BC Democrat – Local Govt Notes – Watchdog Role? – For the Record

The BC Democrat is owned by AIM Media Indiana. Per Wikipedia, AIM Media Management is a media company based in Dallas, Texas. Through its subsidiaries AIM Media IndianaAIM Media Midwest (also known as Digital AIM Media), and AIM Media Texas, it publishes dozens of daily and weekly newspapers in Indiana, Ohio, and Texas, respectively. The company was founded by Jeremy Halbreich in 2012 to acquire Freedom Communications holdings and later acquired additional newspapers.[1]

democrat local govt notes

Aug 9, 2023.  A “NEW” addition (watchdog of government) to the local paper – Brown County Democrat. “In the coming weeks and months, we also plan on sharing some of the exact requirements and obligations the state imposes on local governmental groups for transparency.”   This post at Brown County Matters.

    • The County invested over 6 figures in a new website to make it easier for offices and departments to keep citizens informed on their contributions. Commissioners (meet two times a month) have not been posting meeting agendas, minutes, or audio. The council meets monthly – they do not post minutes or audio. Will be interested to see if or how soon this fact changes.
    • As of Aug 8, 2023 – Snapshot Website Agenda Center. 20230810 Agenda Center – Brown County IN – CivicEngage
    • Note:  After the resignation of the last editor of the BC Democrat, no reporters from the paper have been attending commissioners and council meetings
    • On the Aim Media/BC Democrat “watchdog” role, this is interesting. In what other papers are they doing this?   And, they stopped publishing the calendar of government meetings on June 28.  They do not even send a reporter to cover commissioner and council meetings. Former Editor Sara Clifford always reinforced the open meeting laws – this emphasis went away with her. ]

Commissioner Meeting Notes, Aug 4, 2023, 2 – 3:30

Commissioner meeting notes, Aug 4, 2023, 2 – 3:30.  A full agenda, productive meeting.  Let’s hope this trend continues.   20230804 Agenda Commissioner Meeting

Audio of the meeting and …. This post at Brown County Matters

Meeting Minutes. Sandy Cain, reinforced that minutes just need to cover the key points that include decisions that were made and the votes.  Note that commissioners have the responsibility to review and vote to approve.

On decisions requiring a vote, Ron Sanders is often the only dissenting vote.  Too often, commissioners are asked to vote on a decision with incomplete information and/or not provided with enough time to review.

For those considering running for commissioners in 2024, a review of the minutes is one of the ways of learning what the commissioner’s job entails. Attending meetings provides additional insights.

Overloook on 135, Re-building the Shelter. The Parks and Rec board agreed to take the lead in building a new Shelter at the site. It is hoped that grants, and donations, including material and time will help keep the cost low. The County will continue to mow grass and provide insurance. Transferring the property from the county to Park and Rec was not needed.

Bean Blossom Overlook and Shelter House

Indian Hill Railroad Crossing. The commissioners closed the crossing in May 2020 without a public hearing. Consequently, the impact and risks on residents and eliminating access to the Tecumseh Trail were not considered in the decision-making process. This led to an ongoing initiative – locally, regionally, statewide, to re-open the crossing. This year, commissioners petitioned INDOT to re-open the crossing. The Indiana Railroad Company (INRD) filed a rebuttal. The county and Knowbstone Hiking Trail Association (KHTA) provided a response to the INRDs rebuttal. INDOT to make a decision by Sep 23, 2023. Background on the issue and documentation available at the following: Part 4: Closure RR Xing, Indian Hill Rd – Petition to Re-Open

Capital Improvement Plan and Budget. Commissioner Sanders has taken the lead in developing a plan. The lack of a plan has been a repeat finding by the State Board of Accounts that has been ignored by the county.  A priority is the replacement of the air conditioning units at the jail at a cost likely to exceed 640K. Given the age of the systems, replacing one or more now instead of all at a later time, may pose incompatibility issues depending on the equipment/vendor selected.

 Other.  NEW Ordinance on position descriptions, a new service contract for Melissa Stinsor to provide assistance to the commissioners, the critical importance on the accuracy of position descriptions and classifications and the relationship to pay and benefits are provided in the notes on the Aug 3 Govt Meeting 3 at the following: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1749284288485538/posts/6541134535967132/

Commissioner Meeting Notes – July 19, 2023,  6-8 pm.“Interesting” meeting and contentious at times.

Commissioner Meeting Notes – July 19, 2023,  6-8 pm.“Interesting” meeting and very contentious at times.    The AUDIO 

Note: Commissioner Sanders was elected by the voters over the local GOP’s preferred candidate. The animosity and lack of support by the GOP faithful have been quite evident at meetings.  This continued lack of respect may help prompt voters from both parties, to take a harder look at precinct elections in order to have more of a direct impact on the quality of representation. Brown County Republican Party (GOP) – Organization and Governance

Summary of the key issue – New full-time commissioner assistant.  This topic was “introduced”  at the July 5, 2023  commissioner meeting. Commissioner Pittman did not disclose that it was decided that a new full-time position was needed and a consultant was used to provide advice regarding the job description. Wolpert stated he knew nothing about it.  It was also not disclosed that the request for approval and funding for the position would be made at the county council’s  July 17 meeting by Commissioners Pittman and Wolpert. Commissioner Sanders was not included in the decision-making process.  When 2 of the 3 commissioners make a decision in the absence of a public meeting, it may represent a violation of open meeting laws and result in vacating the decision.

 Commissioners Assistant Position.  Commissioner Pittman (elected) and  Commissioner Wolpert (appointed) at Monday’s council meeting, pleaded with the council to immediately approve and fund a full-time commissioner assistant position at a grade 14 (42K).  Commissioner Pittman said he/they had been working on the job description for a month and had had contractor support. The argument from the commissioners appeared desperate indicating a vital need.  Link to the July 17 council meeting notes and audio

    • Note the council’s policy regarding a new air upgraded position is for the need to be identified before the end of June at a council meeting.

They would not take no for an answer nor compromise on the grade.  They believed they would be lucky to find anyone that would do the work at that pay grade although several employees have expressed interest in applying.  The discussion lasted for about 90 minutes and the council voted 4 to 3 to approve. The legality of the vote by Councilman Rudd who attended via Zoom, was questioned at last night’s meeting by Sanders, and the county attorney was asked to provide an opinion.

