Proposed New Septic Ordinance – For the Record

Uncategorized

The Latest Update on a Proposed Septic Ordinance

Current Timeline:  First Reading – April 21, 2021, Public Hearing – Apr 26, 2021, Comments due by 4:00 p.m. on May 3, 2021, Second Reading and Possible Vote on May 5, 2021.

May 18, 2021. Publication of the approved ordinance.

May 9, 2021.  BCM Facebook Post.   Approved Septic Ordinance- May 5 vote.

  • Written comments (approximately 27) were provided to the commissioners: 8 in favor, 17 Against, and 2 not clear.
  • Of those in favor, Five (5) of the individuals were involved in the revision, two (2) with interests in the septic system industry, and a one (1) was a local leader in the local GOP.

May 9, 2021.  Additional comments in an unpublished article from Commissioner Pittman in opposition to the now approved Septic Ordinance. I attend most if not all the BCRSD meetings to include those when Evan Werling was President – remember the issues very well.

May 5, 2021.  Second Reading.  Ordinance approved on a vote of 2 to 1.

May 5, 2021, WTIU/WFIU. Brown County Septic Ordinance Passes by Adam Pinsker

May 4, 2021.  BCD. Septic ordinance going to vote this week By Suzannah Couch

  • Article does not include references to all the comments submitted – the deadline for submission to the commissioners was May 3, 2021 by 4:00 p.m. Too late to be included in the Democrat.

May 4, BCD – GUEST OPINION: Some ‘whys’ behind the proposed septic ordinance by Richard Hall -BCRSD Board and Septic Committee Member

  • “Most committee members are not interested in engaging in further public debate about the need for the ordinance.”
 Apr 27, 2021. GUEST OPINION: Thoughts on the proposed septic ordinance update, By Commissioner Jerry Pittman.  Facebook Posts of the article:

Apr 22. 2021. WTIU/WFIU. Brown County Commission Advances Septic Tank Ordinance by By ADAM PINSKER

  • “Tank” ?

  Apr 21, 2021. BCD: COUNTY NEWS: First reading of septic ordinance ...

Mar 30, 2021. BCD. Septic ordinance status murky after years of work to redo it By

  • Mar 31, 2021. BCM – Facebook Post if the article: “Commissioner Pittman is doing the right things and reinforcing the need and opportunity to improve how the county develops new and updated ordinances. To summarize, identify and get agreement on the specific problem (s) before proposing solutions. A better process would help to build the needed trust of the citizens for any proposed changes. The information provided by the Health Department and Septic Committee provides further support for Commissioner Pittman’s position.”

Mar 16, 2021.  BCD, Septic ordinance work session packet posted – Staff Report

  • BCM Facebook Post on the meeting and results.
  • A rewrite of the Brown County septic system ordinance, which has been on hold in the approval process for several months, will be discussed in a work session among the county commissioners, health board and septic ordinance committee on Tuesday, March 23. This will be a public Zoom meeting starting at 3 p.m. (See login details below.)
  • “The public is welcome to attend to listen and gather information, but we will not be taking public comments during this work session,” reported health department employee Judy Hess.
  • Join the meeting at https://zoom.us/j/2808113181, meeting ID 280 811 3181.
  • REPORT by some members of the Health Board and Septic re-write Committee:  Septic-Ordinance-Presentation

Feb 28, 2021. The president of the Health Board, Thomi Elmore, submitted a “paper” to the commissioners in support of the Health Board’s recommended approval for a proposed septic ordinance. Nothing new. Contrary to their conclusion p. 23, they did not present sufficient justification to support the commissioner’s decision to approve. In fact, just the opposite.

Jan 12, 2021. Letter: “Brown County citizens’ rights” and septic ordinance by Commissioner Jerry Lee Pittman

Dec 29, 2030. Reasons for septic ordinance rewrite questioned at meeting By Suzannah Couch,  BCM Facebook Post of the article

  • At the Nov. 18 commissioners meeting, a first reading of the ordinance was done and was approved 2 to 1 with commissioner Dave Anderson voting against. The next step is a public hearing, after which changes could still be made.
  • Chuck Braden will take over Anderson’s spot on the three-member board of commissioners at the beginning of 2021.
  • Pittman said on Dec. 16 that he had received an offer from a local group, the Brown County Leadership Network, to help develop the ordinance “in a way that would be completely transparent and hopefully acceptable to the majority of people in Brown County.”

