completely fail to mention in their research.
It’s no surprise that the OHSU researchers found out that recovering from Covid naturally after vaccination would be beneficial – just add their study to the list – but crediting the vaccine as having anything to do with it, is borderline laughable.
JOE BIDEN: “It’s here now, and it’s spreading and it’s going to increase. For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death if you’re unvaccinated. For themselves, their families and the hospital will soon overwhelm.” –
The unvaccinated pose no greater threat to the vaccine than the vaccine posed to them. And if they do, Joe Biden, why don’t you tell us how they do? But he can’t. No one can. That’s why they never explain it.
In fact, there’s quite a bit of evidence that the millions of Americans who’ve recovered from COVID and have natural immunity are safer than most people. They’ve relied on their own immune systems, and they’ve been rewarded for it. Joe Biden has never once acknowledged that these millions of people exist.
So what rational conclusions can we draw from what we’re seeing? At this point, none. CNN doesn’t want to talk about the COVID outbreak among vaccinated people in New York. They’d have to correct too many lies that they told. In any case, there are more Democratic voters in New York City than anywhere else in America, so there’s no reason to embarrass the base of their own party.
In the meantime, whatever personal decisions about the vaccine or COVID or how many masks you wear, if any, know what you’re watching here. This is not a public health campaign designed to save you from a variant that has not killed a single confirmed American. Sorry, it has not. No. So, what is this? These are the muscle spasms of a dying political party. The people in charge are on their way out. Unfortunately, they can still hurt you.
So that’s the official administration line: opened schools and businesses for the vaccinated and “severe illness and death” for the unvaccinated, who will overwhelm hospitals with the omicron variant and, by implication, bear responsibility for the pandemic from here on out.
It’s one of the most bizarre and appalling statements from a presidential administration in American history, breathtaking in its dishonest scapegoating and shocking in its callous disregard for the millions of Americans who have decided, for reasons of their own, not to get the Covid shots.
Bullying these people will not persuade them, and neither will lying about the omicron variant. There’s no evidence right now that omicron is going to bring “severe illness and death,” or that it’s even going to cause a surge in hospitalizations. The evidence so far suggests just the opposite.
So instead of freaking out about omicron, prognosticating death and doom for the unvaccinated, maybe it’s time to do what some states, like Florida and Texas, have been doing all along: work to protect the most vulnerable and prevent deaths, ensure hospitals don’t get overwhelmed, and keep schools and businesses open.
Never mind that many of the unvaccinated have already gotten and recovered from Covid, and have foregone the shot because they have natural immunity (a reality that never seems to factor into the Biden administration’s pandemic policies or messaging). Never mind that some people, having seen over the course of nearly two years that Covid is not as dangerous as the media and political elites have made it out to be and that Covid treatment has vastly improved, have assessed their risk and decided not to get the shots.
By Anthony Matoria, American Thinker, Dec 20, 2021
We are not inclined to hold that the statute establishes the absolute rule that an adult must be vaccinated if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that he is not at the time a fit subject of vaccination […]
On December 14th, 2021, Nature Medicine released a study based on a broad population data set analyzed by researchers at Oxford University. The researchers examined the risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination and infection.
The Oxford researchers reveal that 1 in 100 or 1% of all vaccinated individuals were admitted to the hospital or died with arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat.
From their inception, Dr. Monchy was very critical of the “experimental, never-before-used mRNA vaccines.” The Doctor disagreed with the vaccine’s “lack of a control group and long-term outcomes,” reports the Doctors Collective. Even more so, the Doctor is outraged that the injection is being promoted to children and pregnant women,
Standard ways of improving health are not encouraged, such as diet, exercise, and fresh air, but rather suppressed.
(LIFESITE NEWS) – A group that includes former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) on behalf of UK citizens against Boris Johnson and UK officials, Bill and Melinda Gates, chief executives of Big Pharma companies, World Economic Forum executive chairman Klaus Schwab, and others for crimes against humanity.
Everyone and their cousin were being categorized as dying from COVID – no matter what other conditions they had. Died of a heart attack – COVID death. Hit by a bus – COVID death. It really was that ridiculous. No matter what someone died of, if it was discovered they also had the coronavirus, his or her death was counted as a COVID statistic.
In fact the actual statistics developed earlier this year are that only 6% of people died from just contracting the virus. The other 94% of deaths had an average of over 2.5 co-morbidities – obesity, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure.
Fauci, Biden and their band of merry varianteers began to see their fear narrative dissipating around Thanksgiving. Cases had fallen from 175,000 per day in mid-September to the 70,000 range in late November, down 60% and far below the 255,000 cases per day in January 2021. The Delta variant was losing its mojo, and something needed to be done. They couldn’t let the masses think they could get back to normal. That wasn’t going to work with the Build Back Better Great Reset master plan.
I can only appeal to those willing to be jabbed by offering a simple-to-understand analogy: If you go to buy a new car and you are offered a new and experimental model with no guarantees whatsoever – would you buy it? And if you did, and it failed and you returned it to the dealer – would buy another on the same basis? I am left speechless at the idiocy and ignorance of my fellow Brits.
I’m going to make one more point and that’s this. How many people here have heard of Event 201?
This year we saw the destruction of the American Constitution. That Constitution was written by a group of people who understood that there are worse things than dying. And they put their lives on the front line, their property, their careers, their livelihoods, to fight for freedom, and to fight for those rights that we have lost in the previous 20 months.
And now it’s our job now, it is the job of everybody in this crowd, to go out and fight back, to resist, resist, resist, resist, and to reclaim our government, to reclaim our lives, to reclaim our liberty, for our children, for our country, and for all future generations.
And I can tell you this. I will stand side by side with you, and if I have to die for this, I’m going to die with my boots on.
It is common knowledge that normal vaccine development takes nearly ten years and can be done in as little as five years in rare cases. The current COVID-19 shots were developed in one year, skipping many crucial steps. For example, scientists did not perform animal testing, phases II and III were combined, EUA occurred after just two months, the trials were unblinded, and phase III is ongoing until 2023.
CCCA Insists the Vaccines Be Withdrawn Immediately. The experts declare it is clear that Pfizer – and the agencies overseeing their trials – failed to follow established, high-quality safety and efficacy protocols right from the beginning. The group asserts, “We have presented Level 1 evidence of harm from Pfizer’s own trial data. Any government which has approved these inoculations, much less mandated them, knew or should have known from the available data that harm would be caused to its citizens.”
The panel will listen to presentations by CDC officials on thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), which U.S. drug regulators say has a “causal relationship” with the jab, according to a draft agenda for the meeting.
A former adviser to the World Health Organization and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has compiled a list of more than 400 studies showing that COVID-19 lockdowns, shelter-in-place policies, school closures, masks and mask mandates have failed to curb virus transmission or reduce deaths.
If you do not have symptons, you can not pass on the virus.
We never needed to close down the schools or wear masks.