The Commissioners never had a vote on adding the position and I expected this to occur during last night’s meeting. Given the Pittman/Wolpert argument made at the council meeting, I asked Sanders if a vote was going to be added to the agenda and I told him I would accept the position on a volunteer basis at no pay.  After the discussion at the council meeting, I was curious to learn more about why the position was suddenly needed,  the operations of the commissioner’s office, the workload, and the distribution of the workload among the commissioners. I was also curious to learn more about the culture and working conditions within the building.  At a special meeting of county employees and elected officials on July 19, many significant issues were discussed which makes me interested in learning more about county operations and supporting improvements.  I will be posting my notes on this meeting today or tomorrow.

Note that a volunteer basis provides more flexibility for both parties as opposed to a paid position.  In fact, posting the need and opportunity may lead to even more volunteers that are interested in learning more about and improving the quality of government services.

Sanders questioned the decision “not to have” a vote and mentioned that someone might offer to do it at no pay on a volunteer basis.  Wolpert immediately replied that this would not happen.  I then re-stated my offer to the commissioners to accept the position at no pay on a volunteer basis and asked the county attorney what might be needed.  Pittman stated the commissioners did not have to vote on adding the position, and Wolpert said it was a done deal and “gone over a million times.”

As a precedent, Pittman referenced the work by the council on the restructuring and approval of the HR director position and the part-time commissioner assistant position with no vote by  the commissioners at a public meeting.  The fact that the commissioners now want a change indicates the problem with a lack of transparency and public input.  The agreement also included a supervisory role of a council rep and auditor over a position that is a commissioner’s responsibility that cannot be delegated.  What is the harm of the commissioners discussing this type of action (new position) at their meeting and going on record with their acceptance via a vote?

The new position is posted on the county website. A county employee questioned the detail in the job description and was dismissed. https://www.browncounty-in.gov/Jobs.aspx

I requested that the county attorney provide a written opinion on this issue, e.g.,  that  No vote was required. It may not be legally required but what would be the harm of defending the argument at the commissioner’s meeting?  Especially, when Pittman/Wolpert did not mention at their July 5 meeting that they made the decision (not in a public meeting)  and intended to request the council to approve. This may be in violation of open meeting laws – they decided on a course of action outside of a public meeting.  The audio discussion starts at the 1:14 mark

The meeting was “contentious ” at times.  Allegations have also been made that the new position has been pre-selected which may lead to a formal complaint and investigation depending on the person selected for the position.  The “fast-track” process for this position by the commissioners without the opportunity for public discussion, can undermine the legitimacy of the position and the person selected.

Part 2 – Other items.

Indian Hill RR Crossing – Re-Opening.  Scott Rudd provided an update and the county attorney is working on submitting the rebuttal to the Indiana Railroad Company by the end of the month.

Overlook and Shelter.  Commissioners approved transferring the overlook from the county to Parks and Rec with the caveat the Parks and Rec board would accept the transfer.

Salt Creek Trail. A committee has been formed – $2 million in grant money may be available and will require county matching funds.  This only will cover the construction of the trail from the Red Barn to the YMCA. DOES NOT INCLUDE land acquisition which falls under the State/DNR.  Salt Creek Trail and Bridges – For The Record

.

.

RDC Meeting Notes – July 18, 2023 – 6-8 p.m

rdc

RDC Meeting Notes – July 18, 2023 – 6-8 p.5:11 pm
Updated: July 19, 2023  This post at Brown County Matters

I was re-appointed to the Redevelopment Commission (RDC) by the commissioners this year.

My interest includes supporting the development of a County “Fact” Book.   If “development or redevelopment” is the solution, what is the problem?  How will we know that any change is supported by the community and what feedback is needed to assess that change resulted in improvement?  On economics, population, and demographics topics, Stats Indiana https://www.stats.indiana.edu/ is one of the better sources for some basic information.

The RDC consists of six members – 3 commissioner appointments (Sean Milloy, Sue Lindberg, Tim Clark),  2 council appointments (Kevin Patrick, Mike Spalding), and a School Board Appointment (Stephanie Kritzer,) The RDC president is Kevin Patrick.

    • The interest from the county council is in assessing the potential economic impacts of sewers in Bean Blossom – Lead on this is Kevin Patrick.
    • Unlike Helmsburg and Lake Lemon, there is no citizen-led community group (501.c3) in Bean Blossom.

Assessing economic impacts includes developing a capability for analyzing the property and assessment data. This would provide information to identify trends and projections in assessments and property tax by areas and types (residents, commercial, tourist), etc.

The Brown County GIS System is uploaded with data from the county but does not support analytics.  Transferring this data to a system that supports analysis would be an improvement and is being investigated.  The county GIS system also helps identify actual and projected infrastructure that supports development such as: electric, water, sewer, gas, and broadband.

I first served on the RDC in 2016 and 2017. I worked with Helmsburg on their Economic Development Plan and continue to support the sewer plant upgrades and expansion from Helmsburg to Lake Lemon.  This will be another edition of their success story: Helmsburg Revitalization – Community Led

Helmsburg provides a great example of a community identifying what they want and do not want in terms of development and infrastructure.  This is a much better approach for updating the Brown County Comprehensive Plan (PDF) that is vague, and not area specific.  The county plan does not respect the unique needs and desires of the different areas in the County.

In addition, to support for Helmsburg during my first appointment, I also supported the following initiatives:

Council Meeting Notes, July 17, 2023.

Council Meeting Notes, July 17, 2023. 6:30 pm to 8:00.

Audio of the Meeting.

Pay and Benefits. the County Council has recognized the need to re-examine the employee compensation system to include salaries, grades, positions, benefits, et.al. It has been incremented over time with a series of “patches” and has created conditions that are not being perceived as being fair and equitable.  And given the constraints on the county’s ability to raise taxes, makes for an interesting challenge.  What has been missing in past change efforts to include requests for higher grades and new positions, has been a workload analysis linked to statutes, combined with an assessment of performance.

New Position – Commissioner Assistant at 42K a year. Commissioners (Wolpert, Pittman) pleaded that their part-time assistant position be converted to full-time so they can post the new position immediately. The current part-time position will remain for the rest of the year and the new position is to be immediately advertised.  I do not recall that the commissioners had a vote on adding the full-time position – assume this will happen at this Wednesday’s meeting.

Vote to Approve. After about a 90-minute discussion, the council voted to approve – 4 Yes (Hewett, Rudd, Kemp, Kirby), 2 No’s (Byrd, Swift-Powdrill), and 1 abstain (Redding). No discussion or details were presented as to the workload (the need). What is the current workload of the commissioners and how is this distributed among the three commissioners?

Need? The need for a full-time position emerged during the last few weeks with the appointment of Blake Wolpert.  Commissioners (Wolpert, Pittman) voted to contract with a former employee that served in the full-time admin assistant role, to help with their budget. Last fall (post-election) commissioners and council decided to re-structure the position to part-time and then create a new full-time HR director.