Nov 24, 2020. BCD, GUEST OPINION: Justification lacking for proposed septic ordinance, by Tim Clark

Nov 24, 2020. BCD. Public hearing slated for next week, by Sara Clifford.

Nov 17, 2020. Legal Notice of Public Hearing  Proposed Septic Ordinance  Nov 30,  2020, 6:00 P.m. – Zoom – Copy Proposed Septic Ordinance

Sep 29, 2020.  BCD. DIY septic causes concern By  

Sep 15, 2020. Health Board Meeting – Summary at Brown County Matters. (DIY Septic Installations)

Current Draft – Septic Ordinance — Commissioners comments in Red

Sep 1, 2020. BCD. Health department releases draft procedure manual By Sara Clifford

  • The SOPs have come up in public debate about the septic ordinance since at least 2018, when an earlier draft of the ordinance was removed from consideration because of concerns from the public and elected officials.
  • During a March 2018 meeting to discuss the draft ordinance, multiple speakers told the county commissioners that they wanted to know how the health department was going to enforce the ordinance before it was passed, like what happens to a person whose septic system is deemed to be failed. The current septic ordinance — which was passed in 1997 — does not list procedures.
  • Passing the new ordinance before understanding the “how” behind it was “putting the cart before the horse,” objectors said about the version that was considered in 2018.

NEW Aug 25, 2020. Received the draft copy of the Policy and Procedures Manual with a dated of Feb 14, 2020.  This manual was referenced in previous versions of the draft ordinance and references have been removed from the current draft.

NEW Aug 18, 2020. Opinion by the Public Access Counselor that the Health Department has to provide a copy of the Draft Policy and Procedures Manual.

Note that the 2020 version of the proposed septic ordinance is the 4th time major changes have been proposed. The first time was in 2013, the ordinance was challenged in court, and invalidated to failure to follow required processes. Thank you to the Democrat for the archived story.

The premise for an aggressive septic ordinance and a county-wide sewer district

  • Brown County Democrat May 1, “2013”.  Brown County Commissioner John Kennard called Bean Blossom an “environmental nightmare” due to many failed septic systems in the town located north of Nashville. The comment came during discussion of forming a countywide sewer district. Kennard said the purpose of the district would be to increase the chances of Bean Blossom acquiring a grant to pay for installation of a sewer system for the town. Commissioners voted 3-0 to pursue formation of the district, which could include a septic maintenance program.
    • Since May 1, 2013, there has been no documented evidence that supports the claim of an “environmental nightmare” in Bean Blossom. The January 28, 2020 article in the Democrat – “Stream Sampling: Where’s the contamination coming from?” does not support the allegation of contamination caused by failed septic systems. To quote: “Is E. coli found in local waterways coming from humans or from animals? Short answer: We don’t know yet.”
    • Regarding the proposed Bean Blossom Sewer Plant, the past two Brown County RSD Board presidents – Evan Werling and Judy Swift- Powdrill acknowledged that there was no documented evidence of failed septic systems that would validate a need for a new sewer plant. At their Feb 11, 2020 board meeting, Brown County Regional Sewer District (BCRSD) board members acknowledged that they did not know of any evidence of failed septic systems in their district. Board President Mike Leggins stated that Brownies Restaurant in Bean Blossom closed as a result of a failed system. Septic systems designed for commercial use are approved and inspected by the State.
    • Note also that Cordry/Sweetwater Conservancy has a septic management program and water testing indicates no issues with E-Coli.
    • Current Events and History – Brown County Regional Sewer District – For the Record.

The reasons for the lack of support form citizens is that the proposed ordinances included the following:  (1) A focus on control, compliance, and fewer choices;  (2) Changes that exceed State requirements without being specifically identified to include an analysis as to costs and benefits for each new requirement;  (3) Too much power granted to Health Department employees to enforce compliance to include costly penalties, with no supporting standard operating procedures (SOPs) to explain the condition under which these mandates would be enforced.  The new ordinance is also proposing a reimbursement to the county of legal costs if residents lose their respective complaints.