Once recovered from Covid-19, it’s one and done. Can’t get it again. No single case of re-infection. 41,000 vaccine failures – people died. Natural immunity is how we end the pandemic.
Illness is Treatable! Early treatment is key – day 1. Oral and Nasal spay and wash proving to be an effective preventive measure. Virus is in the nose. Vitamin, C, D, Zink, Ivermectin, HCL …. monoclonal anti-bodies …. infusion, predisone, aspirin (blood clotting) for 90 days, other…. Support: — Frontline Doctors …..
The vaccines we have …have not performed as expected. 90% was promise of effectivness, has not worked out. High rates of death with 48 hours, 80% within a week. Each shot is a gamble – too much spike protein causing injuries and death. VAERS results unacceptable. Agencies not protecting us. FOCUS – Protect our children. Vaccines are not enough to bring us out of the pandemic. NO MANDATES. Need Herd Immunity.
Immunity people enjoy after recovering from COVID-19 is better than the protection bestowed from vaccination, according to a new study from Israel.
Researchers analyzing data from the county’s health database from August to September found both COVID-19 infections and severe disease were higher among the vaccinated than those who recovered from the illness, also known as people with natural immunity.
Mass Formation Psychosis can account for the strange phenomenon of about 20-30% of the population in the western world becoming entranced with the Noble Lies and dominant narrative concerning the safety and effectiveness of the genetic vaccines, and both propagated and enforced by politicians, science bureaucrats, pharmaceutical companies and legacy media.
Just last week, July 21, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) made an announcement that destroys the entire COVID-19 narrative.
The CDC stated it was withdrawing the Emergency Use Authorization for the PCR tests after Dec. 31. The reason, explicitly stated, is the PCR test does not differentiate between the flu and COVID-19. This is the same test used since February of 2020.
“CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses,” the announcement states.
Great German research provides unequivocal medical evidence that the government should be strongly advocating two actions: 1) Taking vitamin D supplements, and 2) Having your blood tested for vitamin D.
The title for this October 2021 journal article says it all: “COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” (25(OH)D3 refers to metabolite of the vitamin in blood.)
In other words, there is clear evidence that the lower your vitamin D level the greater your risk of dying from COVID infection. Moreover, the data clearly show that you should have a blood level of at least 50 ng/mL.
Well, guess what? It has happened! Somehow we’re being told, in otherwise hushed tones, that the omicron variant of the original virus that causes COVID-19 (read China-Fauci flu) “may have picked up genetic material from another virus that causes the common cold,” the Washington Post reported Saturday
In a Friday press release by the Kyodo News Service, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare warned of myocarditis and pericarditis issues related to the mRNA COVID vaccines.
The Kyodo News Service is the Japanese equivalent of the AP or Reuters. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare is the Japanese equivalent of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, where the CDC is located.
This is a stunning development: the Japanese health services have determined that the mRNA vaccines may cause serious heart issues, and they are now alerted and gathering data on this issue. This follows many reports from small media outlets of athletes collapsing and some even dying after being vaccinated (see links to several such reports below). These reports were dismissed by the mainstream media, the administration, big business, and other leftists as unreliable. This announcement by Japan may now mainstream many of these reports, and those who have been vaccine averse may be vindicated by the science from a highly reliable source.
In a video interview with WND, he talks about a global “propaganda campaign” that includes the “hunting of physicians” to “try to delegitimize and damage the ability of physicians who are administering early, life-saving treatments.”
Among the many points he made (see the embedded video below) is the need to research why the tropical countries in Africa where HCQ and IVM are widely used have such minor death tolls from COVID. As you watch, examine the graph below:
He wrote on his Substack page: “The findings, in a nutshell: if you let your healthy child or teenager receive the mRNA Covid vaccine, you are insane.”
“By and large, it’s been a very selected pandemic, and predictable. It was very distinguished between young versus old, healthy versus chronic disease people. So we quickly learned who was at risk for the pandemic and who wasn’t,” he added.
“However, the fear was manufactured for everybody. And that’s what’s characterized the whole pandemic is that degree of fear and people’s response to the fear.”
“I’m looking at clinicians who have now treated more than 150,000 patients, with fewer than 2 dozen deaths, with #hydroxychloroquine.” Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, #Ivermectin & other therapeutics.
Risch has authored over 300 original peer-reviewed publications and was formerly a member of the board of editors for the American Journal of Epidemiology.
“All-cause mortality is key,” she adds. “If there is no improvement in all-cause mortality, nothing else matters.” Let’s take a look at the findings.
“Excess mortality is a term used in epidemiology and public health that refers to the number of deaths from all causes during a crisis above and beyond what we would have expected to see under ‘normal’ conditions,” the authors note.
“Excess mortality is measured as the difference between the reported number of deaths in a given week or month (depending on the country) in 2020–2021 and an estimate of the expected number of deaths for that period had the COVID-19 pandemic not occurred,” the authors define the term. … Furthermore, the Our World in Data breaks down the excess mortality with p-scores, which weight the data with additional factors. … “To better enable comparisons across countries, we measure excess mortality as the percentage difference between the reported and projected number of deaths. This metric is called the P-score…”
The Covid therapeutic drugs being marketed as “vaccines” may have benefit to certain at-risk populations, such as the elderly. … However, this is a far cry from vaccine mandates and the one-size-fits all policies being advocated under the failing Public Health Expert model.
Malone said the reason he is speaking out, in spite of the considerable personal risks, is simple. … “It’s because I’m bloody well pissed off. It’s not right, it’s not fair, it’s hurting people, it is breaking the rules, left and right, people are lying continuously, they’re manipulating data,” he said. “It’s shocking.”
“My wife and I are Central Coast Californians by birth and youth, and we actually come from slightly center-left on the political spectrum,” he told WND. … “But I’ve got to say, what we’ve observed live the last two years has completely changed our point of view on politics in the United States.
The risk of death from the injection is about three times higher for children and adolescents than death from COVID.
Japanese medical magazine Med Check examined the coronavirus vaccine’s serious side effects and deaths. The publication’s editor-in-chief, Rokuro Hama, revealed that in the elderly and health care workers, a disproportionate number of people died of various cardiovascular causes after the Covid gene-therapy jab compared to the general population. Furthermore, people in their twenties have seven times higher risk of death from vaccination than from COVID-19.
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, documents that show Pfizer and the FDA knew in early 2021 that mRNA vaccines were killing thousands of people and causing spontaneous abortions, as well as damaging three times more women than men.
FDA fought the court-ordered release of FDA files by arguing that its files should have been sealed for 55 years. The judge disagreed and ordered 500 documents a month to be released, and the first document included this bombshell titled, “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.“
The facts surrounding the Omicron variant are emerging day-by-day. CNN reported on November 30, 2021, “there is still a lot we don’t know about the Omicron variant, but scientists are racing to determine its severity, transmissibility and whether it evades current vaccines.”
High-risk patients who are vaccinated and the unvaccinated need protection in the form of therapeutics to treat symptoms.