On-the-Job Training. When new council and commissioners are elected, I do not recall any that could hit the ground running. Some candidates generally show up for a few meetings to get a feel for the position which is not exactly good preparation.  And state statutes, along with the lack of SOPs, do not make learning about county operations, finance and budgeting an easy endeavor.   At a minimum, prospective candidates should review about 2-3 years of minutes of meetings to identify their tasks and responsibilities.  A review of the statutes identifying the requirements of the elected office would also be of value.

Budget.  The Circuit Court needed another 6K to pay for psychiatric services that are needed to assess the defendant’s ability to stand trial. This expense varies – $4,600 last year and 1$1K in 2021. The Coroner needed another $18,500 for autopsy services.

Brown County Republican Party (GOP) – Organization, Governance, Precincts

Updated Oct 11, 2023   

Officers

2024 Republican Precinct Election – Committeemen 

    • Charlie Shaw, Hamblen 1
    • Mark Bowman Hamblen 2 (Chair)
    • Phil Stephens  Hamblen 3 (Hamblen Township Trustee, Director, Brown County Recycling.)
    • Deborah Goodrich, Jackson 1
    • Diana Biddle, Jackson 2,  (Replaced by Sandy Higgins).
    • Duane Parsons, Jackson 3,
    • Larry Gardner, Jackson 4,
    • Jim Kemp for Van Buren 1, (Councilman, Treasurer)
    • Ted Adams, Washington 1, (Prosecutor)
    • Theresa Cobian, for Washington 2 (Commissioner Assistant)
    • Washington 3 (vacant).

political structure

Disclosure: I register as a Republican in the primaries and do not always vote a straight party ticket. 

    • Comments from the Chair of Brown County Republican party on straight-ticket voting:  “Even as a party chairman, Bowman said he doesn’t like to see so many voters choosing the straight-party option. To him, that shows voters lack knowledge about the candidates. The choice listed from one’s own party isn’t always automatically the best choice for the job, he said.”  BCD GOP SWEEP Nov 14, 2018
    • Ref: 2018 County Election Results.

Vote County Interests in the 2024 Republican Primary – Cross-over Votes Needed

Precinct Chairs and Vice Chairs elect the local GOP Chair. This leadership group influences the selection of local candidates for offices and appointments. They also determine the direction of the county which includes a bias for development not supported by the community.

    • One of the strategies supporting development is the expansion of sewer service throughout the county. “Appointed” officials of the Brown County Regional Sewer District (BCRSD) Board contracted for the development of a “county-wide” wastewater strategic plan. This plan was funded with tax dollars at a cost of over $100K.  It was developed without any input from the public nor was it ever introduced at any public meetings. This plan led to a request for funding of over $50 million dollars. This overall strategy had/has the approval of the local GOP, commissioners, and council. Ref: BCRSD Sewer Expansion Project on “Trial” – For The Record 

Examples of non-partisan political platforms:  

Election Integrity

Brown County  GOP

County Boards and their Members – appointments by Commissioners and Council.  

Many (most) County offices – 2023 Brown County Connections Magazine – published by the Brown County Democrat

“Elephant” in the local GOP Room?  The core leadership in the party includes the Bowmans. The Bowmans are owners of a real estate company and have demonstrated a bias for development. I cannot recall being at any government meetings where they did not support any kind of development-related project.

    • The overall situation is reminiscent of the television series Yelllowstone starring Kevin Costner as John Dutton.  In the series, developers have identified how they can transition a beautiful landscape into a commercial mecca. They are being opposed by the Duttons who want to retain the beauty of the landscape and retain the rural culture. 
    • In Brown County, it is the residents who choose to live here or retire here that provide the major source of tax revenue.  Gentrification and a Gatlinburg-Lite may be the desired future of some but certainly not the majority.  For instance, tourism accounts for about 12 million in taxable wages. The total taxable wages in the county from all residents is over 424 million.  Brown County is considered a naturally occurring retirement community (NORC) and by Ball State economists as a “bedroom community” e.g., people choose to live here but generate their income outside the county.   
    • “What is that one thing?”  – Quality of Life

Officers – Pre-May Primary
Any other county positions in parentheses

    • Mark Bowman, Chair
    • Deborah Noe, Vice Chair
    • New: Melissa (Stinson) Waddell, Secretary  and County Commissioner Assistant
    • Julia Reeves, Treasurer (Auditor)
  •  Precinct chairs and Vice Chairs
    Any other county positions in parentheses
    • Hamblen 1: Cynthia Rose Wolpert  (Health Board) / Blake Wolpert (commissioner as of May 2023)
    • Hamblen 2: Mark Bowman (local GOP Chair)/ Tanner Bowman (former paid county intern)
    • Hamblen 3: Phil Stephens (Director, Recycling Center)  / Deborah Noe
    • Jackson 1: Deborah Goodrich / Darren Byrd (councilman)
    • Jackson 2: Diana McDonald Biddle (former commissioner) / Scott Rudd (councilman)
    • Jackson 3: Sandy Higgins (Jackson Township Trustee) / Jamie Voils
    • Jackson 4: Larry Gardner / Herb Ross
    • Washington 1: Dave Redding (councilman) / Keith Baker
    • Washington 2: Mike Magner (Highway Superintendant) / Brandon Magner (Washington Township Trustee)
    • Washington 3: Ted Adams (Prosecutor) / Robyn Rosenberg Bowman (PTABOA Board, Maple Leaf (Music Center) Building Corp board member)
    • Van Buren: Ben Phillips  (Brown County Water Board member) / Brad Stogsdill (Sheriff)

Monopoly on Power.  Brown County has a one-party monopoly on political power.  The surveyor is the only office held by a non-GOP candidate. Centralization of power is never a good thing and leads to moral corruption and an abuse of power.

A monopoly also represents a “closed system” where input from those outside the system can be ignored and where the few can dictate the solutions for the many.  A closed system is the least effective. The antidotes include transparency which would include at a minimum, complying with open meeting laws and posting meeting agendas, minutes, and audio of government meetings.

    • Blake Wolpert was elected to Commissioner on a 7 to 4 vote by Precinct Chairs on May 25, 2023. Republican Party caucus met to replace Commissioner Chuck Braden. Braden was not able to serve out his term.
      • Wolpert was elected commissioner in 2004. During his tenure, Commissioners created Fire Districts that were opposed by the VFDs and others.  Legal action was taken to reverse the decision that required intervention by the Indiana Supreme Court. 
    • One of the first actions taken by Commissioner Wolpert was to add a new full-time commissioner assistant position.  This action led to significant challenges and criticisms but was eventually approved.   A contract was developed to provide assistance pending a selection for the vacancy. More info at the following post: County Operations and Assessments
    • Beginning with the March 23, 2022, meeting, Commissioners, with the support of the local GOP leadership, attempted to establish a policy restricting citizen questions at meetings. This decision was ignored by the citizens, and the policy was revoked by the commissioners.