Current Events 

Aug 4, 2020.  More changes made to septic ordinance draft  By oe Schroeder

Final-septic-ordinance-7-21-2020

July 21, 2020. Brown County Board of Health — 5 p.m. virtually on Zoom.  Board voted to recommend approval and to delete any reference to the Health Department’s Policy and Procedures Manual.

May 19. 2020.  Health Board Meeting. The “tweaked” changes suggested by Commissioner Biddle were used in developing the current version of the “draft” – Proposed New Septic Ordinance (3-10-20). This “draft” was reviewed/approved by the President of the Health Board – Thomi Elmore and Health Department employee John Kennard. Clint Studabaker – member of the Brown Couty, Regional Sewer District Board (BCRSD) also provided input on the “tweaks.”

  • Commissioners ignored (relatively) input provided by citizens via email to include the input provided at the Feb 19, 2020 Commissioner Meeting.

Mar 20, 2020. Public comments on proposed septic ordinance By Suzannah Couch

Mar 11, 2020. Democrat. COUNTY NEWS: ‘Tweaks’ suggested to septic ordinance

  • “Because we did not make a motion to approve on first reading, it is still considered a draft. We recommended a few tweaks to (health board President) Thomi Elmore,” commissioner Diana Biddle said during the March 4 meeting.

Mar 3, 2020.  Democrat. Public comments on proposed septic ordinance By Suzannah Couch, provided at the Feb 19, 2020, Commissioner meeting.

Feb 25, 2020. Septic ordinance first reading reset for March By Staff Reports.

  • The first reading was on the agenda for the Feb. 19 evening commissioners meeting, but no members of the Brown County Board of Health were present. The commissioners decided to postpone voting on the first reading until their evening meeting next month when health board members could be present to explain the rewrite.

Feb 19, 2020. Commissioner Meeting – Discussion – Proposed septic ordinance.  Notes posted at Brown County Matters.

Feb 14, 2020.  My written comments on the proposed ordinance submitted to the commissioners:

Feb 5, 2020, 9:00 AM Commissioner Meeting.  The proposed new septic ordinance was provided to the commissioners. The first reading is  Feb 19, 2020, Salmon Room, County Office Building, 6:00 P.M.  Written comments can be provided via email at commissioners@browncounty-in.us.

Feb 11, 2019. BCD.  Comments accepted on septic ordinance By By Staff Reports. 

  • “Next, it must go before the county commissioners for a first reading and two public hearings.” 
 Jan 21, 2020. Draft – The proposed Septic ordinance was passed by the Health Board and  will be forwarded to the Commissioners for consideration of approval.

Sep 3, 2019. BCD.   COUNTY NEWS: …. septic fee discussion By Sara Clifford  Fee increase requested for self-installed septics

Sep 3, 2019. Septic System Summit.  BCM Facebook post on key points.  Key points for me:

    • Panelists reinforced the importance of maintaining your system. Better maintenance equals a longer life of the septic system.
    • A failed and failing septic system can have an impact on the environment and health but any “spin” to create a perception that we have a high percentage of failures and health-related issues is not supported by the facts and evidence.
    • How long does a system last? The correct answer confirmed by two panelists is “indefinite.” The are many variables that factor into an estimate of useful life. These include type, design, age, water usage, maintenance, and soil types to name a few. Note that the “indefinite” conclusion is supported by the EPA and Presby systems. Indefinite defined as: “not definite, unclear; vague, lacking precise limits.
    • Scientific based studies applying valid statistical methods could be conducted in Brown County to develop an accurate estimate as to the useful life of systems. (See indications of a septic system failures below.)
    • Ernie Reed (Health Dept) reinforced that the “average” life expectancy was “estimated” at 25-30 years. Alice Quinn from the state department of health remarked that she expected her system to last longer than this.
    • Given a system can fail within one year, the upper range for the “average” could be in the 50-60 year range. Several people have told me that they have functioning systems that are within this age range.
    •  Indicators of a septic system failure? Can’t flush toilets an standing (smelly) water over the drain field. This water can pollute surface and groundwater. Streaking – the grass is greener over the septic field, is not necessarily a sign of failure if the drain tiles are within 16 inches of the surface.
    • High E-coli Levels in the Bean Blossom Watershed. Tests from the state indicate high e-coli levels. Tests for determining if E-coli is a result of animal (most likely) or human are not reliable at this time (per Alice Quinn, SDOH). IF one day it is determined that a certain percent is human-caused as a result of a failed septic system, the next step would be to determine the system or the number and location of systems that may be causing the contamination.
    • Background info – Septic System Summit

August 15, 2019.  Brown County Matters – Facebook Post – review of the ordinance.