Bill Gates’ Gavi Vaccine Alliance in 2018 published a paper on its INFUSE program that ought to be required reading for every parent of young children.
This document is guaranteed to give pause to any parent considering taking the advice of Dr. Anthony Fauci, their local public-school nurse or government-compliant pediatrician who insists they get their child jabbed.
Published more than a year before anyone had heard of Covid-19, the document explains why Fauci, Gates and the corrupt U.S. government are so intent on getting these “vaccines” into the bodies of younger and younger people.
The real purpose behind the historic, unprecedented push to vaccinate the very young, even against diseases like Covid that do not pose a threat to them, is to fold the current generation of children into the blossoming global digital identity system.
The great body of evidence (comparative research studies and high-quality pieces of evidence and reporting judged to be relevant to this analysis) shows that COVID-19 lockdowns, shelter-in-place policies, masks, school closures, and mask mandates have failed in their purpose of curbing transmission or reducing deaths. These restrictive policies were ineffective and devastating
Nearly all governments have attempted compulsory measures to control the virus, but no government can claim success. The research indicates that mask mandates, lockdowns, and school closures have had no discernible impact of virus trajectories.
Dr Alexander holds a PhD. He has experience in epidemiology and in the teaching clinical epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, and research methodology.
The newly discovered omicron mutation of the novel coronavirus will likely be a “minor” variant, according to epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.
He replied that with 99% of COVID cases now of the delta variant, “the vaccines are not keyed against delta, so they’re having a terrible time in terms of getting control.”
McCullough added that the omicron variant first reported last week arose among travelers in Botswana who were vaccinated.
“So I think it’s clear now that this variant is an evolutionary mistake that arose within the vaccinated.”
There are intense debates surrounding the vaccine, its efficacy, how long the immunity lasts — particularly as the virus evolves — its experimental nature, its “Emergency Use Authorization,” and its serious side effects and adverse reactions, including death, that have been well documented.
Further, the various vaccines are not “vaccines” as commonly understood but “gene therapy,” mRNA platforms that insert themselves into our DNA. They then harness our own cellular machinery to produce the infamous “spike protein” to be distributed throughout the body eliciting the immune response, but sometimes with devastating consequences, as we have learned. A vaccine generally takes four-six years of development before being released. The COVID vaccine coming out in just a few months meant bypassing the usual safeguards that serve to protect the public before a new drug or vaccine is brought to market.
People who have recovered from COVID-19 are at little risk of contracting the disease again, according to a study published last week. Researchers in Qatar examined a cohort of over 353,000 people using national databases that contain information about patients with polymerase-chain-reaction-confirmed infections.
The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. It was funded by Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar, Qatar’s Ministry of Public Health, the Hamad Medical Corp., and Sidra Medicine.
We all owe Atlas an enormous debt of gratitude, for it was he who persuaded the Florida governor to choose the path of focussed protection as advocated by the Great Barrington Declaration, which Atlas cites as the “single document that will go down as one of the most important publications in the pandemic, as it lent undeniable credibility to focused protection and provided courage to thousands of additional medical scientists and public health leaders to come forward.”
Collins told Fauci the declaration came from three “fringe” epidemiologists, meaning Dr. Martin Kulldorf of Harvard, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and Dr. Sunetra Gupta of Oxford.
Malone told WND the email showed the “hubris” of Collins, who doesn’t have the training and experience in epidemiology that the three scholars possess.
A former Pfizer employee, now working as a pharmaceutical marketing expert and biotech analyst, has provided evidence in a public meeting in September suggesting that Pfizer is aware that these shots can cause those vaccinated to be more prone to contracting COVID-19 and infections.
In the United Kingdom, excess mortality is off the charts. Despite this, nobody is willing to consider the Covid-19 vaccines as responsible for the deaths.
Professor Carl Heneghan and Cancer Expert said that the current situation in the country is a “national scandal.” Over the past several months, a shocking 9,300 more people than usual have died in Great Britain, and officials are blaming everything else except the jabs.
Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, the partners in manufacturing the Covishield (AstraZeneca) vaccine are made accused for their involvement in conspiracy.
Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccines, accused Dr. Faucistein and the CDC of lying about the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. he estimates 500,000 people died because they were denied the use of these drugs.
McCullough added, “The pandemic could have been over by now, he says, if those who tested positive for covid had been immediately treated before they fell ill enough to be hospitalized. He also says that thousands could have been, and still could be saved if the treatment protocol he and other physicians use were not suppressed.”
Early in the pandemic, together with a team of practicing physicians across the United States, I developed a protocol for the use of corticosteroids to treat COVID-19. At the time our public health agencies recommended against the use of corticosteroids—but we were soon vindicated, and corticosteroids are now part of the CDC’s recommended protocol.
As the pandemic wore on, we pooled our experience treating patients on the frontlines, and based on emerging data from academic studies, including peer-reviewed randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), we expanded our treatment protocol to employ various FDA-approved medicines. This includes fluvoxamine, methylprednisolone, ascorbic acid, thiamine, heparin, vitamin D, zinc, melatonin, and ivermectin.
I’ve used this treatment protocol to reduce COVID-19 deaths in my intensive care unit by up to 50 percent.
I’m going to quote the final sentence of the abstract which appears at the beginning of the article. This is all I, you – or anyone else – needs to know.
`We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination.’
That’s it. That’s the death bell for the covid-19 mRNA jabs.
he most up-to-date data by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which showed that children accounted for zero percent to 0.19% of all COVID-19 deaths, and 10 U.S. states reported zero child deaths.
He confirmed the data show the infection fatality rate for COVID is roughly similar to seasonal influenza. And he believes the COVID rate will be even lower once all the data are collected.
Further, Stanford University epidemiologist John P.A. Ioannidis, analyzing 36 studies along with an additional seven preliminary national estimates, has concluded the infection fatality rate around the world for those under 70 ranged from zero percent to 0.57%.
For children and young adults, the infection fatality rate is close to zero, pointed out Ioannidis, chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology at Stanford’s medical school.
`We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination.’
> One of the most commonly used tricks to make a drug look more effective than it is in a real-world setting is to conflate absolute and relative risk reduction. While AstraZeneca boasted a relative reduction of 100%, the absolute reduction was 0.01%. For the Pfizer shot, the relative risk reduction was initially 95%, but the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%
Last month, Merck and Ridgeback announced that molnupiravir could reduce by half the chances that a person infected by the coronavirus would need to be hospitalized. The drug was so overwhelmingly effective that an independent committee asked the researchers to stop their Phase III trial early—it would have been unethical to continue giving participants placebos. None of the nearly four hundred patients who received molnupiravir in the trial went on to die, and the drug had no major side effects. On November 4th, the U.K. became the first country to approve molnupiravir; many observers expect that an emergency-use authorization will come from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December.
In most of the United Kingdom, the New York Times reported, elementary school children and their teachers were not required to wear masks during the delta surge there earlier this year. …. A study of masked German schoolchildren published June 30 in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics found carbon dioxide content in “inhaled air” was at least three-fold higher than German law allows.
