Council Meeting – April 16, 2018

At the county council meeting tonight, the council received a general update from Kevin Ault of the Convention Visitors Commission (CVC). Questions to ask candidates that are running for election/re-election to the council:

Are you aware that Indiana Code (IC 6-9-14-4) requires the CVC to “annually prepare a budget … and to submit it to the county council for its review and approval”? Please explain the process to include identifying how citizens can obtain copies of the approved budget.

Are you aware that the CVB has an annual audit conducted by Blue and Company and the CVB also files an annual information report (990) to the IRS? Should these reports be reviewed as part of the annual review and approval process? If not, why not?

Are you aware that the improper transfer of funds would be considered a class D felony? Does the scope of the annual audit of the CVB include a review of internal controls?

Has a new CVC budget been prepared that includes the impact of Maple Leaf on the CVC/CVB budget? If not, why not? If so, where can citizens obtain a copy of the budget?

Maple Leaf – Fast-Track Process

The Maple Leaf Music Venue and Performing Arts Center is to be a Brown County, IN government-owned and managed venue.  It is a 12.5 million dollar facility. The money is borrowed by the county.  Any profits plus revenue from the Brown County innkeepers tax is used as collateral.  Taxpayers are paying for start-up costs that have included an initial  $30K legal bill.

Fast-Track Process

April 9. 2017. Commissioner Diana Biddle and Councilman Keith Baker attend a presentation conducted by innkeeper and CVC Member Barry Herring that introduces a concept for the Maple Leaf Performing Arts Center.  Both Biddle and Baker embrace the project and lead efforts to get the support of their colleagues on the commission and council.

June 20, 2017. A group led by local innkeepers propose a government-owned and managed performing arts center (music venue) at the Brown County Playhouse.

August 22, 2017. Request for Zoning Change, Area Plan Commission, Recommend approval by the Commissioners.

September 6, 2017.  9:00 am Commissioner Meeting. Zoning approved. It was stated that the approval was for zoning and not the project and that public meetings would be held regarding the desirability of the project.

The only official public meetings that our commissioners and council held on this $12.5 million county owned and managed music venue were to approve the project. 

November 15, 2017. Commissioners approve the project.

November 20, 2017. Council approves project.

Dec 20, 2017. Commissioners pass a final resolution approving the project.

SUMMARY –  Extracted from the following article: Dec 27, 2017. GUEST OPINION: The role of process in the future of Brown County. The Maple Leaf Performing Arts Center (MLPAC) project and the process used to fast-track approval may represent a turning point for the future of the county.  

  • In April 2017, owners of hotels and inns, who are also appointed to the Convention and Visitors Commission (CVC) and Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) decide to use the revenue collected from the innkeeper’s tax to invest in an asset that will promote tourism. The Innkeeper’s Tax is a pass-through tax paid by the party renting the overnight accommodations.
  • CVC members are appointed by the county commissioners and council. The CVB is a non-profit organization established to manage tourism related promotion on behalf of the CVC.
  • CVC/CVB members decided on a music venue and performing arts center and also determined the size, location, scope, cost (12.5 million), and overall governance plan for the facility. Given that this investment is expected to result in overnight stays, their businesses will directly benefit from the investment, and the asset values of their establishments will likely increase.
  • Initially, county citizens were told that revenue from the innkeeper’s tax would be used to pay the principal and interest on the mortgage for the venue. Any profits were to be used for community and county infrastructure priorities.  The final terms of the deal are that profits would be used to make the mortgage payment and the revenue from the innkeeper’s tax would only be used if profits were not sufficient to make the payment.
  • A common perception in the county that was reinforced by the president of the county council, may be that the revenue from the innkeeper’s tax is “their (CVC) money.” This inaccurate perception may have contributed to a lack of transparency over the years regarding the management and expenditure of these funds.  This revenue, per statute, is a county asset. Commissioners and Council (elected by citizens) appoint CVC members who are subordinate to the citizens and their elected officials.
  • The approval of a 12.5 million dollar loan using the revenue from the innkeeper’s tax as collateral was approved by the commissioners on Nov 15 and the county council on Nov 20. The commissioners approved another resolution approving the project on Dec 20. In case of default, the venue would become the property of the bank, and per the county council president and the county financial consultant, county taxpayers would not be obligated to assume the liability.
  • No public meetings expressly focused on this important project were scheduled by the commissioners or council before their meetings to approve the project. The League of Women Voters of Brown County offered to facilitate a public meeting to address citizen questions, concerns, and issues regarding the project. Members of the CVC, the CVB and the informal team working on the Maple Leaf project declined to participate, as did several key elected officials.
  • The editor of the only newspaper in the county – The Brown County Democrat, did recuse herself from being the primary reporter because of a conflict of interest — her husband serves on the CVC. The Democrat welcomed opposing opinions in Guest Columns and Letters to the Editor.