July 30, 2019. BCD,  Proposed changes to county septic ordinance By Sara Clifford

July 17, 2019.  Draft Septic Ordinance Presented to Health Board 7-16-19

Apr 2, 2019. Update regarding proposed changes: BCD,  Time-of-sale septic inspection no longer being discussed, by Sara Clifford.

  • The septic ordinance committee met last month to review the changes they’ve made over the past eight months. Their task has been to update the county’s 1997 septic ordinance — a job that has been attempted at least three times before, the last one culminating with a packed public meeting at which residents went line by line over the last draft.
  • Kennard said an inspector is allowed to go to someone’s door unannounced, and the owner is allowed to tell him to leave. If that happens, he’ll come back with a warrant.
  • Kennard said that in his experience, what is holding back most people from fixing their septic problems is a financial issue.
  • The septic ordinance subcommittee has not yet approved a final draft.

Nov  28, 2018. Brown County Matters – Difficulty selling a house because of fears of a proposed septic ordinance.

August 21, 2018.  Septic ordinance committee expands, adds members. By Sara Clifford – Brown County Democrat

Past Events – 2018

March 30, 2018  Packed audience addresses septic ordinance revision

March 30, 2018  A plan to update Brown County’s septic ordinance is going back to the board of health for more work.

March 27, 2018.  BCD, Letter: Limit proposed septic ordinance’s scope  By Tim Clark …”In summary, update the ordinance as needed to comply with existing state code only.  “THEN” …  Form a project team or contract with a consultant to study and address the larger and more complex issues. 

PROPOSED changes to the Septic Ordinance  – 2018 Version and past article in the Democrat on the topic to include effects on other aspects of development.

State of Indiana – Residential Onsite Sewage Systems: 410_IAC_6-8_3

Brown County:

Past Events – 2017

I attended several public meetings last spring (2017) held by the commissioners and Health Board to discuss the initial version of this ordinance.  In addition to the general public, attendees included septic system installers, realtors, members from the RDC, APC, and Regional Sewer Board (RSB).  Articles in the Democrat that discuss what was covered in these meetings is provided below.

They (Commissioners, Health Board/Dept) have yet to communicate any compelling need to justify exceeding the state standards. Perhaps this will be provided at the March 29 meeting.

The NEW changes to the septic ordinance that exceeds the state code include county inspection standards, certification of inspectors, penalties, and fines, etc.  Note a  septic inspection is part of the process of buying a home and banks also often require inspections.  These are private sector functions.   

One of the issues that was continuously raised was for the ordinance to clearly identify what was required by state code and what was not. It was often stated that a  certain section was exactly like the state code when in fact it was not.

Participants also wanted to know exactly the justification for the higher standards that were going to be imposed by the county.  Another suggestion was that Standing Operating Procedures (SOPs) should be developed to clearly identify in detail, how the new standards were going to be administered and enforced.  It was recently stated that SOPs will NOT  be developed/available until AFTER the proposed ordinance is passed by the commissioners.  In other words, you have to pass the ordinance before you know how it is going to be enforced. This can lead to an abuse of power and corruption.

It was also reinforced in the meetings that this ordinance should be part of a larger wastewater treatment PLAN for the County.  There has been no action on this recommendation.  Dave Redding, President of the RDC in 2017, did identify a concept for a countywide strategy that could be further developed in coordination with the Health Board, Area Plan Commission and Regional Sewer Board.  No further action was taken on this suggestion.

(A “plan” is a written account of the intended future course of action (scheme) aimed at achieving the specific goal (s) or objective (s) within a specific time-frame. It explains in detail what needs to be done, when, how, and by whom.)

