Purpose: Identify criteria for selecting candidates. Keep track of major decisions and alignment with the non-partisan political platform.
The short version of the platform:
- Support for a Common Vision – The community working together to make things better where actions result in outcomes where everyone gains, or at least, are not any worse off.
- Say what you are going to do, do what you say
- Plans and Planning – Fail to plan – plan to fail – Ben Franklin
- Be open, honest, and communicate (transparency)
- Provide and post a webcast of the commissioner and council meetings allowing voters 24×7 access?
- Apply collaborative problem solving and decision-making processes
- Are policy changes respective to higher taxes, spending, development, wastewater treatment (septics, sewers), water infrastructure, etc, increasing the cost of living and leading to gentrification?
- Gentrification defined as demand in an area that attracts wealthier residents and investors that lead to changes that increase the cost of living to the extent that previous residents can no longer afford to live in the area.
- Will higher taxes on fewer people accelerate a population decline?
- County Council approved $270K of funding for the Bean Blossom Sewer Project:
- Was/Is the project supported by the customers?
- Was a successful partnership with the Helmsburg RSD established?
- Was a countywide assessment and strategy developed for the county?
- Did/does this strategy have community support?
- Was the update to the 1997 ordinance supported by citizens?
Economic Development Strategic Plan Was the plan approved and supported by the citizens?
- Did the county update the County Comprehensive Plan? (The county was/is eligible to apply for a 50K grant to update the plan).
- In addition to the 2018 Economic Development Strategic Planning Grant ($40K), how many other grants were applied for and received?
In 2017 and based on the income survey where it was identified that 53.1% of the population fell within the low to moderate-income (LMI) level, the county became eligible to apply for planning grants. Eligibility lasts for four years.
- Did the input from the public lead to adjustments in the plan to include cancellation?
- If the project went forward, was the remonstrance successful?
- Did the courthouse and prosecutors office receive the required maintenance and renovations?
- Operations. Were taxpayers asked for funding support – loans or subsidies or has it been self-supporting?
- Admin Agreement – Distribution of Profits – Were any changes made to the Admin Agreement – 75% to BCCF or 100% to the county?
Clearcutting – Bean Blossom Overlook. Were the issues successfully resolved? Were changes made to the policy (s) that will prevent a re-occurrence?
- Was the communication tower installed?
- Were there any unexpected expenses passed on to county taxpayers?
- Does the public think that the steel truss highway bridges are contributing to the county aesthetics?
Finance and Operations – County Comprehensive Financial Plan (2016-21)
- Has the plan been continually improved?
- Did the council increase taxes?
- Did the county publish a 5, 10, or longer capital improvement plan and budget?
- Was a road and bridge plan developed and posted?
- Did the county publish the results from an annual review of internal controls?
- Did the county publish an annual report of performance?
- What are the trends in taxes and spending?
- Has a needed change been made in health insurance coverage?
Oversight of County Boards and Commissions
- Were roles and responsibilities published on the county website?
- Were annual reports published?