More information and references: Maple Leaf Project – For The Record

Does the County function as an oligarchy?

Professors from Princeton University and Northwestern University respectively looked at more than 20 years worth of data to answer a simple question: Does the government represent the people?  Their conclusions identified that “The opinions of 90% of Americans have essentially no impact at all.” This study led to headlines in the international and national media that either suggested or declared that the U.S. was functioning as an oligarchy.

Oligarchy is a form of power structure in which power rests with a small number of people.” (Wikipedia)

If you review the fast-track process that was applied to approve the Brown County government owned and managed $12.5 million Maple Leaf Performing Arts Center (MLPAC), what would you conclude:

Does this approach model the actions of a republic (resentative democracy) or an oligarchy?

Photo OP of the Maple Leaf Project Team with Congressman Trey Hollingsworth (R). The photo was taken in the Salmon Room, County Office Building.

Specific Maple Leaf team members include: Diana Biddle (R) – County Commissioner and Maple Leaf Management Group); Keith Baker (R) – President County Council; Darren Byrd – County Council,  Maple Leaf Management Group; Barry Herring –  Maple Leaf Management Group, Conventions Visitors Commission (CVC); Bruce Gould – Maple Leaf Management Group, Convention Visitors Bureau (CVB);  Susanne Gaudin (R) – Maple Leaf Building Corporation, Republican Board Member, Brown County Election Board;  Mark Bowman, Chair, County Republican Party;  Robyn Rosenberg Bowman (R) – President, Maple Leaf Building Corporation.

* CVC members appointed by the commissioners and council. The CVB is contracted by the CVC to market tourism.

A question to Benjamin Franklin following the Constitutional Convention of 1787: “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, “A republic, if you can keep it.

More Information and Context:

Maple Leaf – Stop Digging

Letter to the Editor – Brown County Democrat – “Maple Leaf – Stop Digging” – Publication date moved to May 2, 2018. Letter titled: ‘Stop Digging’ on performance venue.

There is wisdom in the metaphor that states that if you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. The Democrat’s article published April 18, 2018, “Maple Leaf bid opening pushed back” continues to reinforce the challenges, consequences, and issues regarding the process and decisions that were made regarding this project.

The fast-track process applied to develop a government-owned and managed venue lacked transparency and the needed checks and balances to ensure citizens that the Commissioners and Council performed their due diligence.  Project originators and leaders who proposed this project included innkeepers that have a conflict of interest. An independent feasibility study was not done on their behalf to provide objectivity and to validate the concept, financial projections, and risks.

Further, Commissioner and Council approved the project and refused to hold public meetings to obtain citizen input regarding the desirability and concerns with this project. The Commissioner and Council also did not review the complete business plan at a public meeting before voting to approve this project. Representatives from the commissioners, council and the Maple Leaf project also refused the League of Women Voters offer to facilitate a community conversation to address citizen’s concerns and questions.

It’s not too late to stop this project. Identify lessons learned and market the project to the private sector. Brown County has the third highest debt per person in Indiana. We do not need more risk and more debt.

This project was forced on the community. If this venue is built and does not live up to expectations, it will likely lead to more conflict and divisiveness. It may also motivate action towards selling this venue at any cost with innkeeper revenue being used to cover any outstanding liabilities.

The county’s application for a State Stellar grant included a series of new projects that were identified without wide-scale community involvement. Community opposition led to the county’s non-selection for the grant. The hard feelings slowly faded away but are not forgotten locally or within the state.

If Maple Leaf is not reconsidered, the opposition could likely grow, and social media campaigns may discourage any company from wanting their name associated with this venue.

Ongoing opposition and conflict may also discourage visitors from attending events and visiting Brown County which can lead to a reputation that the county is a place to avoid. Advocates of this project have the option of raising private capital and financing this venue with their resources.

Tim Clark
Brown County

 

 

County Debt Levels

The “Debt Comparison Report”  as of Dec 31, 2016, provided by the State identifies that Brown County has the 3rd highest total debt per capita in the State.

Since separate legal entities (building corporations) were created to manage the Jail and now Maple Leaf, curious to know if the debt for these facilities figures into the total debt per capita calculation.

The contract for the Maple Leaf land purchase was in 2017. The contract for the Maple Leaf bank loan signed in 2018.

Reference:

See also:

  • GUEST COLUMN: A study of tourism and economic sustainability By TIM CLARK, guest columnist Economic impact studies of tourism in Indiana and Brown County reinforce the benefits of sustaining a tourism industry. However, tourism, by itself, has not and cannot provide a sustainable economic future for Brown County.
  • Per capita defined: equally to each individual; per unit of population; by or for each person   

County Economics – Income

The 2016 county income survey indicated that 53% of residents fall within the low to moderate income category.  This makes the county eligible for federal planning grants.