The justification last spring for the higher standards was based on assumptions, anecdotal information, speculation, conjecture, and opinions.  The commissioners did follow through to support a review by county attorneys to help identify and mitigate any potential liability issues.  This does not mean that the higher standards cannot be challenged in court.

The process that was applied in the development of this (or any other) ordinance “can be significantly improved” to provide voters with the assurance that elected and appointed officials performed their due diligence in thinking through all of the ramifications of the change.

An example of a problem resolution and County Decision-Making Process.  (Note the definition of a “Fact” vs a non-fact.)

Impacts – Proposed Septic Ordinance Changes — Articles and Letters in the Democrat

  • APC to discuss shrinking home, lot size minimums – Brown County … Feb 20, 2018 – Those rules are in Brown County’s recently revised septic ordinance, which is coming up for a hearing next month before the Brown County Commissioners. The APC talked briefly about making a special zoning district for tiny homes, or designating a pilot neighborhood for them, such as Helmsburg.
  • How small is too small? – Brown County Democrat  Nov 28, 2017 – The county’s septic ordinance is in the process of being rewritten, but composting and incinerating toilets are not in the proposed changes. Ritzmann said another option for discussion is placing tiny homes in “planned unit developments,” or PUDs. That would allow them to be hooked into a shared septic …
  • State: ‘Audit’ was requested by local health department  May 16, 2017 – What the report said. News of the state report first surfaced in a March 14 work session of the Brown County Commissioners and Brown County Health Board when they were talking about revising the local septic ordinance. Brown County Commissioner Jerry Pittman asked for a copy of “all state audits of …
  • Septic law’s impact on home sales reviewed – Brown County Democrat  Apr 18, 2017 – At the work session between the Brown County Commissioners and Brown County Board of Health on April 5, “dealbreakers” were discussed — parts of the county septic ordinance that might shut down all efforts to pass it. The septic ordinance hasn’t been fully revised since 1997. An attempt in …
  • Health board: Septic law will help plug data holes – Brown County … Mar 29, 2017 – That’s the answer Brown County Board of Health member Linda Bauer had to questions about why the new draft Brown County septic ordinance includes a new set of procedures for properties that are being sold. Health department employees have strong suspicions that there are large numbers of failed …
  • Health board: Septic law changes intended to protect residents Mar 7, 2017 – The Brown County Board of Health has written a new draft of the county’s septic system law, which hasn’t been overhauled in 20 years — and it is still in the … Many of the changes to the septic ordinance mirror state law, which has changed in several ways since the 1997 local law was written, health board …
  • Comparison: Key changes in draft septic ordinance – Brown County … March 7, 2017 / Brown County Board of Health members said many of the points in the new septic ordinance they’ve been drafting are the same as the 1997 version — though they’re in a different … Several people at the meeting mentioned a $400 inspection fee, which was published in a previous story in the Brown County Democrat.
  • Draft septic ordinance to be passed to commissioners  Feb 14, 2017. The Brown County Commissioners are likely to review a new proposed septic ordinance at a special meeting sometime in March, said commissioner Diana Biddle. The meeting time and date had not been announced as of press time. Most homes outside the immediate areas of Nashville, Gnaw Bone and Helmsburg are on …
  • Letter: Clarifications on proposed new septic ordinance  Jan 17, 2017 – Thanks to The Democrat and reporter Ben Kibbey for the coverage of the recent health board meeting and the discussion of proposed new Brown County septic ordinance. As the new ordinance has yet to be publicly released, Mr. Kibbey was not able to review the actual document for his article. I would like …
  • Letter: Recent buyer supportive of new septic ordinance  March 14, 2017.  In regards to the upcoming vote on the septic inspection (March 8 paper). As a recent purchaser of a home in Brown County, we were within days of closing on one property. It had passed the home inspection by my inspection.
  • County weighs septic rule changes – Brown County Democrat Jan 11, 2017 – The Brown County Board of Health is in the final stages of approving a new septic ordinance, and it could change how people buy and sell houses that are on septic systems. … 3, board members reviewed changes to the ordinance but will not vote to approve those changes until their Monday,

Maple Leaf Phase II: Sharing the risk?