… in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this country’s most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDA’s response? It produced nothing. So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information. To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. Not one.
On Friday Dr. Fauci told The New York Times podcast that the vaccines did not work as advertised and that Americans are in danger due to their waning immunity.
A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with a fee to hospital by federal government.
Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
A 20% “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for the use of remdesivir instead of other medicines, such as ivermectin.
Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.
the New England Journal of Medicine concluded that the use of remdesivir in treating patients during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued ‘because mortality exceeded 50%.’ Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control published studies indicate a range of 71-75% adverse events caused by remdesivir (including liver and kidney damage), and many of the studies documented that remdesivir treatment had to be discontinued after 5-10 days because of adverse events or even worse, death.”
The federal government and health-care experts have denied that claim. But the president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division is on record describing the mRNA shots as “cell and gene therapy” and acknowledging public wariness of the technology.
“Dr. Joseph Mercola has been shunned by the mainstream for honestly calling the jabs what they are. In March, he wrote: “In short, they know labeling them as ‘gene therapies’ would be like slapping a skull and crossbones label on them. Most people have enough common sense to realize that gene therapy is a different ballgame from a regular vaccination, and might be a bad idea, especially for children and younger individuals.”
A New York attorney filed a FOIA request in September asking for “documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who (1) never received a Covid-19 vaccine; (2) was infected with Covid-19 once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.” …. The CDC responded: “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC Emergency Operation Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”
In comments to the paper, Memoli said that he supports COVID-19 vaccination in high-risk groups including obese people and the elderly. However, widespread vaccinations for people who have a low risk of death or severe illness from COVID-19 could hamper the U.S. population’s ability to develop more robust protection against the virus via previous infections, he said.
Facilitator – Margaret Menge. Told a story of an 18 year that contracted heart disease after the shot
Dr. Stock
Andrea Ford – concerned for child vaccininations – no justification, more risk than benefit. No inf on long-term consequences, but there will be an increase in certain illnesses
Lack of providing thorough information on informed consent
Refusal of treatment for the unvaccinated
Discrimination, harassment, hostile work environments, …. crimes against humanity
James Chrismore – Ge Aviation, Lafayette, IN 2:36 mark. Had his religious exemption accepted. Organizes resistance.
RN – Erin Berry – Medical Sales Rep. Fighting mandate. Religious exemption denied. Working on medical condition, natural immunity, denied exemption – may lose her job
DeAndra Dycus – sone shot – stray bullet – medical issues and care, was on a ventilator (no Covid), positive for flu, fight for your children, against mandates, did choose for her son to get vaccinated due to his heatlh issues. Be a momma bear
Bryan Ford – school teacher, special ed. Unvaxxed had to wear masks, Vaxed did not. 1,000 stipend for getting vaxed. quit. New School Superintendant. Bribe kids with new cars to get vaxed. Found new job. Everything great. No cases, no vax related stress. Do have to follow Fed and State requirements. Could sign a waiver against masks.
Thomas Michelor – Former IU student. IU Tyranny, mask mandate/wore Gas Mask in protest, felt humiliated, no student interaction, sense of fear, refused to wear mask, told to trust the experts, got suspended, hearing, no advocate, was suspended, left college. Was on a full-ride. Would not subit to tyranny.
Bailey. Rare brain cancer. Parents refused vaccinations. natural approach to medicine worked. Mother – 3yr old son. Divorced. Covid hit. Got a job working with children. Mask wear … incentives for vaccinated (time off), special recog on badges. Then vax was mandated for all or voluntary resigning. Filed medical exemption – was accepted. No accomodations. Suspended for 2 weeks – w/out pay. Received termination letter.Started new job – no mandates.
Ashley Grog. RN. Founder – Hoosiers for Medical Liberty. Collected thousands of stories for help with exemptions, and legislation, we are all grieving the lack of ethics and morals.
Video issues ….
Conspiracy? Defined as an agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act
Techno-Tyranny: How The US National Security State Is Using Coronavirus To Fulfill An Orwellian Vision. Last year, a government commission called for the US to adopt an AI-driven mass surveillance system far beyond that used in any other country in order to ensure American hegemony in artificial intelligence. Now, many of the “obstacles” they had cited as preventing its implementation are rapidly being removed under the guise of combating the coronavirus crisis. by BY WHITNEY WEBB
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla had an hour-long interview on Tuesday with Frederick Kemp of the Atlantic Council in which he calls mRNA shots a “gene editing,” which is an admission the mRNA jabs are not vaccines. Bourla also claims that scientists can “repair the mistakes” in DNA, or in other words they can play God.
By looking at the Atlantic Council’s website, it is a globalist and collectivist organization in the vein of the World Economic Forum.
One has to wonder what to think when the so-called “fact checkers,” like Reuters, has called anyone calling the jabs “gene editing” or “gene therapy” as spreading misinformation, yet you have the CEO of Pfizer calling it just that.
Dr. Joseph Mercola has been shunned by the mainstream for honestly calling the jabs what they are. In March, he wrote: “In short, they know labeling them as ‘gene therapies’ would be like slapping a skull and crossbones label on them. Most people have enough common sense to realize that gene therapy is a different ballgame from a regular vaccination, and might be a bad idea, especially for children and younger individuals.”
What should be noted is that Kemp’s statement that Pfizer’s jab is “approved” is misinformation itself. No shot on the market is approved with all those in use under emergency use authorization.
This is an anonymously posted document by someone who calls themselves Spartacus. Because it’s anonymous, I can’t contact them to ask for permission to publish. So I hesitated for a while, but it’s simply the best document I’ve seen on Covid, vaccines, etc. Whoever Spartacus is, they have a very elaborate knowledge in “the field”. If you want to know a lot more about the no. 1 issue in the world today, read it. And don’t worry if you don’t understand every single word, neither do I. But I learned a lot.
Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology employed by the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines: Inoculating 28 million children 5 to 11 years old could lead to “1,000 or more excess deaths” while the risk from COVID-19 for healthy children is “about zero” and appears to be lower than the seasonal flu.
Paul Alexander, a clinical epidemiologist and former senior adviser on pandemic policy in U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: “We’ve been fed a lot of misleading information … children don’t get severely ill … children don’t die from this infection.”
Dr. Richard Urso, Texas ophthalmologist: In Sweden, where schools were kept open, there was “not a single death of a child from COVID.”
Nov 2, 2021. COVID-19 Vaccination for Children 5 through 11 Years Old
CDC now recommends that children between the ages of 5 and 11 years receive the Pfizer-BioNTech pediatric COVID-19 Vaccine. Get more information and read CDC’s media statement.
Smaller (less thant 100 employees) Companies. OSHA said Thursday that the mandate could be expanded to companies with fewer than 100 workers. The agency said it will make a decision after collecting public comment on that proposal for the next 30 days.
Kulldorf, noting both studies cannot be right, said he has never “never before seen such a large discrepancy between studies that are supposed to answer the same question.”
Kulldorff is an epidemiologist, biostatistician and professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. He is the co-author, along with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and Dr. Sunetra Gupta of Oxford, of the Great Barrington Declaration, advocating a public policy of “focused protection” on the vulnerable while letting others go about their business. More than 860,000 people have signed the declaration, including 14,981 medical and public health scientists, and 44,167 medical practitioners.
“The evidence is in. Governors, journalists, scientists, university presidents, hospital administrators and business leaders can continue to follow Dr. Anthony Fauci or open their eyes. After 700,000-plus COVID deaths and the devastating effects of lockdowns, it is time to return to basic principles of public health.”
Right now, the medical establishment is doing the equivalent of a doctor who, when he concludes that you are in the early stages of a sinus infection, sends you home without any antibiotics and, instead, tells you to return when you’re septic. When it comes to COVID, we’re all told to go home and get back to the doctor when we’re on the verge of dying and interventional medicines will no longer work. Meanwhile, almost the entire American establishment (Democrats, doctors, Hollywood stars) hectors everyone to get vaccinated.
Delta Variant – early treatment (with available and safe drugs) the key for the vaxxed and unvaxxed.
Vaccination can’t be the only strategy
We have existing treatments independent of the variant
Too much fear and propaganda – IQ drop of 20 points for kids born after Jan 2020.
Of the approximate 32- kids that dies of Covid, all had comorbidities. This could be changing. Again, early treatment (with available drugs) can prevent deaths.
Prevention: Ivermectin is effective if taken regularly as is HDC or both – no deaths
Dr. Tyson – 6,000 patients – no deaths if treated day 1-7, (?) deaths if treated day 7-14.
Barriers – Financial interests – vaccines are profitable; Academia – last 10 yrs, “only proof of efficacy of a drug has to come from a large, double blind randomized control trial. Takes time, delayed, under-dosed.
Dr. Malone – safety of the mRNA has enormous promise. Safety of the underlug technology is not demonstrated yet. In the fog of war, rushed to market.
Spike Protein from the vaccine has caused more damage than any medical treatment in history. Most people will be fine.
Dr. Malone. Takes a decade or more to produce a vaccine that is safe and effective and to demonstrate it is safe. . FDA 2 years after phase 3 trials of 3,000 people (the more the better) and another two years to see if there are any autoimmune issues.
Short-cuts? Normally it takes three years to evaluate the data vs 6-8 months after phase 3 trails were completed. Didn’t have the data to identify and assess adverse effects. No testing on effect on pregnant women. Spike Protein causes inflammation in the ovaries – do not know effect or if is safe.
“The mandates are pointless. Now that we know that fully vaccinated individuals are getting infected, they can transmit the disease. Unfortunately, they are being hospitalized, they’re getting seriously ill, they’re dying. There’s no point to the mandate, whatsoever.“
On the dangers of the vaccines, Senator Johnson added, “They’re completely ignoring the vaccine injuries. And Maria, people really need to understand this because it’s not being reported. It’s being suppressed. But over 25 years with the flu vaccine there were a little less than 1,700 deaths reported on the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS). That’s CDC’s early surveillance security system… With the COVID Vaccine, we’ve had 16,766 deaths in 10 months administering this vaccine.”
Dr. Peter McCullough has been a leader in working to help people build their immune system and to provide treatments that will prevent the need for people to be hospitalized. He is among the many of physicians that support building natural immunity and has expressed concerns with the vaccines. INTERVIEW WITH DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH –
Warning that the world is “in the middle of a major biological catastrophe,” renowned physician and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough charged in a recent address that fraudulent public health officials are pushing experimental “gene-transfer” COVID-19 vaccines that produce the “loaded weapon” of a toxic spike protein.
Dr. Dan Stock wants to warn people about the Covid-19 vaccines. Nine months to a year after getting them, many people are going to get sick and many will die, he says. The word he used to describe what is likely to happen is “holocaust.” Could he be right? Stock lists three reasons.
In a Highwire exclusive, Deborah Conrad, a hospitalist physician’s assistant on the frontlines of the pandemic, pulls back the curtain on the complete lack and disregard in her hospital for reporting Covid vaccine injury to VAERS, this country’s only mechanism to track the safety of these rushed-to-market, mandated products. In riveting detail, including emails & recorded phone conversations, Conrad exposes the internal push to turn a blind eye to injuries and “tow the company line” that this vaccine is safe.
Ventavia Research Group operated several of the trial sites in the fall of 2020. Brook Jackson worked for the company during this time. She told the British Medical Journal (BMJ) that the trial was riddled with issues, including the falsification of data.
Jackson said she alerted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to the problems she witnessed and was fired within hours of doing so.
As testimonies of people being denied proper healthcare for COVID infection in America’s hospitals mount, attorneys are hitting back at the medical staff responsible for overseeing “death sentence” COVID treatment plans, promising justice to those responsible: “We’re going to hold you accountable.”
A “Physicians’ Declaration” produced by an international alliance of physicians and medical scientists strongly condemns the global strategy to treat COVID, accusing policy-makers of potential “crimes against humanity” for preventing physicians from providing life-saving treatments for their patients and suppressing open scientific discussion. … The document states that “one size fits all” treatment recommendations have resulted in needless illness and death.
Martin Kulldorf, professor of medicine at Harvard University, says we must acknowledge that 400 years of scientific enlightenment may be coming to end because there is no longer open and honest discourse, which is critical for science and public health.
Kulldorff calls his critics’ hand by demanding they engage in a scientific discussion about their position, rather than name-calling and threatening professional repercussions.
“If we are to be faulted for anything, it is that we failed to convince governments to implement focused protection instead of damaging lockdowns,” Kulldorff writes. “One place where we had some success was Florida, where the cumulative age-adjusted Covid mortality is lower than the US national average with less collateral damage. If we are wrong, then as scientists we would welcome a scientific discussion on how and where we are wrong.”
2. Apologize for the biggest public health fiasco in history
3. Rebuild public trust
The fact that the world is now 19 months into COVID demands that continue to defy science, ethics, and human and natural rights, with still no substantive response to the evidence- and reason-based critics of all these drastic impositions, suggests oppression is all the COVID authoritarians have. If they had science, reason, and humanity on their side, they would demonstrate it instead of twisting everyone’s arms.
Since they’re sticking with coercion and pressure tactics instead of informed and open debate, it’s safe to presume at this point that arm-twisting is all they have. And that they’re not going to stop until people make them.
Directory
Directory of Doctors serving IN – plus America Frontline Doctors and My Free Doctor
Modified Patterson early treatment protocol for COVID. Based on recommendation of Dr. Bruce Patterson with a few minor improvements. Patterson who treats thousands of long-haul COVID and vaccine cases so he knowns more than anyone else the drugs that in combination are the most effective in countering the inflammation caused by COVID. Take all drugs (that you can access) IMMEDIATELY after you suspect a COVID infection (except as indicated). They are all safe and do not interact with each other.
Viganò asserts that vaccines normally go through years of rigorous testing, and that the lack of such a process in the case of COVID-19 jabs represents public health authorities conducting “experimentation on the entire world population.”
The Archbishop referenced drug treatments that have proven effective in fighting COVID without the risks of vaccines, noting that such drugs have been discredited by global health bodies and the media.
“It must be reiterated that there are effective treatments which cure patients and allow them to develop permanent natural immune defenses, something that the vaccines do not do,” he wrote. “Furthermore, these treatments do not cause serious side effects, since the drugs that are used have been licensed for decades.”
“International standards specify that an experimental drug cannot be authorized for distribution except in the absence of an effective alternative treatment: this is why drug agencies in the USA and Europe have prevented the use of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, hyper-immune plasma, and other therapies with proven effectiveness,” he added.
Viganò goes on to state that the vaccines proving ineffective in preventing people from getting and passing on the virus means they can’t even be called vaccines.
The Archbishop expressed his fury at other members of the clergy and Pope Francis himself for facilitating a “crime against humanity” and “satanic action against God.”
Finally, according to our Founding Fathers, “rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.” This country isn’t run by tyrants – yet – but the current vaccination campaign bears unmistakable totalitarian undertones. “Get the vaccine or lose your job.” That’s the message of the government. You can be a healthy 30-year-old who already had COVID, but the government doesn’t care. It wants everyone vaccinated – facts be damned.
“We should not force COVID vaccines on anyone when the evidence shows that naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to existing vaccines. Instead, we should respect the right of the bodily integrity of individuals to decide for themselves,”
Natural Acquired COVID Immunity Passport. Our mission is to help all people to determine if they are immune to COVID-19 virus through their own immune system. This requires a blood test to see if you achieved natural virus immunity, without the “vaccine” shot. If you have natural immunity, you do not need the COVID shot. …. Whether you know or are unsure if you have had the virus and want to know if you have achieved the natural immunity this is for you.
Approximately twenty studies have now emerged regarding natural immunity to COVID. All of them point to the fact that natural immunity acquired through a COVID infection can be quite robust.
The answer is clear. Natural immunity provides greater than 99% protection against Covid-19 while vaccine immunity is well below this level of protection even directly after vaccination and from there rapidly wanes.
“In the entire history of mankind there has never been a political elite sincerely concerned about the wellbeing of regular people. What makes any of us think that it is different now.”
AGs in Missouri, Nebraska, Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming sued President Joe Biden and multiple federal agencies and officials over federal guidance and an executive order mandating Covid-19 vaccinations for all workers for employers that have covered contracts with the federal government.
“I believe the COVID vaccine is a greater threat to soldiers’ health and military readiness than the virus itself,” U.S. Army aerospace physician Lt. Col. Theresa Long said Tuesday.
Long, who is senior flight surgeon at the U.S. Army Flight School at Fort Rucker, Alabama, was addressing a roundtable discussion put together by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin). She said she was speaking under federal military whistleblower protection.
DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not wish to have any appearance of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination, and also does not wish to disincentivize employers’ vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904’s recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination at least through May 2022. We will reevaluate the agency’s position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward.
1. Lack of a Public and Transparent Adverse Events Reporting System
2. Severe Impairments in Healthcare Professionals’ Adverse Events Reporting System
3. Data Distortion (including the deletion of thousands of citizen responses to a post by the Israeli Ministry of Health)
4. Legal and Ethical Violations in Data Collection Processes
The group told the FDA its conclusion is “reinforced by the significant doubts about the reliability of the data reported by Israel, as detailed above, and the consequent major concern that their use might be misleading and thus disrupt the decision-making processes pertaining to the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccines.”
I am not an anti-vaxxer, and plenty of my friends and colleagues have been vaccinated. … But these vindictive and punitive measures are outrageous and completely unjustifiable. In the end, they will do more harm than good, hurting lives more than saving lives while increasing our general mistrust of authority.
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, said in an interview with EpochTV that the risks outweigh any benefit.
I am not so insensitive to the voices of my colleagues in Infectious Disease and Pediatrics that I cannot hear them objecting. Loudly. One objection might be, “Why would you give ammunition for vaccine-hesitant parents and kids to avoid a societally-useful, individually-protective vaccine, all over a rare,1/6,600 reaction?” My inner Libertarian has a ready answer for that: I cannot endorse any policy that requires a substantial segment of the population to undergo a medical intervention in which the risk of harm might possibly exceed the benefit. In fact, I feel obliged to fight it.
It is Pfizer’s corporate duty to seek the broadest possible implementation of its vaccine, but even its most prominent board member is warning us: it’s too soon to mandate these vaccines to children. Our public health experts need to listen.
“Emergency use authorization of biological agents requires the existence of an emergency, and the non-existence of alternate treatments,” Dr. Rose said. “There is no emergency and Covid-19 is exceedingly treatable.”
Steve Kirsch: Jessica Rose, PhD just had her paper on VAERS analysis of myocarditis rejected after two rounds of review at “Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.” NO REASON GIVEN. This is scientific misconduct at its finest by the peer reviewers (not the Journal). Jessica is first-rate.
The state attorney general in Nebraska has issued an opinion that physicians can prescribe hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin as treatments for COVID-19 without violating any of the state’s laws or regulations.” The request from the health department came because of the flood of conflicting and inaccurate information about the treatments.
Early treatment protocols such as those used by Fareed and Tyson have been shown to provide more than a 99% relative risk reduction, work for all variants, and the drugs don’t maim or harm the recipients.
Dr. Fareed: The earlier the treatment can be started after the start of the infection, the better and more rapid the recovery (as well as the reduction in the risk of spread/contagious period). This would mean that the patient should optimally start the treatment in the first 4 days of the infection and within five days of exposure. It usually is based on symptoms which start within 1-4 days of viral entry into the upper respiratory system. Even starting the multi-faceted treatment later (7-10 days after infection) is also very worthwhile if severe pneumonia necessitating hospitalization has not yet set in.
But it was the eight doctors—who represent many more—who were the focus of the event. It would be almost inappropriate to describe them as other than a cast of superheroes. I’ll mix the metaphors or universes or whatever as I try to explain just a piece of what just went down.
Website: Vladimirzelenkomd.com. In March 2020,Dr. Zelenko’s team was one of the first in the country to successfully treat thousands of Covid-19 patients in the prehospital setting. Dr. Zelenko developed his now famous “Zelenko Protocol,” which has saved countless lives worldwideIn March 2020, Dr. Zelenko’s team was one of the first in the country to successfully treat thousands of Covid-19 patients in the prehospital setting. Dr. Zelenko developed his now famous “Zelenko Protocol,” which has saved countless lives worldwide
– Zelenko Protocol innovator: 99% survival of high risk Covid-19 patients
– Nominated for the Presidential Medal of Freedom
– Recognized as a hero at U.S. Senate Homeland Security committee hearing
– Published in top peer reviewed journals with world renowned physicians
– Provided counsel to White House personnel, multiple governments, hospitals, physicians, public figures
– Board Certified Family Physician with over 20 years experience
Dr. Zelenko also announced the release of his treatment for kids, which is available for preorder NOW! Get Dr. Zelenko’s AMAZING Treatment: www.zStackProtocol.com
Any doctor who actually reads the studies, or follows any of the protocols published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, will see a lot of peer pressure to stop. The financial risks may be extreme. It takes a spine of steel to stand up to the authoritarian orthodoxy.
Dr. Jessica Rose: Assessment of the data reported in VAERS. She holds degrees in applied mathematics, immunology, computational biology, molecular biology and biochemistry. You can find her bio at this link. The presentation references the work of Steve Kirsch that contributed to FDAs decision to delay approval for vaccination of children (1). She also supports the early treatment protocols developed by Dr. Peter McCullough.
Presentation Conclusions:
Use Early Treatments
Stop injection roll-out until safety and efficacy can properly be assessed.
Development of treatment options for the injection-injured.
Presentation Recommendation. Early treatment with known efficacious and safe drugs.
The Great Barrington Declaration. Over 55,000 infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists recommended an approach referred to as Focused Protection. Over 800,00 concerned citizens have also signed. “The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. “
… new scientific study out of Israel last week, the largest of its kind, compared natural immunity in individuals who were previously infected with Covid-19 against immunity in individuals who had received both doses of the Pfizer vaccine.
Those who had been vaccinated were 13 times more likely to be infected with the Delta variant (what has been called a “breakthrough” infection) than those with natural immunity, the study found
The study authors conclude: “This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer-lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant.”
And now the (Israeli) study says maybe even more protected than the vaccine alone. Should they also get the vaccine? How do you make the case to them?” Gupta asked. … “You know, that’s a really good point, Sanjay. I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that,” Fauci replied.
Military Servicemembers file a Class Action Lawsuit on behalf of the 220,000 membersthat have natural immunity. They are challenging the forced mandate for all. The lawsuit identifies the process that was used for approval of the vaccines and its deviation from the norm. Army Regulation 40-562 (“AR 40-562) “provides documented survivors of an infection a presumptive exemption from vaccination due to the natural immunity acquired as a result of having survived the infection. “ Lawsuit
The forced vaccination of all military personnel with the present COVID-19 vaccines may compromise U.S. national security due to the unknown extent of serious vaccine complications,” Furman wrote in his letter. “Further study is needed before committing the Total Force to one irreversible experimental group. Initial reports leave more concern for the COVID-19 vaccinations than the virus itself for the (at present) exceptionally healthy military population.”
In academia – Todd Zywicki of George Mason University School of Law sued over the mandate – he proved that he had natural immunity – and won an individual concession from the school but the policy remained unchanged. He is just one person but there are thousands of others, most of whom are quiet about their plight. They don’t have lawyers. They are considering just giving in. They wonder what the point of resistance really is. (The Purges have begun, Burning Platform)
Of the approximately 2,500 active duty Navy SEALs, each of whom cost Americans at least $500,000 to train, several hundred have sought an exemption from the Covid-19 vaccine mandate in the military—as many as a quarter of all active duty SEALs, according to R. Davis Younts, a JAG lawyer who is representing several of the special operators in his private capacity. JustTheNews reported that the SEALs—most of whom are shooters, not in senior leadership—have been told that, if they seek a religious accommodation, they will no longer be able to serve as active duty soldiers. In other words, their requests will almost certainly be denied.
The lawsuit alleges that the federal government’s mandate specifies only FDA-approved vaccines. It adds that the FDA’s approval specifies only Pfizer’s “Comirnaty” vaccine, and not the unnamed Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that has been available for nearly a year and remains under emergency use authorization.
The FDA has maintained that the existing Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is identical to the Comirnaty vaccine and considered interchangeable, and that the only difference is the legal name and the packaging.
Service members from all five branches of the military, federal employees, and federal civilian contractors have joined in a class action lawsuit against the Department of Defense over its COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
The 24 plaintiffs “face a deadline under the Federal COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate to receive a COVID-19 vaccine that violates their sincerely held religious beliefs, and have been refused any religious exemption or accommodation,” according to Liberty Counsel, the Christian legal firm that filed the lawsuit.
The lawsuit (pdf), filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, lists President Joe Biden, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas as defendants.
The Guardian, a UK newspaper, has published a wonderfully informed, detailed list of key facts you should understand about COVID. I am going to give you the reader’s digest version, but here is the link to read the whole thing. Please do.
Sept 18, 2021. Brown County contracts with IU for ambulance service. “125 Staff Part Ways With Indiana’s Biggest Hospital System After Refusing Vaccine By Tom Ozimek
On Friday an FDA advisory panel declined to endorse authorization the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid booster shot for people aged 16 or older.
The panel voted 16-2 to reject extra doses of an experimental vaccine, citing insufficient data from incomplete clinical trials and the potential risk of heart inflammation – especially among young men.
The FDA hearing prior to the decision was stunning. The hearing was 8 hours long and it included SHOCKING testimony from American doctors.
Dr. Joseph Fraiman, MD told the FDA on Friday that government does not have data to show the vaccine was more beneficial than it is harmful for teenage boys.
Steve Kirsch, the Executive Director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund was up next to testify before the FDA. Kirsch argued the vaccines kill more people than they save. … Kirsh pointed out that there patients were 71 times more likely to suffer a heart attack after taking the vaccine than those taking other vaccines. 20 died from the drug, 14 from the placebo. … Kirsh argued that the vaccine killed more people than saved lives.
Steve Kirsch also pointed out that early treatments are more successful than boosters, noting that cases in Israel are at an all-time high and cases in Uttar Pradesh, India where they administer Ivermectin, the cases are nearly non-existent today.
Some arguments are faulty, not necessarily because of the truth or falsity of the premises, but because they rely on psychological and emotional ploys. These are bad arguments because people shouldn’t accept your conclusion if you are using scare tactics or distracting and manipulating reasoning. Arguments that have this issue are called fallacies. There are a lot of fallacies, so, again, if you want to know more a web search will be useful. We are going to look at several that seem to be the most relevant for our day-to-day experiences.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority: We are definitely going to use authority figures in our lives (e.g. doctors, lawyers, mechanics, financial advisors, etc.), but we need to make sure that the authority figure is a reliable one.
Things to look for here might include: reputation in the field, not holding widely controversial views, experience, education, and the like. So, if we take an authority figure’s word and they’re not legit, we’ve committed the fallacy of appeal to authority.
Example 5: I think I am going to take my investments to Voya. After all, Steven Adams advocates for Voya in an advertisement I recently saw.
If we look at the criteria for evaluating arguments that appeal to authority figures, it is pretty easy to see that Adams is not an expert in the finance field. Thus, this is an inappropropriate appeal to authority.
Slippery Slope Arguments: Slippery slope arguments are found everywhere it seems. The essential characteristic of a slippery slope argument is that it uses problematic premises to argue that doing ‘x’ will ultimately lead to other actions that are extreme, unlikely, and disastrous. You can think of this type of argument as a faulty chain of events or domino effect type of argument.
Example 6: If you don’t study for your philosophy exam you will not do well on the exam. This will lead to you failing the class. The next thing you know you will have lost your scholarship, dropped out of school, and will be living on the streets without any chance of getting a job.
While you should certainly study for your philosophy exam, if you don’t it is unlikely that this will lead to your full economic demise.
One challenge to evaluating slippery slope arguments is that they are predictions, so we cannot be certain about what will or will not actually happen. But this chain of events type of argument should be assessed in terms of whether the outcome will likely follow if action ‘x” is pursued.
Faulty Analogy: We often make arguments based on analogy and these can be good arguments. But we often use faulty reasoning with analogies and this is what we want to learn how to avoid.
When evaluating an argument that is based on an analogy here are a few things to keep in mind: you want to look at the relevant similarities and the relevant differences between the things that are being compared. As a general rule, if there are more differences than similarities the argument is likely weak.
Example 7: Alcohol is legal. Therefore, we should legalize marijuana too.
So, the first step here is to identify the two things being compared, which are alcohol and marijuana. Next, note relevant similarities and differences. These might include effects on health, community safety, economic factors, criminal justice factors, and the like.
This is probably not the best argument in support for marijuana legalization. It would seem that one could just as easily conclude that since marijuana is illegal, alcohol should be too. In fact, one might find that alcohol is an often abused and highly problematic drug for many people, so it is too risky to legalize marijuana if it is similar to alcohol.
Appeal to Emotion: Arguments should be based on reason and evidence, not emotional tactics. When we use an emotional tactic, we are essentially trying to manipulate someone into accepting our position by evoking pity or fear, when our positions should actually be backed by reasonable and justifiable evidence.
Example 8: Officer please don’t give me a speeding ticket. My girlfriend broke up with me last night, my alarm didn’t go off this morning, and I’m late for class.
While this is a really horrible start to one’s day, being broken up with and an alarm malfunctioning is not a justifiable reason for speeding.
Example 9: Professor, I’d like you to remember that my mother is a dean here at TCC. I’m sure that she will be very disappointed if I don’t receive an A in your class.
This is a scare tactic and is not a good way to make an argument. Scare tactics can come in the form of psychological or physical threats; both forms are to be avoided.
Appeal to Ignorance: This fallacy occurs when our argument relies on lack of evidence when evidence is actually needed to support a position.
Example 10: No one has proven that sasquatch doesn’t exist; therefore it does exist.
Example 11: No one has proven God exists; therefore God doesn’t exist.
The key here is that lack of evidence against something cannot be an argument for something. Lack of evidence can only show that we are ignorant of the facts.
Straw Man: A straw man argument is a specific type of argument that is intended to weaken an opponent’s position so that it is easier to refute. So, we create a weaker version of the original argument (i.e. a straw man argument), so when we present it everyone will agree with us and denounce the original position.
Example 12: Women are crazy arguing for equal treatment. No one wants women hanging around men’s locker rooms or saunas.
This is a misrepresentation of arguments for equal treatment. Women (and others arguing for equal treatment) are not trying to obtain equal access to men’s locker rooms or saunas.
The best way to avoid this fallacy is to make sure that you are not oversimplifying or misrepresenting others’ positions. Even if we don’t agree with a position, we want to make the strongest case against it and this can only be accomplished if we can refute the actual argument, not a weakened version of it. So, let’s all bring the strongest arguments we have to the table!
Red Herring: A red herring is a distraction or a change in subject matter. Sometimes this is subtle, but if you find yourself feeling lost in the argument, take a close look and make sure there is not an attempt to distract you.
Example 13: Can you believe that so many people are concerned with global warming? The real threat to our country is terrorism.
It could be the case that both global warming and terrorism are concerns for us. But the red herring fallacy is committed when someone tries to distract you from the argument at hand by bringing up another issue or side-stepping a question. Politicians are masters at this, by the way.
Appeal to the Person: This fallacy is also referred to as the ad hominem fallacy. We commit this fallacy when we dismiss someone’s argument or position by attacking them instead of refuting the premises or support for their argument.
Example 14: I am not going to listen to what Professor ‘X’ has to say about the history of religion. He told one of his previous classes he wasn’t religious.
The problem here is that the student is dismissing course material based on the professor’s religious views and not evaluating the course content on its own ground.
To avoid this fallacy, make sure that you target the argument or their claims and not the person making the argument in your rebuttal.
Hasty Generalization: We make and use generalizations on a regular basis and in all types of decisions. We rely on generalizations when trying to decide which schools to apply to, which phone is the best for us, which neighborhood we want to live in, what type of job we want, and so on. Generalizations can be strong and reliable, but they can also be fallacious. There are three main ways in which a generalization can commit a fallacy: your sample size is too small, your sample size is not representative of the group you are making a generalization about, or your data could be outdated.
Example 15: I had horrible customer service at the last Starbucks I was at. It is clear that Starbucks employees do not care about their customers. I will never visit another Starbucks again.
The problem with this generalization is that the claim made about all Starbucks is based on one experience. While it is tempting to not spend your money where people are rude to their customers, this is only one employee and presumably doesn’t reflect all employees or the company as a whole. So, to make this a stronger generalization we would want to have a larger sample size (multiple horrible experiences) to support the claim. Let’s look at a second hasty generalization:
Example 16: I had horrible customer service at the Starbucks on 81st street. It is clear that Starbucks employees do not care about their customers. I will never visit another Starbucks again.
The problem with this generalization mirrors the previous problem in that the claim is based on only one experience. But there’s an additional issue here as well, which is that the claim is based off of an experience at one location. To make a claim about the whole company, our sample group needs to be larger than one and it needs to come from a variety of locations.
Begging the Question: An argument begs the question when the argument’s premises assume the conclusion, instead of providing support for the conclusion. One common form of begging the question is referred to as circular reasoning.
Example 17: Of course, everyone wants to see the new Marvel movie is because it is the most popular movie right now!
The conclusion here is that everyone wants to see the new Marvel movie, but the premise simply assumes that is the case by claiming it is the most popular movie. Remember the premise should give reasons for the conclusion, not merely assume it to be true.
Equivocation: In the English language there are many words that have different meanings (e.g. bank, good, right, steal, etc.). When we use the same word but shift the meaning without explaining this move to your audience, we equivocate the word and this is a fallacy. So, if you must use the same word more than once and with more than one meaning you need to explain that you’re shifting the meaning you intend. Although, most of the time it is just easier to use a different word.
Example 18: Yes, philosophy helps people argue better, but should we really encourage people to argue? There is enough hostility in the world.
Here, argue is used in two different senses. The meaning of the first refers to the philosophical meaning of argument (i.e. premises and a conclusion), whereas the second sense is in line with the common use of argument (i.e. yelling between two or more people, etc.).
Independent Voters of Brown County IN 