The data also identifies that 52.7 of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunches.

A summary of 2016 Indiana Tax Returns identified that 51% of individuals filing tax returns in the county report income of $30,000 or below.

Since 1999, there has been a downward trend in the number of residents reporting income under $50,000 and an upward trend in the number of residents reporting income over $50,000.  Overall, a downward trend in the number of residents filing returns.

State Tax Returns —  Income Trends by Category 1999 – 2016

State Tax Returns —  Income Trends by Category 1999-2018

 

School enrollment and closures

School funding is driven by school enrollment. Projections for Brown County Schools indicate continued declines in enrollment.

The Brown County Schools in their 2017/18 budget recommendations identified three scenarios regarding enrollments that would have an impact on school financing and infrastructure (page 6-7).  Their recommendations also identified the need for an economic and residential development policy.

A potential impact of declining enrollments is the need to close schools. Carmel schools are currently discussing the impacts of declining enrollments in their school system.  Why Carmel will consider closing schools

PROPOSED:   Support for Brown County Schools.  Development of an economic and residential housing policy that will help slow or reverse the downward trend in school enrollments.  Without an effective strategy, Brown County Schools may need to continue to cut the budget and rely on additional tax revenue from referendums.

Commissioners Candidates – Response to Questions

The responses by the candidates for Brown County Commissioner – District 2 to the questionnaire provided by the League of Women Voters. Responses were included in a Voters Guide published by the Brown County Democrat. Copies available at the Democrat.

See also: 2018 Voter Guide – Commissioner Candidates.  Includes commentary on the incumbent’s response to the question on planning.

'If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail!' - Benjamin Franklin

 

Inconvenient Truths about Maple Leaf

The Maple Leaf Music Venue and Performing Arts Center is to be a Brown County, IN government-owned and managed venue.  It is a 12.5 million dollar facility. The money is borrowed by the county.  Any profits plus revenue from the Brown County Innkeepers Tax is used as collateral.  Taxpayers are paying for costs that have included an initial  $30K legal bill.

Fast-Track Process

April 9. 2017. Commissioner Diana Biddle and Councilman Keith Baker attend a presentation conducted by innkeeper and CVC Member Barry Herring that introduces a concept for the Maple Leaf Performing Arts Center.

June 20, 2017. A group led by local innkeepers propose a government-owned and managed performing arts center (music venue).

August 22, 2017. Request for Zoning Change, Area Plan Commission, Recommend approval by the Commissioners.

September 6, 2017.  9:00 am Commissioner Meeting. Zoning approved. It was stated that the approval was for zoning and not the project and that public meetings would be held regarding the desirability of the project.

The only official public meetings that our commissioners and council held on this $12.5 million county owned and managed music venue were  to approve the project. 

November 15, 2017. Commissioners approve the project.

November 20, 2017. Council approves project.

Dec 20, 2017. Commissioners pass a final resolution approving the project.

SUMMARY –  Extracted from the following article: Dec 27, 2017. GUEST OPINION: The role of process in the future of Brown County. The Maple Leaf Performing Arts Center (MLPAC) project and the process used to fast-track approval may represent a turning point for the future of the county.  

  • In April 2017, owners of hotels and inns, who are also appointed to the Convention and Visitors Commission (CVC) and Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) decide to use the revenue collected from the innkeeper’s tax to invest in an asset that will promote tourism. The Innkeeper’s Tax is a pass-through tax paid by the party renting the overnight accommodations.
  • CVC members are appointed by the county commissioners and council. The CVB is a non-profit organization established to manage tourism related promotion on behalf of the CVC.
  • CVC/CVB members decided on a music venue and performing arts center and also determined the size, location, scope, cost (12.5 million), and overall governance plan for the facility. Given that this investment is expected to result in overnight stays, their businesses will directly benefit from the investment, and the asset values of their establishments will likely increase.
  • Initially, county citizens were told that revenue from the innkeeper’s tax would be used to pay the principal and interest on the mortgage for the venue. Any profits were to be used for community and county infrastructure priorities.  The final terms of the deal are that profits would be used to make the mortgage payment and the revenue from the innkeeper’s tax would only be used if profits were not sufficient to make the payment.
  • A common perception in the county that was reinforced by the president of the county council, may be that the revenue from the innkeeper’s tax is “their (CVC) money.” This inaccurate perception may have contributed to a lack of transparency over the years regarding the management and expenditure of these funds.  This revenue, per statute, is a county asset. Commissioners and Council (elected by citizens) appoint CVC members who are subordinate to the citizens and their elected officials.
  • The approval of a 12.5 million dollar loan using the revenue from the innkeeper’s tax as collateral was approved by the commissioners on Nov 15 and the county council on Nov 20. The commissioners approved another resolution approving the project on Dec 20. In case of default, the venue would become the property of the bank, and per the county council president and the county financial consultant, county taxpayers would not be obligated to assume the liability.
  • No public meetings expressly focused on this important project were scheduled by the commissioners or council before their meetings to approve the project. The League of Women Voters of Brown County offered to facilitate a public meeting to address citizen questions, concerns, and issues regarding the project. Members of the CVC, the CVB and the informal team working on the Maple Leaf project declined to participate, as did several key elected officials.
  • The editor of the only newspaper in the county – The Brown County Democrat, did recuse herself from being the primary reporter because of a conflict of interest — her husband serves on the CVC. The Democrat welcomed opposing opinions in Guest Columns and Letters to the Editor.