Research on Candidates and Issues – Brown County Democrat Archives.  The archives for the Brown County Democrat can be accessed at the Library. 

Historical Election Results – General Election and Primaries

Examples – Election Forms – including for precinct Committeeman and State Convention Delegate

GOP Party Documents – State Party Rules 

2022 Convention Delegates:

2022 Convention Delegates – Mark Bowman, Cindi Wolpert, Blake Wolpert, Ben Phillips, Robyn Rosenberg Bowman (replacement for Chad Williams), Tanner Bowman (replacement for Diana Biddle.

There are 11 Precincts in the county –May 2020 Primary Election Results (Election winners received an average of 188 votes – from 58 (lowest) to 233 (highest). 

 

brown county 2020 precinct elections

Brown County Democrat: ELECTION 2022: Early voting times, Election Day polling places 

Brown County Precinct Map – Source https://brownin.wthgis.com/ 

Indiana Republican Party –  Precinct-Committeemen-Handbook-Final – 2020 (34 pages)

    • “Voters in the May Primary elect precinct committeemen”
    • When you became a Republican Precinct Committeeman/woman, you took on a vital leadership role to advance Republican principles of:
      • Lower taxes, Smaller government, Fiscal responsibility, Individual freedom, Strong national defense, Job creation, Family values

Other

Liberty Defense: We promote safeguarding your freedoms and preserving traditional family values. We defend all Indiana residents by keeping a watchful eye on those who represent you at the Statehouse.

2023-Candidate-Guide.Final  – Timelines and Forms

indiana Democrats Logo

Indems-Precinct-Committeeperson-Handbook-2021-1

Bean Blossom Overlook and Shelter House

Bean Blossom Overlook Shelter

The Bean Blossom Overlook was on INDOT property. INDOT removed the Shelter due to safety concerns.  The county now owns the property and a new shelter can be built.

Aug 4, 2023. The Parks and Rec board agreed to take the lead in building a new Shelter at the site. It is hoped that grants, and donations, including material and time will help keep the cost low. The County will continue to mow grass and provide insurance. Transferring the property from the county to Park and Rec was not needed.

July 19, 2023. Commissioners Pittman, and Wolpert, approved transferring the overlook property from the county to Parks and Rec with the caveat that the Parks and Rec Board would accept the property and would be interested in building a new shelter.  The assumption being grants and donations would fund the project.

Aug 19, 2022BRIGHT SPOT: Realtors build new picnic tables at overlook  

Oct 28, 2020.  Overlook shelterhouse to be torn down, rebuilt by Suzannah Couch

July 11, 2018, Nostalgic view: Bean Blossom Overlook brought back to original vision 

If you’ve driven past the Bean Blossom Overlook on State Road 135 North recently, you may have noticed a few changes: An actual view, with more cars and motorcycles stopping to take it all in.

In February, trees were cut to restore the site to the way it was more than 80 years ago — more overlook than forest. Visitors and residents alike have noticed, stopping to take photos, paint or enjoy a picnic.

The overlook was first established in the early 1930s when State Road 135 North was built. At that time, there were no trees to block the view from the first shelterhouse, which was just below the current shelterhouse.

County Audit Reports for 2022 – Published July 7, 2023

SBOA2

July 7, 2023. Website -State Board of Accounts, Audit Reports for Year 2022. 

B61791 Financial Statement Audit Report

    • Report on the Audit of the Financial Statement – Adverse and Unmodified Opinions

      We have audited the accompanying financial statement of Brown County (County), which comprises the financial position and results of operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statement as listed in the Table of Contents.

      Adverse Opinion on U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

      In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for Adverse and Unmodified Opinions section of our report, the financial statement referred to above does not present fairly, the financial position and results of operations of the County as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

      Opinion on Regulatory Basis of Accounting

      In our opinion, the accompanying financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position and results of operations of the County, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, in accordance with the financial reporting provisions of the Indiana State Board of Accounts described in Note 1.

  •  B61792 Federal Compliance Audit Report

Purpose of This Report

The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and
compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the County’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the County’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

Audit Reports and Contents

Public Hearing Notes and Audio- Sewer Expansion, July 14, 2023 Deadline for Comments

bcrsd signs yes and no

Updated July 11, 2023

Deadline. The Public Hearing was a required step in the process.  The deadline for final comments is July 14, 2023. You can send any comments to BrownCountyRSD@gmail.com or HelmsburgRSD@gmail.com

This post at Brown County Matters

No Vote at this time – Eastern Corridor. Phase 1 of the project includes a Western Corridor (Helmsburg to Lake Lemon) and an Eastern Corridor (Helmsburg to Bean Blossom to Woodland Lake.). I’ve been following this issue since 2016, routinely attend the BCRSD Board Meetings and have reviewed all of the supporting documentation.

The presentation confirms my previous assessments – the Eastern Corridor should be put on “pause” until the need is validated and there is evidence that the scope of the investment and strategy justifies the expense. It is also important to confirm community-wide support.  

In contrast, the Western Corridor has validated the need and has obtained community-wide support.

Public Hearing – Presentations:

    • Agenda – 2023_07_08 Agenda Public Hearing Sewer Expansion HRSD BCRSD
    • Audio – Part 1 Presentation (1 hr. 11 minutes)
      • Despite comments by the BCRSD Board members to the contrary:
        • “Soils” in Brown County are suitable for septic systems.  Soils are tested before a permit is issued.
        • Impaired “waterways” are not primarily due to waste from failing or inadequate septic systems. Per BCRSDs Watershed Study (pg.63), only 5 of the 22 water samples identified the majority of E.coli as being of human origin.  “…pastureland loads more E.coli to Brown County steams than other sources under all modeled septic failure modeling scenarios.  Only if 100% of documented septic systems are failing do they contribute a significant volume of E.coli to the entirety of Brown County.”  (Watershed study, pg. 69-70)
    • Audio Part 2  – Comments and Questions. Citizens were limited to 2 minutes.

Community Support?  The BCRSD Prelimary Engineer Reports (PER) includes information derived from a taxpayer-funded wastewater strategic plan and watershed study. The plan and study provide the basic premise for the justification of need. The cost of the grant-funded project was $118,000. It required a 10-percent match — $11,800 — which came from the County.

BCRSD Board members refused to hold a public meeting to present their plan. This would have provided them with the opportunity to defend their arguments and conclusions, address questions and concerns and build community support if possible. This should have happened before moving forward with the development of the PER and the Public Hearing. (PER – Read Aheads).    

For the Record. I will be asking copies for of all the information submitted by approving officials and will post on Brown County Matters to help ensure responses to all submitted comments and questions were addressed.

Citizenship. American Citizens (top management) have a responsibility to be informed voters and to hold elected and appointed officials (and their contractors) accountable. We also have a responsibility for serving in the role of Jurists to ensure that decisions are based on both sides of an argument.  Brown County taxpayers have contributed over a million dollars in support of this project.

Balanced Argument.  The presentation at the Public Hearing represents a one-sided closing argument “by the prosecution.”  Citizens have the opportunity to provide their input by July 14, 2023.  The process requires that responses to be provided by the project sponsors – BCRSD and HRRSD.  Approving officials have an obligation to review all the information presented before making a decision.  By federal and state statutes, Citizens (unbeknownst to many) do have the right to question or appeal any final decision which should involve a review by subject matter experts that are independent, objective, and represents citizen interests as opposed to those advocating and benefiting from this project.  Information from this phase also becomes part of the record.

Additional Information

2023+ Discussion – County Ops and Assessments, Meetings

Updated  Nov 3, 2023

assessment gears

These government meetings include elected officials and county department heads/employees. The purpose is to discuss issues and concerns within the county government. The meetings, with the support of the commissioners, were initiated by Gary Huett, President of the County Council. The intent was to identify and address issues and concerns and start to build trust.  Building trust will require follow-through and changes that will improve results through more effective policies and practices.

Meetings are on the first Thursday of the month, 2:00 pm, Salmon Room, County Office Building

Nov 2, 2023. This was the 6th County Roundtable Meeting. Employees, Council (Huett, Swift-Powdrill, Kirby), Commissioner (Sanders).  See link for notes on the previous sessions.

… Unelected 4th commissioner (s)?

  • Job (Position) Descriptions (PDs)– HR Director and Commissioner Assistant. The PDs are being revised – this will be about the “3rd time” for revisions to the “new” commissioner assistant position.
  • A Little History on the Positions Drama.   Last fall, the commissioners and council determined that a commissioner assistant was not needed. They converted it to an HR Director Position and also funded a part-time receptionist/clerical position. The person that was in the assistant role (Melissa Stinson) left the county to accept a position in Monroe County. In the 2022 primary election, commissioner Biddle, who stated in her campaign that she was the first full-time commissioner in county history, lost in the primary to Ron Sanders. Sanders was elected in Nov. Sanders is not a favorite of the local GOP establishment and is often the lone decenting vote on policy issues being pushed by the local GOP.
  • Local GOP. The local GOP leadership has the influence to support candidates for council and commissioner who may not have the desire, commitment, or time to devote to their positions. There is a steep learning curve that some may choose not to climb. Thus, having a “full-time” person in the commissioner’s office may be perceived by the local GOP leadership to offer more control over the direction of the county, including “influencing” staffing, personnel, and funding priorities.
  • HR Director.  The HR Director position, it was structured under the theory that the council along with the commissioner’s office and auditor could provide policy and supervisory control over the individual in the position. It was later learned that only the commissioners have supervisory authority. This lack of control over an important position upset some of our elected officials.
  • New Commissioner Assistant. When Commissioner Braden resigned due to job conflicts, the local GOP on a vote of 7 to 4, elected Blake Wolpert as the interim commissioner. Among his first acts was to take action to re-employ Melissa Stinson – initially as a contractor, while at the same time, creating a new full-time commissioner assistant position. This position was first approved in the absence of a formal commissioner meeting and then approved by the council. It was then learned that the commissioners have sole responsibility for position description and the council only over the pay grade. Despite the budget deficit, the revised PD and pay grade were then updated and approved by the Commissioners and council. The position vacancy was advertised, there were several applications, and Melissa Stinson was hired. Melissa is also the secretary of the local GOP.

The controversy over the assistant commissioner position including the need, roles, and responsibilities were discussed in the previous meetings (see below).

Transparency. I assume the new PDs for the HR Director and Commissioner Assistant will be discussed at the next commissioner meeting where they may take a vote to approve before the public has an opportunity to review the PDs. I suspect that the changes will reflect a shift of more power and control from the HR Director to the commissioner assistant thus allowing the local GOP to restore their influence and serve in the role of an unelected 4th commissioner.

Initial discussions on the PD referenced an administrator role vice assessitant role.  An “administrator” would fall  with a “professional” category supporting a higher salary grade.

A few years ago, the county experimented with having a full-time “Executive Administator.” This turned out to be problematic and was eliminated.

  • GOP Monopoly on Power. Note that a one-party monopoly on political power, can PREDICTABLY, lead to the centralization and abuse of power where the special interests can determine policy and funding priorities. The local GOP is led by realtors who understandably, advocate for development (which can pose a conflict of interest), as opposed to the quality of life and cost of living-related priorities.
  • May 2024 Primary. All 11 Republican precinct chairs will be on the May primary ballot that offers a “referendum” on GOP leadership. Given the winners in the primary will very likely be elected in the Nov general election, cross-over votes by Democrats in the primary can help shape the direction of the county. There will also be two commissioners on the ballot and three council seats. At the county level, issues are not red or blue. Challenges are managing within a budget, roads, bridges, infrastructure, police and fire protection, and the other critical core government functions.

Other Topics

  • Longevity/Seniority.  – Returning Employees. When an employee quits and then is re-hired, should their longevity (seniority) related benefits be restored? T-Be-Determined. .

Budget Questions.

  • $150K was budgeted for “attrition recovery.” This was unique and explained generally as supporting turnover-related expenses. This would include the training-related cost of hiring a new sheriff deputy. It could also be used to immediately hire a new employee before the previous employee has left.
  • $2,000K stipend. This was questioned – apprears that it can be used to pay for an employee to attend a government meeting after business hours, For example, the second commissioner meeting of the month is at 6:00 p.m. and council meetings at 6:30 pm.
  • New Health Insurance Benefit?  A proposed new benefit was discussed. Should employees who opted out of the county health insurance plan be provided with a supplement to cover visits to the wellness clinic? It was estimated that this may cost an additional 16-18K a year for up to 20 employees. This could be less expensive to the county than if they opted for a health insurance plan

Oct 5, 2023.  This was the 5th meeting of elected officials and department heads/county employees.   There were 5 of the 7 councilmen present, no commissioners, and one county employee.

An interesting discussion on the budget. We have about $1.5. to 2 million dollars more in expenses than revenue.  About 20% of our budget (5 of 20 million) is spent on the Justice System – that includes the sheriff’s office,  Courts, Probation, Corrections et.al.  (In Nashville, (population 1,000), the cost of their police Department has been reported to be over over 50% of their budget.)

Of those on probation due to OWI, the majority are from out of the county.   This leads to the question as to what percent of the people running afoul of the justice system live in the county as opposed to outside the county?

In addition to justice system-related expenses, the county also finances police and emergency medical support for the State Park.  Historical efforts by the county to be reimbursed for this cost has fallen on very deaf ears at the statehouse.   Brown County State Park is a cash cow for the state and revenue is shared with the other state parks.

Sep 7, 2023. Meeting #4. County Operations – Continuation – Roundtable Discussion Sept 7, 2023 – 2-4 pm.

    • Next Steps – Get through this year’s budget submittal and start working on some improvements.  Given the budget challenges this year, the resolution of some issues has led to a little more in-depth understanding and knowledge of finance, accounting, and budgeting challenges.
    • Overall:  An assessment is that the county has about $1.5-2 million dollars of more government than we have the budget to support. This is a hard reality and requires leaders to be more deliberate in spending. Our accounting system can be a challenge in providing needed and timely information.
    • Salary Grade StructureAn Improvement. Councilman Redding briefed a concept of replacing the 30 pay grades with just a few “Tiers.”  It was well received – funding neutral at this point but a change would provide a better foundation for managing payroll, longevity pay, stipends, increases, et.al.
    • Salary – Market Rates and Turnover – Options?   The county is not competitive with pay – especially in the Sheriff’s Department which leads to turnover. An option is a “freeze” where the payroll accumulating as a result of vacant positions can be used to fund the higher pay of existing employees. This leads to the need to re-balance and reduce staffing.  Labor costs are always among the highest expense categories in organizations.
    • Grants. Contracting with grant writers (ARA in Columbus) was seen as an option for getting more money to fund operational costs.
    • Where does the money go? And how can other counties be paying at much higher levels than Brown County?    The common answer is that larger counties have a larger tax base with a more diverse commercial base.   Brown County is classified by economists as a Bedroom Community – people choose to live here and commute to jobs outside the county and many can now work from home. We are also a naturally occurring retirement community (NORC). Given this fact, the county opted for a tax policy of high income and low property tax. The low property tax contributed to the demand for land and homes that led to higher prices and homes considered unaffordable at the more modest income levels.
      • It would be interesting (and time-consuming) to do an analysis of the comparison between counties -ratios would be helpful. Would also need to identify outputs, volumes, etc.  Then you could compare things like cost per assessment, per record filed, permits granted, etc.
    • Some additional facts. On tourism, note this accounts for around 12 million in taxable wages. The total taxable wages for the county is over 425 million (in 2019). The land, terrain, country, and more rural lifestyle, are what has been attracting and retaining residents.  The age of poplulation is among the highest in the state and enrollment in schools has been consistently declining since 2009.
    • Vision? A little déjà vu – employees mentioned the need for a county vision, strategy, new comprehensive plan, and affordable housing. I started looking at these issues in 2016 and a few thousand hours later,  have a little understanding of the culture and economics … and a pretty good collection of documentation and research.   Up to now, there has not been a demand for any major changes – the status quo has been seen as good enough.
    • SWOT. In making the case for change/improvement, can start with a SWOT analysis – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats/Challenges. Opportunities point to solutions that then require the identification of the scope and extent of the problem.   Supporting information at https://browncountyleadernetwork.com/  
    • Inefficiencies 20-40% OF Budget?   In the quality profession, a general rule of thumb is that inefficient processes, procedures, internal controls, SOPs, etc.,(cost of poor quality – CoPQ) can range from 20-40% of the budget.

Aug 3, 2023 Govt Meeting #3 2-4 pm.   These meetings have been moved to one a month – the next one is Sept 7, 2023, 2-4 pm.   Some of the issues covered at this meeting were also addressed at the Aug 4 commissioners’ meeting.  This post at Brown County Matters.

Main agenda topic was on the compensation (salary) system and the need for a major improvement. Benefits are another important consideration regarding a total compensation system.

Budgets. The counterbalance to total compensation benefits and costs is revenue. When working to develop a new annual budget, the county starts off with a 1 to 1.5 million dollar deficit. This does not include unfunded costs associated with needed repairs and replacement of infrastructure.  For instance, there is a need to replace air condition units at the jail at a cost of 640K plus.  There is only 75K left in the 3 million capital improvement loan that will be paid off in 2024 at which time a new loan can be obtained. Given increasing interest rates, it is likely that property taxes will have to be increased unless less money is borrowed to keep the rate about the same.

    • Note that money from the loan was inappropriately applied to cover operating expenses (ambulance contract). The county has not been required to reimburse the fund.

Proposed New Position. A follow-up on the controversy regarding the proposed new commissioner’s assistant position and the job description was not on the agenda and appears to be on the back burner at this point. Two complaints were filed with the state’s public access counselor regarding the process for approving the proposed new position. Employees also raised issues with the need and quality of the job description at the approved pay grade.

New Service Contract. At today’s (Aug 4, 2023) commissioner meeting, a new service contract for Melissa Stinson (former admin assistant). She will be providing as-needed/requested assistance to the commissioners at a rate of $25.00 per hour.  She will be receiving a 1099 vs a W2. Commissioners Pittman and Wolpert voted to approve the contract; Sanders was the No vote.  The desire for a full-time assistant started with the appointment of Wolpert to the commissioner vacancy as a result of the resignation of Chuck Braden. No detailed explanation as to why a full-time assistant was needed – justification was anecdotal. The invoices should provide the detail as to what specific services are being provided.

2024 is an election year and two of the commissioner positions (Pittman, Wolpert) are on the ballot.  Good opportunity for voters to ask the prospective candidates about duties, roles, responsibilities and level of commitment.

Compensation (Salary) System.  The county system – well-intentioned, has evolved over time to include “35 grades” and is contributing to conflict and lower morale. The Council is looking to find a better system. Of the 92 counties in Indiana, I would suspect that there may be at least one system that would come close to meeting county requirements.   Federal and State governments have figured out the issues and challenges.  Appears counties are on their own. Is the State Personnel Department a resource that can be used to provide some advice and support?

Benefits.  Part of the compensation package are benefits.  The council identified that employer taxes such as  FICA and PERF (state retirement systems) add about 18% to salary costs.  Health Insurance is also an added cost – counties cost averages about 10K per employee (1.5 million/150 employees). The cost of the clinic and pharmacy can average about 2K per employee (300K/150).   Another intangible benefit is job security, holiday/paid leave, and working hours and conditions.

On Health Insurance, the county is self-insured.  The employer costs of defined plans available for State employees can be around 7K a year for a single person and 20K for a family. The self-insured option is less expensive but has higher risks if there are a number of serious health issues.  Consequently, building up a saving account is imperative – another potential unfunded liability.

Policy – Position Descriptions.  A first step in addressing fairness and compensation issues regards position descriptions. For 20+ years (?), the council has been assuming the responsibility to review and approve but it has recently been discovered that position descriptions are a commissioner’s responsibility. The council is responsible for ensuring the appropriate level of funding.  An interesting finding – both the commissioners and council pay for legal services and updates of position descriptions have been contracted out to a company that performs this task for other counties.  Indicates a weakness in internal controls at many levels.

Internal Controls.  Effective internal controls require a review of the statutes that govern an office. You then identify the stated, implied, and essential tasks. Essential tasks are those that if not performed, result in mission failure.  Internal control is the checks in place that prevent failure.  At the federal level, an annual review of internal controls is required of all agencies including their respective departments and branches.  The purpose is to ensure the effective and efficient use of taxpayer dollars.

    • Note also the process involved in managing internal controls also supports a review of position descriptions.  Identification of the tasks supports position classifications.

NEW Position Description Ordinance.  At the commissioner’s meeting Aug 4, 2023, a new position description ordinance was proposed.  The vote to approve was tabled until the next meeting to allow time for review,.

    • Note Indiana code “just” requires that citizens be informed of a new ordinance (via legal notices and two meetings) IF it involves a penalty or forfeiture.  The septic ordinance fell within this category. (IC Code 36-2-4-8).  A second reading can be waived IF there is unanimous consent of the voting members (IC 36-2-4-7).

Position Classification. My question on Job Descriptions regards the process for “classification.”  “A classification system groups similar jobs (with like duties, authority, responsibility, and qualifications) into the same position classification so that the same schedule of pay can be equitably applied.”  Example – State of IN https://www.in.gov/spd/compensation//

Link of occupational codes to a range of salaries. https://www.hoosierdata.in.gov/coder/

Citizens and employees should have confidence that a job is needed to perform the respective mission of the organization as required by statute, is “independently and objectively classified” and the salary is at the appropriate (and affordable) level.

July 21, 2023.  Meeting #2,. The second government meeting (departments, employees, elected officials). The first meeting was on July 7, 2023, from 2-4.  One of the strengths in the county is the longevity of many employees, which can bring some context to several issues to include those related to staffing issues.

Topics covered at the first meeting included: Pay, pay comparisons with other counties, county finances, personal administration and policies, health benefits and employee costs, position management, working conditions, culture, policies, procedures, budgets, communication, and county economics. This is expected to be the first of many future meetings.  The caution should be that identifying problems without following up with practical and successful solutions can do more harm than good.

I tried to capture as many of the points and issues as I could.  I’m sure I missed things or did not capture the sentiment of what was expressed. I did add some of my commentary and links to additional information on the topic.

One of my goals over the next 12-18 months is to develop a “Brown County Fact Book”  with sources to help support a fact-based perspective on the county, including economics, culture, jobs by type and industry,  employment, demographics, population, tax rates, plans, studies, local politics, et al. I’ve been collecting (and sharing) some of this information since 2016.

July 21, 2023 Meeting.

Council Members in attendance: Huett, Kemp, Kirby, Byrd, Swift-Powdrill (Rudd, Redding absent). Commissioners: Ron Sanders. (Pittman, Wolpert attended the first meeting).

The Hot Topic – in the Long-Run – Compensation – Pay and Benefits. Councilman Kemp identified his observation that pay was not adequate and needs to be increased.

This immediately creates the expectation that changes will be made to address the situation.  What was not discussed was how this would be funded. Commentary:

    • The county is funded primarily by income and property tax. We have to renew a loan (went from 2-3 million) to finance capital improvements (infrastructure). As reinforced at the meetings (and a repeat finding by the SBOA), we have no capital improvement plan and budget but we started working on one. No question that we have unknown and unfunded liabilities.  Commissioner Sanders started confirming an inventory of buildings and emerging maintenance issues – for instance, AC unit replacements at the Jail at around 600k.
    • I’ve been attending commissioners/council meetings since 2016. My take:
      • The council made a policy decision in the 90’s to keep property taxes low and rely on income taxes. The county income tax doubled in 10 years and maxed out. A couple of years ago, the county shifted from increasing income tax to property tax. BUT, given the constraints of state tax policy, we have been limited to only very minor increases in the property tax rate (determined by a growth quotient).    
      • Changes in property tax bills primarily reflect higher assessments due to market conditions – not as a result of the council increasing the tax rate.
      • My understanding. The state does not allow a county to max out the income tax rate and then shift and start trying to max out the property tax rate.  The county still has among the lowest property tax rates in the state.
      • In 2018, former Councilman Keith Baker facilitated a meeting by our financial consultant at the time (Umbaugh) to explain the tax policy. Umbaugh and Associates (Now BakerTilly) provided a presentation at the library that illustrated the complexity of our tax system – The Basics of Local Government Budgeting.   The information included  “scenarios” (pages 22-24) regarding transitioning from the high-income tax rate/low property tax rate option. Good luck trying to understand it but knowledge is needed to understand the options for raising more tax revenue and the respective constraints.
      • Due to constraints on revenue, former councilman Critser and Baker worked to balance revenue with pay and benefits. This included pay freezes (5 years at one time) and foregoing cost of living increases. Over the past few years, employees have been getting cost of living increases.
      • Baker led a Salary Study in 2018 that compared employee compensation with other counties of our size – the logic being that counties with a smaller population would have similar financial constraints.  In this comparison, Brown County’s compensation was among the best.
        • The exception in the study was truck drivers with CDLs that were paid more because of the turnover and competition.
      • This study was criticized by employees that believed their pay should be comparable with surrounding counties and near similar jobs. Higher populations result in higher revenue and bigger budgets. Higher salaries also can increase competition and expected levels of experience and education.  Turnover is an indication of non-competitive pay and benefits.
        • The sheriff’s office recently (2021) justified a pay increase. The cost associated with training deputies and turnover justified the higher salaries.  Ref: Deputies’ pay raise request approved by Suzannah Couch – 

Discretionary Offices/Department.  The two discretionary offices in the budget are the Veterans Office and Parks and Rec.  Other offices are required by statute.

2023 Indiana County Income Tax Rates – max is 2.5% that can be increased via a “Growth Quotient.”  Brown County’s income rate is frozen at  2.5234%.   The highest in the state is:. 2.9% (Wabash)

2023 Property tax Rates by County.  Property taxes are assessed by a taxing authority. Brown County shifted from increasing income taxes to property. Increases are limited to the “Growth Factor” determined by the State and given to all counties. The council can vote to accept (they usually do) or reject the increase.  Other taxes that be assessed on your property (wheel tax, school referendum other) are listed on your tax bill.

There are 2,080 taxing authorities in Indiana. In Brown County, these townships/conservancy, along with their tax rate and rank, include the following:

bc 2023 property tax rates

The Hot Topic —  New Commissioner Assistant Position.  The council approved the county commissioner assistant position grade 14 (42k), at their July 17 meeting with votes to approve by Huett, Kemp, Rudd, and Kirby. Darren Byrd, and Judy Swift-Powdrill voted no. Redding abstained (counted as a no vote).’

This topic also came up at the first meeting (July 7) with the expectation that action would be taken to validate the requirement, job description, and pay grade. Concerns were raised that their input was ignored, that the position was over-graded, pre-selected, full of redundancies and inaccuracies, and maybe not needed. Commissioner Sanders wisely declined to comment citing possible litigation. The decision for the new position was made by Commissioners Pittman and Wolpert in the absence of a public meeting.  

    • Note: I filed a complaint with the Public Access Counselor questioning if the decision by two commissioners to create a new position was in violation of open meetings laws.  I also filed a complaint questioning the validity of the vote by Councilman Rudd who voted via Zoom.

Pay Grades.  The county’s process for determining pay grades has been incremented over time and has resulted in  34-35 pay grades.  Information from other counties is being collected to help identify other options to include options for compensating experience. County offers $100.00 a year in longevity pay.  So, someone with 10 years of experience compared with a new hire in the same position, would only be making $1,000 more in salary.  Job positions also do not e include a range based on level of experience and education.  For example, an option could be that a position be advertised at a starting grade of 6 with automatic yearly promotions to a 9.

Job Descriptions and Classification. A surprise at the July 7 meeting was regarding position descriptions. The County contracted with a company to update all the job descriptions and the final versions did not include the input provided by the Departments.

The “So what? “ Job descriptions and classifications provide a baseline for pay and help with pay comparisons with other counties and the private sector. The inaccurate descriptions have led to requests for pay increases to compensate for the new/updated tasks. Once a position or pay is upgraded within one department, most everyone in the other departments may expect that they should also be receiving pay increases as well. An increase in one area starts a cascade which can contribute to lower morale and less trust and confidence in county officials.

Management Culture – Top Down. Another insight was the perception that the overall management culture is dictatorial vs collaborative.  Commissioners and Council identify a policy and everyone is expected to fall in line without question. This was interesting and correlates to the perception that major decisions by the council and commissioners are rarely influenced by citizen input.

Pay Comparisons. Pay differences compared with what surrounding counties are paying can be significant. Comparisons require accurate position descriptions.

Health Benefit Costs, Changes in the health insurance benefits had to be made to slow the rising costs (about 2 – 2.5 million a year). This led to higher costs for employees. The clinic is seen as a good feature, but depending on plan options, out-of-pocket expenses can be significant. The county is “self-insured and a few catastrophic illnesses could have devastating financial consequences.  The council and commissioners accepted the Risk instead of paying the higher costs associated with defined benefit plans.   For instance, at the State, just the “county “cost per employee is around $7,000 for a single person and $20K for a family.

Waste and Inefficiencies.  Areas identified as potential improvement were in using consultants as opposed to using/developing internal expertise for a variety of studies, plans, and project contracting practices.  It was also identified that new positions were created that included tasks that were previously routinely being done one or more by others.

Performance Reporting.  It was mentioned that one time, some departments would brief (or want to) their contributions at least once a year but the process was not encouraged or sustained.

    • Commentary. Each Department briefs its proposed annual budget. Adding in accomplishments from the previous year might be informative. Adding the review of performance and accomplishments as an agenda item at a commissioners/council meeting may also be helpful in building community trust and confidence in their local government.

New Source of Government Revenue? It was mentioned that the Music Center is having a good year. Any “excess profits” can be returned to the county as opposed to 75% (if legal) donated to the Brown County Community Foundation.  The Innkeepers tax is a county asset and managed by the county that was used as collateral for the loan to build the Music Center. It can be used for just about anything that supports tourism.

Cost of Living – Affordable Housing.  The county tax policy of low property tax has contributed to the high demand for land/housing, tourist-related businesses, and higher prices that have led to Brown County’s high median home values.

Bedroom Community. Ball State economists have identified Brown County as a bedroom community – people live here and earn their income outside the county. The majority of workers still commute to jobs outside the county (statsIndiana). We have also become a Natural Recurring Retirement Community (NORC).

    • The Brown County Community Readiness Initiative, a survey and economic assessment conducted by the Ball State Economic and Research Institute, concluded that Brown County’s greatest potential for economic growth is not tourism, but as a bedroom community. – BC Democrat – Sara Clifford

Population Projections 2020-2050. Brown County’s population is expected to decline and student enrollment has been declining since 2009.

Available Land. The fact that more than half our land mass is owned by the state and feds is seen as a detractor. However, it is also what attracts and retains new residents.

Expansion of Sewers and Economic Development?   Brown County has among the highest median home values in the State, supported by lower property taxes.  Consequently, homes are no longer affordable at modest to lower income levels.  Expanding sewers “may” lead to more housing but given market demand, prices may not be at the modest end of the affordability range.   The Brown County Comprehensive Plan (PDF) does not identify higher-density apartment options as a desired option.

Individual Performance Evaluation / Feedback.  This can be a debatable issue.  Individuals work within a system. The system determines the majority if not all of the result. Assessing the performance of the system is a good thing. Assessing individuals within the system can be problematic. Individuals and groups can choose to assess their strengths and weaknesses and improve goals that would contribute to improvements in the system.

Commentary — Some Ideas – Organizations – Groups

    • What is your purpose? Identify the Mission and Functions (tasks) for every organization.   Can post these on the website. Plenty of examples from other counties?
    • Why do you exist?  What is the link to governing statutes and regulations?
    • What are the mission-critical tasks – that if not done, result in mission failure?
    • What are the internal controls (checks) that you must have in place and follow to prevent mission failure?
    • What do you provide? Identify the services produced or provided, e.g., the outputs and the volume.
    • How well do you do perform your mission?  Assess organizational performance 
    • What’s changed?  Periodically review job descriptions, classifications, missions and functions, and performance.

The Brown County Leader Network offers a self-help guide for supporting continuous improvement.  Addressing issues included in the meetings can start with SWOT analysis.