Uncategorized

A few observations regarding the Maple Leaf  CVC/CVB budget discussed in the following article posted on the Brown County Democrat website:

Summary:

  • Maple Leaf started out as “their” (CVC) project funded with “their “money.   “They” determined the type of investment (music venue), size, scope, cost, management structure,  and location. The project was sold as “too good to fail.”
  • Consequently, commissioners and council justified their decision NOT to hold specific public hearings on the desirability and feasibility of this project.  Now it is acknowledged that yes indeed, this is a government-owned venue to be managed by a government-run agency.  Interesting shift – so if the project runs into problems and does not live up to expectations, blame “the government” as opposed to the CVC, CVB et.al. ?  Transfer the liability to the taxpayers?

Throughout the “marketing” of the Maple Leaf, the fact that this would be a government-owned and managed venue was NOT a major emphasis.  In fact, the President of the county council stated that the revenue from the innkeepers’ tax was “their (CVC)  money” and the council vote was just to approve the funding option. Commissioners also adopted a similar theme — they were just passing a resolution to support the funding option.

The President of the council also stated that if the project failed, the county would NOT assume liability for the debt. This would allow the bank to sell the venue to a private developer (at what would very likely be at a bargain price, e.g, too good to turn down).

The Commissioners and Council REFUSED to hold any specific public meetings to ask for citizen input on the desirability and feasibility of this project.   In fact, prior to their vote, the president of the council instructed the audience to limit their comments to “30 seconds”  but he did allow for longer comments.

In the print version of the paper (Feb 28, 2018, edition), there was an acknowledgment that Maple Leaf is a “government-owned music venue.”   Another statement in the article made by the project leader — Barry Herring:  “Once we’re up and running for 10 years, we paid all of our bills, we’re a government-run agency.“   Why aren’t they a government-run agency now?

Another interesting point is that up until the final approval by the commissioners, the revenue from the innkeeper’s tax was going to be used to pay the mortgage and profits would be made available to the county.  The last-minute change was that “profits” will first be used to apply to the mortgage and cover operating expenses.  The revenue from the innkeeper’s tax would be used if profits are not sufficient.

How is the “wealth” being shared?

Background information on Maple Leaf – Chronology of Events

Independents Can Unite America

Uncategorized

Independents Can Unite America,  By Terry Hayes & Greg Orman.  RealClearPolitics.com, February 27, 2018

  • …. a record 44 percent of voters now self-identify as independent, more than call themselves Democrat or Republican, and a majority (61 percent) desire an alternative to both political parties.
  • Leaders of the Unite America movement came together over the past few months to outline our shared principles, what we call our “Declaration of Independents”
  • Our principles are optimistic and hopeful, as we remain about the future of our politics. But these principles will ring hollow without leaders in office who not only articulate them but also govern by and remain accountable to them.

Unite America – Strategic Plan

Unite America – Country over Party Unite America is a movement of Democrats, Republicans, and independents who are committed to bridging the growing partisan divide in order to tackle our largest challenges and leave a better country to future generations.

ROI Ready Schools Community Survey

Uncategorized

The survey was completed in conjunction with the Regional Opportunity Initiative (ROI) Ready Schools Grant. The interviews were conducted by the  Education and Workforce Advisory Team (EWAT).

Themes that emerged from the 115 interviews: Brown County Community Profile Group 20180226

More info:

Future of local economy?

Uncategorized

Feb 4, 2018. Most Indiana Counties Should Stop Pursuing Economic Growth by Michael J. Hicks, Ph.D. Director tor of the Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University.  Keyword “Most”

GUEST COLUMN: A study of tourism and economic sustainability Sep 20, 2017 –  By TIM CLARK, guest columnist. Economic impact studies of tourism in Indiana and Brown County reinforce the benefits of sustaining a tourism industry. However, tourism, by itself, has not and cannot provide a sustainable economic future for Brown County.

Survey Results, Community Readiness Initiative (CRI). Presented by David Terrell, Director, Indiana Communities Institute and RUPRI Center for State Policy, Rural Policy Research Institute, Ball State University 2017 Community Readiness Initiative Presentation

Summary of the presentation provided by Sarah Clifford, Brown County Democrat,  What are best bets for future of local economy? – Brown County …

May 4, 2017.  Brown County’s greatest potential for economic growth is as a bedroom community, according to economists with the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. But local leaders had a different viewpoint; they perceived recreation as the area with the biggest potential, and to them, … 
  • According to the state and federal data the Ball State researchers studied, retail is the least promising sector among the five studied.
  • While Brown County — and especially Nashville — have a lot of retail businesses, those individual businesses don’t employ large numbers of people, Terrell said. “It doesn’t really drive your economy. It’s the wrong kind of retail,” he said.

Indiana Average Hourly Wage Trends

Uncategorized

The county income survey in 2017 indicated that 53% of residents fall in the low to moderate income level.  This qualified the county to apply for comprehensive planning and for economic development strategic planning grants. (1)

What are the actual and projected average hourly wage trends in Brown County?  An economic development strategy for the county was not identified as a priority in 2018 by the new Redevelopment Commission (RDC), commissioners or council representatives (Baker, Critser, Byrd) at last night’s (Feb 8, 2018) RDC meeting.  No update was provided on the status of the county’s application for an economic development strategic planning grant.

Indiana Economic Development Corporation – Average and Project Wage – 2006 – 2017.

References – More Information

(1)  Brown County Income Survey -(copy sent to residents).   The Low to Moderate Income(LMI) level determined by dividing the total number  “above” the respective income level by the total number of those below.  See also:  Overview of the Calculation Process for the Moderate Income Level

(2) IU SPEA Report –Redevelopment Analysis – Brown County.  Prepared by Liza Bartlett, Daniel Lopez, Drew Sherman

Brown County Democrat, GUEST COLUMN: A study of tourism and economic sustainability

 

 

 

RDC Meeting – February 8, 2018

Uncategorized

Brown County Commissioners, Brown County Council and Brown County Redevelopment Commission — 6 p.m., Salmon Room, County Office Building.

Agenda includes establishing guidance, structure and common goals among the three boards for moving the county forward economically; election of redevelopment commission officers; and other business.

Link below to the RDC Annual Report that includes suggested priorities for 2018:

RDC Reports:

 

 

 

Connecting the Community

Uncategorized

Working together towards a more perfect county

As of January 29, 2018, The Indiana Nonprofit database identifies 284 organizations in Brown County – many of which are dedicated to improving the quality of life within the county.  This list does not include county government, schools, boards, and commissions. It also does not include other improvement related initiatives such as the Salt Creek Trail Project, Wellness and Heritage Tourism, Leadership Brown County, etc.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2018 significantly reduced the number of people that can claim a tax deduction for a charitable contribution. This will make it even more important for nonprofits not only to work together more efficiently but also to document and report their effectiveness to potential donors.

“Connecting the Community” aligns with Principle 4.0 — State of the County – Annual Assessment and Report.

The following initial plan is intended to develop a community support network among non-profits. The Plan, Do, Study, Act Cycle for continuous improvement and learning is used as the project management format.

PLAN a change or test aimed at improvement. 

  • Connect the community and non-profits, provide visibility, and mutual support for respective improvement initiatives.
  • Coordinate strategies through the Hometown Collaborative Initiative (HCI)  supported by the State of Indiana – Office of Community and Rural Affairs (OCRA), Purdue University and Ball State University.
  • Apply a standard format for capturing strategic plans and any performance-related plans. This information includes Vision, Mission, Values, Goals, Objectives, and Stakeholders.

DO – carry out the change or test (preferably on a small scale).  

Examples of the concept, tools, and plans 

The platform and principles for “Independent Voters” is another initiative to raise community expectation for planning and collaboration that support continuous learning and improvement.

STUDY the results. Examine the results. What did we learn? What went went well and what did not?

  • Review results on a periodic basis. This would include the number of organizations/projects added to the database, feedback from stakeholders, etc.

ACT. Adopt the change, abandon it or run through the cycle again.

  • To Be Determined (TBD)

References and Background Information

  • The Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) Cycle – also known as the Shewhart Cycle for Learning and Development is a continuous quality improvement and learning model consisting of a logical sequence of four repetitive steps.
  • During WWII, quality control methods developed by Walter Shewhart and W. Edwards Deming were applied to improve the quality of war materials produced during WWII. After the war, these methods were declassified and shared throughout the world – most notably starting in Japan.
  • After the war, quality experts and manufacturers sought ways to sustain the many quality-improvement techniques used during wartime and formed the American Society for Quality (ASQ). Today, ASQ has become a global organization, with members in more than 130 countries.
  • The U.S. Department of Defense built on lessons learned during the war and created Military Specification MIL-Q-9858A (Quality Program Requirements) of the U.S. government (first issued as MIL-Q-9858 on April 9, 1959, and revised to MIL-Q-9858A on December 16, 1963).
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO).  MIL-Q-9858A is the origin of the ISO 9001 standard and all other quality management system standards and regulations around the world. MIL-Q-9858A was titled “specification” because it was intended to be used as a contract specification for military contractors. However, it is actually a “quality management system standard” in its nature. It was withdrawn by the U.S. government in 1996 because of a policy decision to support industry consensus standards over government directives. These voluntary standards are maintained by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).
  •  ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management System (QMS) is internationally recognized as the world’s leading quality management standard and has been implemented by over one million organizations in over 170 countries globally. The ANSI standard is identical to the ISO 9001:2015 standard.
  • Strategic and Performance Plans. ISO 17469:2015 provides a standard vocabulary and format for the information commonly contained in strategic and performance plans and reports. This includes  Mission, Vision, Values, Goals, Objectives, and Stakeholders.
  • The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) requires all federal agencies to develop five-year strategic plans outlining its vision, mission, long-term goals for the agency’s major functions, performance measures, and reporting results. GPRA Example – Department of Labor
    • General Accountability Office (GAO). GAO-04594T: RESULTS-ORIENTED GOVERNMENT: GPRA Has Established a Solid Foundation For Achieving Greater Results GAO issued a report reviewing the 10 years since the introduction of GPRA and has pronounced it alive and well. Read highlights from the report.

 

Do we have a corruption problem?

Uncategorized

corruption

The term corruption is often associated with instances of illegality.  A broader description of the term was recently described by Pope Francis.  He described corruption as to when a person’s conscience no longer registers right and wrong.  He went on to say that:

“The corrupt person cannot accept criticism, discredits anyone who criticizes him, tries to belittle any moral authority who would question him, does not value others and insults anyone who thinks differently. If the balance of power permits, he persecutes anyone who contradicts him.”

America’s founding fathers certainly understood that power corrupts individuals. The founder’s built-in checks and balances on power to help mitigate corruptive tendencies. Their concern was reinforced  by John Adams in his statement:

“The jaws of power are always open to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing.”

The broader description of corruption resonates with me.  I have written several guest columns in the Brown County Democrat on the process used to fast-track the Maple Leaf Project.

What was surprising to me was the feedback I received from many residents.  They thanked me for the articles and shared their concerns with the process and the project. They also expressed a fear of some form of retribution for themselves and others if they shared their concerns in a public setting.  Interesting that when I talked to even more residents to help determine if this (speaking truth about the use of power) was an isolated situation or a common belief within the culture, their perception is that it is common.

Many residents also told me that questioning the Maple Leaf project in public meetings and my articles on the topic would ensure that I would not be reappointed in 2018 to the Redevelopment Commission (RDC) – which I was not.  The commissioners and council did not and do not have to provide a reason.   I appreciated the opportunity to contribute to the county and will continue to do so.  More information on the fast-track process for the Maple Leaf project and the 2018 RDC appointments are available at Independent Voters of Brown County IN (all one word).

Share your opinion

Regarding the needs, culture and quality of leadership within the county, Brown Countians have an opportunity ( until Feb 20) to share their opinions in support of Brown County’s Hometown Collaborative Initiative (HCI).  The survey is available online at indianahci.org/communities/brown.php  I hope you also register for the community forum on March 7.

The HCI Initiative led to the creation of the Brown County Leader Network. A fact and process based approach for supporting improvements.

An individuals support or lack thereof for the platform and principles for Independent Voters can help provide needed insight for selecting quality candidates in 2018 and beyond.