More information and references: Maple Leaf Project – For The Record

2018 Voter Guide – Commissioner Candidates

The 2018 Voter Guide published Wed, April 4, 2018, by the Brown County Democrat includes responses to questions that were sent to the candidates by the League of Women Voters.  Question 3 was on the topic of planning.

Candidates for county offices include County Clerk, Commissioner – District 2 and Circuit Court Judge. A candidate forum is scheduled for Wed April 11, 6:30 County Office Building.  All three Republican primary candidates are expected to be present.  These include Diana Biddle (incumbent), John Kennard, and Ronald A. Sanders.  Since one of the Democrat candidates for commissioner cannot attend – Jeff Fox, the League of Women Voters rules limit the other candidate – Kyle Birkemeier, to introductory remarks only.

Planning is how you identify specifically what citizens want and do not want in terms of change.  Transparency (honest and open communication) requires published plans that are developed with the input from the citizenry. (Examples of county plans below).

For the sake of disclosure, I was on the Redevelopment Commission (RDC) in 2016 and 2017 and was not reappointed in 2018.  Commissioners as well as the council did not and do not have to provide a reason for non-reappointments.  More info: 2018 RDC Appointment Process 

The election for Commissioner – District 2 represents a clear choice for the county.  Should citizens have a voice in the direction of the county or is the status quo good enough?   I included responses from Commissioner Biddle who is the current incumbent.  All the questions and responses from all the candidates are provided at the bottom of this post.

Question: “Do you support the development  of a County Comprehensive Plan and Economic Development Strategic Plan that provide community-supported guidance for all aspects of development and infrastructure and why and why not?”

Commissioners Biddle’s response:  “The current comprehensive plan was completed in 2012. Further development of the plan should include adding additional tools, such as area infrastructure maps, to our existing comprehensive plan . The missing piece for us an up-to-date zoning code to complete the 2012 comprehensive plan. This update is currently underway.” 

Note:  The county application for an economic development strategic planning grant was approved by the commissioners in December 2017 but is on hold pending the decision on the Van Buren Fire Station Issue.

The Brown County Schools in their the 2017 -18 Budget Recommendations identified that an effective economic development and housing policy had a direct impact on school enrollments, If enrollments continue to decline, it will likely lead to the need to close schools.  Note that there is no mention of schools in Commissioner Biddle’s responses.  Expansion of broadband internet is just one component needed in an economic development strategy.

Elsewhere in the voter guide, Commissioner Biddle identified what she considers three challenges: Courthouse Security, County Roads and Bridges, Broadband and other Infrastructure.

  • “County Roads and Bridges.”  See references below to standard practices in other cities and counties.
  • Broadband and other Infrastructure“.  A state law was created in “2013” that allowed the commissioners to show that adequate broadband services are unavailable in Brown County. The law allowed them to declare the entire county an infrastructure development zone. No action was taken in response to the law by the commissioners until 2018.  Ref: Brown County Democrat, Feb 20, 2018. Public comments wanted at hearing about internet options

The county Redevelopment Commission (RDC) in 2016 and early 2017 abandoned the goal to pursue updates to the GIS infrastructure maps due to lack of support from Commissioner Biddle.

The county GIS map can be updated at any time to identify existing and planned expansion of broadband.  Economic development plans in areas that are currently supported by broadband can also be developed.

Commissioner Biddle in her advocacy for the Maple Leaf Performing Arts Center reinforced her disdain for planning in her remark: “We have planned ourselves to death …”   There is no evidence of any significant planning efforts supported by Commissioner Biddle. Ref: Guest Column: Maple Leaf proposal: Let’s not fail to plan. See also Chronology of Events – Maple Leaf.

Examples of County Comprehensive Plan and Road Maintenance Plans. 

A “plan” is a written account of the intended future course of action aimed at achieving the specific goal (s) or objective (s) within a specific timeframe. It explains in detail what needs to be done, when, how, and by whom.

Questions for Candidates: